SpaceX has now lost the equivalent of a full Tesla in market capitalization
| Hideous prole | 07/28/26 | | Hideous prole | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | Hideous prole | 07/28/26 | | carnelian deranged shitlib | 07/28/26 | | Hideous prole | 07/28/26 | | carnelian deranged shitlib | 07/28/26 | | mauve step-uncle's house | 07/28/26 | | Twinkling trump supporter bawdyhouse | 07/28/26 | | Hideous prole | 07/28/26 | | Twinkling trump supporter bawdyhouse | 07/28/26 | | Hideous prole | 07/28/26 | | Twinkling trump supporter bawdyhouse | 07/28/26 | | carnelian deranged shitlib | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | carnelian deranged shitlib | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | carnelian deranged shitlib | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | carnelian deranged shitlib | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | carnelian deranged shitlib | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | carnelian deranged shitlib | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | Hideous prole | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | Hideous prole | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | Hideous prole | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | Hideous prole | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | Hideous prole | 07/28/26 | | Hideous prole | 07/28/26 | | Beta Stead | 07/28/26 | | Hideous prole | 07/28/26 | | Talented Bright Hospital Personal Credit Line | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | Talented Bright Hospital Personal Credit Line | 07/28/26 | | Twinkling trump supporter bawdyhouse | 07/28/26 | | Razzmatazz Crackhouse Psychic | 07/28/26 | | transparent twinkling uncleanness stag film | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | transparent twinkling uncleanness stag film | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | Talented Bright Hospital Personal Credit Line | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | Talented Bright Hospital Personal Credit Line | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | Talented Bright Hospital Personal Credit Line | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | Talented Bright Hospital Personal Credit Line | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | Talented Bright Hospital Personal Credit Line | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | Talented Bright Hospital Personal Credit Line | 07/28/26 | | transparent twinkling uncleanness stag film | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | Twinkling trump supporter bawdyhouse | 07/28/26 | | transparent twinkling uncleanness stag film | 07/28/26 | | Twinkling trump supporter bawdyhouse | 07/28/26 | | transparent twinkling uncleanness stag film | 07/28/26 | | Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home | 07/28/26 | | Cheese-eating adulterous idea he suggested | 07/28/26 | | Talented Bright Hospital Personal Credit Line | 07/28/26 | | Maniacal Theater Stage | 07/28/26 | | Amber state gaming laptop | 07/28/26 | | Maniacal Theater Stage | 07/29/26 | | pearl fluffy ceo | 07/29/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 28th, 2026 10:10 AM Author: Hideous prole
Down 5% this morning.
Buy @ $60 guys
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310909#50029287) |
 |
Date: July 28th, 2026 11:37 AM Author: Hideous prole
Misleading?
lol no fag. Retail investors who bought are not holding at an average of $135 after day 1.
The price available to the retail/the market, is NOT the allocation price available to a few, but the first trading price where people can actually buy it at.
Gas yourself kike.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310909#50029516) |
 |
Date: July 28th, 2026 12:04 PM Author: Hideous prole
you faggot.
Guy who pissed the whole point that they went to market due to RETARDED PUBLIC MEME shit causing the over valuation and that is why Musk decided not to continue fundraising with professional investors.
ty for missing the entire point.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310909#50029601) |
 |
Date: July 28th, 2026 12:15 PM Author: Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home
Then answer my question: what is the remedy? Or are you just bitching about how stocks are volatile when there's mass speculation?
The market price of anything reflects it's value at that moment in time. There is no way to prevent people from buying overvalued things because there's no way to prove that somethings "real" value is significantly different from it's market value.
There's no way to prevent people from doing this aside from keeping them out of the market entirely. Which I think we should do in this case, i.e. SEC rules should not have been changed to permit this IPO especially when passive investors will be forced to acquire it. But you can say that without misrepresenting the situation by saying SpaceX is down 50%, which was driven by post-IPO speculation from the market.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310909#50029623) |
 |
Date: July 28th, 2026 11:38 AM Author: Hideous prole
Retail at the $135 IPO price: approximately 111.1 million shares, worth $15.0 billion. Retail ultimately received 20% of the 555.6 million-share offering, despite up to 30% initially being reserved.
