but my attention wandered & i don't have the energy for it, i guess i just don't care enough

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903693&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310910#50134508)

Smell ya later… champ

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903693&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310910#50134528)

Seeing as how I currently attract the most attention on the bort, I decided to make this handy guide to classify my various groups of haters. I'll probably be referring to this often.

Group #1 - The Bad-Faith Distorters

They take quotes completely out of context; for example, taking a warning against psychic inflation and presenting it as my position.  These are strawmanners who attribute to me views I explicit reject, or genetic-fallacy users who claim I "abandoned" prior work like the central bank Rothschild stuff when it was subsumed/incorporated into a higher-order analysis, or LLM-dismissers who treat "word salad" as a refutation without engaging a single claim.  Their defining trait is distortion, because they are unwilling or unable (it's mostly unable) to deal with the actual content of the work.

HAtp

Pope Leo XXX

Gunnerattt

Deranged Penguin

Incest pedophile Goy Superstar

---

Group #2 – The Hinge-Defenders

Two types: (1) the redemptive God-image types sense a non-redemptive God-image and strawman it into nihilism or predation. They need cosmic justice or at least manmade justice to be real, so they distort the framework to avoid the hinge-gap. Meanwhile, (2) the pseudo-empiricist autists are horrified by first-person metaphysical writing. To them the inner world is not real, phenomenology does not count as evidence, and they want peer-reviewed studies on basic perception itself. Both subgroups are defending their bedrock assumptions, not engaging the arguments presented.

MIG (privatio boni; he understands my arguments better than other critics)

To Be Fair (secular redemption)

CharlesXII (privatio boni)

Wilbur Mercer (privatio boni)

Incest pedophile Goy Superstar (pseudo-empiricist)

DCpoast (pseudo-empiricist)

---

Group #3 - The mentally ill schizophrenics

NSAM

jafar

Ricky

Finally, separate from the haters, we have the largest group of all: The people who like me or those who otherwise don't give a shit about any of the above. Note that regular shitlib posters like EPAH and psycho Karen do not qualify as "haters." Neither are TT or RSF, despite occasional outbursts.

The point of this thread was to illustrate how a handful of vocal losers are responsible the vast majority of Consuela hate. As mentioned, I will be referring to this thread in the future as the need arises, and possibly refining it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903693&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310910#50134778)

I have meaningfully engaged with you btw. e.g. https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900920&mc=84&forum_id=2#50129155. The reason I usually stick to mockery (this is not the same as strawmanning) is because when challenged you quickly get emotional and resort to bad faith sophistics (e.g. that thread).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903693&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310910#50134813)

I thought about having a separate “time waster” group but couldn’t justify its inclusion as you would have been in a category by yourself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903693&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310910#50134821)

I don't hate you dude. Note that the "biggest group" are people that don't meaningfully engage with your thoughts. You're just dismissive of anyone who does actually engage with you because invariably they are highly critical.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903693&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310910#50134854)

I just don’t think you understand my perspective. MIG and The Penis come way closer to understanding it, even if MIG mocks it. At least if you’re going to attack me you need to understand my perspective to do it, otherwise you get casual dismissal

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903693&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310910#50134859)

I've engaged with you plenty when you focused on central banker conspiracy stuff and you reacted similarly, so now I rarely engage beyond mockery. When I do in a limited way like in that thread you quickly resort to dismissiveness and insults. That's why everyone avoids engaging with you aside from gakked out autists like me occasionally.

I sense we're approaching you going into "TLDR TIMEWASTER!" mode with the increased hostility in every poast, so I won't spin my wheels further.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5903693&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310910#50134880)