Is it too rude to call the opposing side's argument "silly" in a brief?
| Know-it-all Bateful Gaming Laptop | 12/06/25 | | Sepia dopamine | 12/06/25 | | Fantasy-prone nursing home | 12/06/25 | | Sepia dopamine | 12/06/25 | | Wonderful Associate | 12/06/25 | | pale spot | 12/06/25 | | Know-it-all Bateful Gaming Laptop | 12/06/25 | | pale spot | 12/06/25 | | Fuchsia Dilemma | 12/06/25 | | Fuchsia Dilemma | 12/06/25 | | insecure mauve trailer park queen of the night | 12/06/25 | | Fantasy-prone nursing home | 12/06/25 | | Sepia dopamine | 12/06/25 | | histrionic headpube | 12/06/25 | | pale spot | 12/06/25 | | histrionic headpube | 12/06/25 | | pale spot | 12/07/25 | | histrionic headpube | 12/07/25 | | racy sandwich locale | 12/06/25 | | Pearl Pit | 12/06/25 | | Sepia dopamine | 12/06/25 | | irradiated buff quadroon volcanic crater | 12/06/25 | | honey-headed jewess heaven | 12/06/25 | | pale spot | 12/06/25 | | Know-it-all Bateful Gaming Laptop | 12/06/25 | | Multi-colored black woman chapel | 12/06/25 | | curious skinny woman | 12/06/25 | | Know-it-all Bateful Gaming Laptop | 12/06/25 | | talented nibblets | 12/07/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: December 6th, 2025 12:56 PM Author: pale spot
bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including "ridiculous."
there is no advantage to doing this. if the argument is ridiculous the court won't have to be told that. if they agree with you your use will either have a neutral or negative impression. so there's no advantage.
tcr instead of just saying "it's silly" is to highlight its silliness instead of just saying it outright. there are plenty of ways you can shit on OC's arguments without just saying "they're silly." if it truly is silly this shouldn't be difficult.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310909#49488562) |
|
|