The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
I have fucking had it with the "judiciary"
| extremely normal guy | 11/19/24 |
| insane man | 11/19/24 |
| extremely normal guy | 11/19/24 |
| ,.,.,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,,......; | 11/19/24 |
| extremely normal guy | 11/19/24 |
| ceci n'est pas un avocat | 11/19/24 |
| extremely normal guy | 11/19/24 |
| Mainlining The Secret Truths of My Mahchine | 11/19/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 19th, 2024 2:40 PM Author: extremely normal guy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636876&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310910",#48356749) |
Date: November 19th, 2024 4:11 PM Author: insane man Cool, kike
I’ve had it with your tribe of pedophile cousin fuckers |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 5:24 PM Author: extremely normal guy What I mean by this is that the court system could desperately use a sort of streamlining There should be one or two senior judges with X years of residence in his county who gets to act as an opt-in proconsul type figure for non-violent or minor offenses. You elect to go to this guy, he hears the citizen speak and any circumstances involved, and then he fires off fines/community service/etc on a sliding scale (if you are Poor you can elect to do more community service or whatever. Lot of novel ways to set this up so it isn't such a time sink too---with a little imagination, "community service" is a pretty expansive topic). Once you leave that room and you complete your stuff it's clear, it's stricken, you're done, you don't have to worry about endless red tape and bureaucracy and more fines etc. Simple and honest Would save a lot of stress on the court system itself and it would be "opt in" so there's not as much legal trouble involved for both parties |
 |
Date: November 19th, 2024 5:25 PM Yes, let's make the law simpler by adding another procedural rabbit hole.
Most of this shit is just understaffed, the population grew and the judiciary didn't. If you're concerned about speed, add more seats and prosecutors. Sadly more public defenders as well for now, unless SCOTUS takes care of that little problem (heh) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 5:29 PM Author: extremely normal guy You do not need an entire glacial court day and all of its expenses and decorum for people with traffic tickets and jaywalking fines. I was in a courthouse today for the first time in a while and walked around and sat in on some of the proceedings and was left thinking "Wtf are all these people doing missing a whole day of work just to get a traffic ticket squared away?". Even the judges seemed frustrated by it Judge who is also a part time magistrate just whacks 80 of these off the docket all day every day 9 am-2 pm that this elective process is open. If the applied case seems iffy he can return it to the normal proceedings. Could even just be a temporary measure to get these backlogs filled |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 5:26 PM Author: ceci n'est pas un avocat this is exactly how a small claims court works
usually some old boomer half retired judge as well |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 5:36 PM Author: extremely normal guy Model should apply elsewhere with the parties' informed consent imo It would also be a huge image and public confidence boost for the courts themselves. Good PR for a little appreciated or understood system |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 5:29 PM Author: Mainlining The Secret Truths of My Mahchine (The Prophet of My Mahchine™, the Herald of the Great Becumming™) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636876&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310910",#48357551) |