Fordham Law dissected as TTT in now-deleted reddit post
| ,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,.,,,.,.,,.,,.,.,.,..,., | 02/07/26 | | CapTTTainFalcon | 02/07/26 | | ,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,.,,,.,.,,.,,.,.,.,..,., | 02/07/26 | | .,..,..,.,,..,..,,,,,,,,..,...,.,.,., | 02/07/26 | | ,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,.,,,.,.,,.,,.,.,.,..,., | 02/07/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 7th, 2026 3:58 PM
Author: ,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,.,,,.,.,,.,,.,.,.,..,.,
r/lawschooladmissions • 15h ago ••.
Notes from Fordham Law School Visit Last Week (Beware of Fordham Law)
Key Observations
A. Front-of-House / Reception
• Initial interaction with Fordham's security/public safety felt disorganized and dismissive. She wasn't aware of there being a tour scheduled for that day.
• When she found out, she didn't care. There was no actual check in process.
• Complete lack of clarity and professionalism around visitor reception.
• Noticed a significant contrast between Fordham and Harvard/Yale/Columbia where tours are treated as routine, are highly organized, and prospective students are treated with immediate respect.
B. Campus Environment (Lincoln Center)
• Physical footprint felt very compressed: vertical layout, narrow corridors, limited open commons. Not much of a campus.
• Environment did not seem optimized for voice projection, debate, or large-room discourse.
• Overall spatial design did not seem to accommodate goals of intellectually expansion.
C. Student Demeanor (Observed Informally)
• Students generally appeared more constrained in confidence and presence.
• Lower emphasis on public articulation, polish, or intellectual dominance compared to elite undergraduate or law school environments.
• Overall did not signal any sort of assumption of excellence or rigor.
D. Tour Guide Performance
• Tour guide appeared very nervous, insecure, and poorly prepared.
• Not well groomed. He wore a bacon collar Hanes white t-shirt under a loose fitting sweater
• Overshared his personal shortcomings with prospective students (e.g., low GPA, did not place into Big Law, shared LGBTQ status and desire to find a man, which did not seem appropriate?).
• Excessive self-disclosure unrelated to representing the Law School.
• He had a tendency to minimize, deflect or redirect prospective students' questions.
• Failed to hold the role cleanly as a representative of the Law School.
• Psychological dynamic: he relied on his authority as a law student / tour guide as a buffer against insecurity, rather than confidently embodying the institution and its values.
E. Voice Compression
• The Fordham Law School environment felt like it would require keeping one's voice down rather than training students for public speaking roles.
• Fordham's Law School felt more closely aligned with an early undergraduate (freshman year of undergrad) dynamic rather than an advanced professional setting. One can hardly differentiate the Law students from undergraduates.
• Overall, Fordham Law School, as an institution needs to put more time and effort into rigorously vetting the individuals they put forward to represent their institution
• Fordham Law is very lucky to be ranked T50,
• T80-T100 seems much more appropriate, but they place well into BigLaw due to NYC campus location
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832158&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310908#49653879)
|
 |
Date: February 7th, 2026 11:50 PM
Author: ,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,.,,,.,.,,.,,.,.,.,..,.,
🥓
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832158&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310908#49654881) |
Date: February 7th, 2026 5:55 PM
Author: .,..,..,.,,..,..,,,,,,,,..,...,.,.,.,
"intellectual dominance"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832158&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310908#49654080) |
 |
Date: February 7th, 2026 11:50 PM
Author: ,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,.,,,.,.,,.,,.,.,.,..,.,
ðŸ§
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832158&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310908#49654882) |
|
|