Retail bought on day one: approximately 2.8 million net shares, based on $453 million of net retail buying and an estimated average price around $160.
So retail acquired roughly 40× more shares through the IPO allocation than through net purchases on the first trading day. The day-one figure is estimated because the reported data gives dollars, not an exact share count.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310909#50029524) |
Date: July 28th, 2026 7:44 PM Author: transparent twinkling uncleanness stag film
The real idiocy in all of this is to "value" a company based on the structured scarcity of a 5% float. Cf. 90% of Google stock is publicly traded.
If Gay-X issued 5% more, its "value" would crater.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310909#50030706) |
 |
Date: July 28th, 2026 9:07 PM Author: Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home
Anyone extending SpaceX a loan is sophisticated enough to understand that valuing a company is more nuanced than share price x publicly available shares.
Elon retains majority control so manipulating his personal comp via financial wizardry isn't much of a concern, if any such performance incentives even exist.
I spoke to how such a turd of a company publicly debuting as a blue chip stock is really bad above. But putting more of the company on the market would make this worse, not better.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310909#50030849) |
 |
Date: July 28th, 2026 9:34 PM Author: Talented Bright Hospital Personal Credit Line
sure, i understand that
"I agree that going public was about raising funds without much concern about Grandma's 401k" without much concern about grandma's 401k, or a *deliberate financial predation on grandma's 401k* was really what i was asking about
why does he need to raise funds now on the public market? for what purpose?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310909#50030920) |
 |
Date: July 28th, 2026 9:45 PM Author: Contagious cruel-hearted nursing home
Did you listen to his Economist interview?
My appraisal of Elon is that he sincerely believes in this shit and that he's working to make humanity better. He doesn't even think money will matter in 10 years and has been consistently annoyed that financial markets exist and how much energy is spent on capital allocation. So, I think his thought process was essentially "SpaceX will make humanity better, getting more money will accelerate that, Grandma has free will in whether to buy, and she'll be better off anyway."
I disagree with much of that. But I don't think his motivation is to screw Grandma for personal gain. He could already live the best possible RSF hedonism for thousands of years if he wanted. But I'm sure many disagree.
Regardless, that's a long winded way of saying: He wanted to raise money.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310909#50030960) |
 |
Date: July 28th, 2026 9:49 PM Author: Talented Bright Hospital Personal Credit Line
i didn't watch the interview, i think he's retarded when he speaks or tweets, boring and sooooo basic
(yes yes he's worlds richest man and i'm not, thanks)
personally i think he is 80% grifter, 20% new tech. he sells dreams to people, that's what he's good at. hes made endless promises and always pushes them off, what matters isnt delivery but keeping the promises alive. he's GOAT at that
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310909#50030990) |
 |
Date: July 28th, 2026 9:22 PM Author: transparent twinkling uncleanness stag film
Thank you for clarifying that. I apologize for misunderstanding the question, so please allow me to answer the question that you actually asked (haha).
I'm not particularly concerned by it. But that methodology leads "financial journalists" to write retarded headlines like, "SPCX has lost more than the entire value of Tesla in just six weeks!" And then those headlines get repeated by proles, when they have no actual bearing on any economic "value."
By comparison ChatGayPT says that 70-75% of TSLA is in public hands.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310909#50030879) |
 |
Date: July 28th, 2026 11:19 PM Author: transparent twinkling uncleanness stag film
I think you're not getting it. When Google has 12B publicly traded shares valued at $350 each and decides to issue 100M more to raise capital, it barely moves the needle, b/c plenty of people would buy at $345.
But GayX currently has 5% of its shares in circulation. If it tried to raise capital by issuing another 3%, it would send the price into the shitter, and cut the "value" of the company in half.
Does that make sense?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310909#50031207)
|
Date: July 29th, 2026 2:19 AM Author: pearl fluffy ceo
wats up with goyim and faketech?
they scrapped concorde bc the tritanium the engineers said was in the fuselage was just regular titanium
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5886993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310909#50031339) |
|
|