posters mocking an objectively attractive girl screams of “pointy elbows” st
| up-to-no-good appetizing roast beef | 12/08/25 | | Charcoal concupiscible ape | 12/08/25 | | Splenetic milk | 12/08/25 | | Charcoal concupiscible ape | 12/08/25 | | flesh dilemma | 12/08/25 | | cerebral center | 12/08/25 | | razzle-dazzle stag film partner | 12/08/25 | | flesh dilemma | 12/08/25 | | Splenetic milk | 12/08/25 | | arousing property | 12/08/25 | | cerebral center | 12/08/25 | | Splenetic milk | 12/08/25 | | arousing property | 12/08/25 | | up-to-no-good appetizing roast beef | 12/08/25 | | Charcoal concupiscible ape | 12/08/25 | | up-to-no-good appetizing roast beef | 12/08/25 | | razzle-dazzle stag film partner | 12/08/25 | | Splenetic milk | 12/08/25 | | beta exciting point | 12/08/25 | | up-to-no-good appetizing roast beef | 12/08/25 | | Splenetic milk | 12/08/25 | | cracking locale feces | 12/08/25 | | up-to-no-good appetizing roast beef | 12/08/25 | | Splenetic milk | 12/08/25 | | up-to-no-good appetizing roast beef | 12/08/25 | | razzle-dazzle stag film partner | 12/08/25 | | cerebral center | 12/08/25 | | azure passionate station | 12/08/25 | | up-to-no-good appetizing roast beef | 12/08/25 | | cerebral center | 12/08/25 | | up-to-no-good appetizing roast beef | 12/08/25 | | cerebral center | 12/08/25 | | 180 stain field | 12/08/25 | | up-to-no-good appetizing roast beef | 12/08/25 | | cerebral center | 12/08/25 | | up-to-no-good appetizing roast beef | 12/08/25 | | cerebral center | 12/08/25 | | up-to-no-good appetizing roast beef | 12/08/25 | | Splenetic milk | 12/08/25 | | cerebral center | 12/08/25 | | Splenetic milk | 12/08/25 | | cerebral center | 12/08/25 | | 180 stain field | 12/08/25 | | Splenetic milk | 12/08/25 | | razzle-dazzle stag film partner | 12/08/25 | | Splenetic milk | 12/08/25 | | up-to-no-good appetizing roast beef | 12/08/25 | | razzle-dazzle stag film partner | 12/08/25 | | Splenetic milk | 12/08/25 | | razzle-dazzle stag film partner | 12/08/25 | | Splenetic milk | 12/08/25 | | Transparent ticket booth | 12/08/25 | | 180 stain field | 12/08/25 | | wonderful sticky really tough guy | 12/08/25 | | henna galvanic mother hissy fit | 12/08/25 | | sinister fragrant lodge | 12/08/25 | | Comical wine business firm | 12/08/25 | | 180 stain field | 12/08/25 | | razzle-dazzle stag film partner | 12/08/25 | | 180 stain field | 12/08/25 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 12/08/25 | | "''"'"'"'" | 12/08/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 8th, 2025 2:10 PM Author: Charcoal concupiscible ape
first off, she's not objectively attractive. subjectively, it's even worse if you consider her relative to others her age.
second, she's also being rated on the 'is she attractive enough to blow up my marriage, kids, and pay out 10m++ for' - to which she objectively is not
tcr is to have a classy, relatively amicable divorce that doesn't involve 300+ page court docs, and then to never have a 'girlfriend' again. lmfao @ bragging about initials on tattoos. in what universe is this the right move for someone getting fresh out of a marriage and who has enough money to do whatever he wants with his time
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5807935&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310907",#49494126) |
 |
Date: December 8th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: Splenetic milk
the fact that i'm an anon on a message bort and have history of going against the zeitgeist is evidence i'm not virtue signaling.
how do you explain people like george clooney who would have no problem replacing his wife with a young supermodel if every guy is like that?
of course many people are unfaithful, and many would leave their wife if a better option presented itself. that issue is whether *every* man is like that. and i disagree. i wouldn't cheat because some extraordinarily attractive option became available.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5807935&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310907",#49494961) |
Date: December 8th, 2025 2:27 PM Author: cerebral center
Pussy is pussy who cares what she looks like if he enjoys fucking her
We're mocking him because he ditched his wife and children for the opportunity to pay a chick to have sex with him for a few weeks. Not because the chick is below some hazy standard of attractiveness
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5807935&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310907",#49494200) |
 |
Date: December 8th, 2025 2:53 PM Author: cerebral center
N-n-n-no I'm not upset, y-y-you're the one wh-who's upset!!!1
That's why this guy has to go online to post pictures of the woman he's paying for sex to be viewed by anonymous strangers. Because he's not upset and insecure and we are
Yeah you nailed it, champ
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5807935&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310907",#49494313) |
Date: December 8th, 2025 4:16 PM Author: wonderful sticky really tough guy
she's a 6.5, or 7 on her best day. what more is there to be said?
no she's isn't ugly. no, no one would turn her down for sex.
yes she is disappointing for being the love affair of a deca-millionaire. yes she is below par (especially on the trashiness rating, which is not the same as attractiveness) for breaking up a family for.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5807935&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310907",#49494575) |
 |
Date: December 8th, 2025 10:52 PM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
no doubt nutella has opinions. she's not one shy for opinions.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5807935&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310907",#49495579) |
|
|