RESOLVED: if you prefer skinny women to thicc women, your gay
| glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | Razzmatazz Nibblets Step-uncle's House | 12/12/25 | | adulterous fragrant jap | 12/12/25 | | unhinged depressive temple | 12/12/25 | | Ebony Incel Tanning Salon | 12/12/25 | | Supple Place Of Business | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | pink zippy weed whacker | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | pink zippy weed whacker | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | Startling Titillating Church Building Hairy Legs | 12/12/25 | | Yellow son of senegal mad-dog skullcap | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | pink zippy weed whacker | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | Supple Place Of Business | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | Supple Place Of Business | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | Thriller office | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | Thriller office | 12/12/25 | | pink zippy weed whacker | 12/12/25 | | floppy base | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | Supple Place Of Business | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | unhinged depressive temple | 12/12/25 | | irate lilac principal's office macaca | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | cordovan cuck | 12/12/25 | | Pearl shitlib | 12/12/25 | | apoplectic roast beef dog poop | 12/12/25 | | bossy free-loading people who are hurt | 12/12/25 | | Razzmatazz Nibblets Step-uncle's House | 12/12/25 | | bateful keepsake machete dysfunction | 12/12/25 | | coral legal warrant | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | Startling Titillating Church Building Hairy Legs | 12/12/25 | | swashbuckling laser beams | 12/12/25 | | Metal Cobalt University French Chef | 12/12/25 | | nubile stead kitty cat | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | Startling Titillating Church Building Hairy Legs | 12/12/25 | | Supple Place Of Business | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | swashbuckling laser beams | 12/12/25 | | Red degenerate philosopher-king | 12/12/25 | | exciting space | 12/12/25 | | aggressive brindle business firm pozpig | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | aromatic saffron spot codepig | 12/12/25 | | aggressive brindle business firm pozpig | 12/12/25 | | cordovan cuck | 12/12/25 | | tan up-to-no-good resort | 12/12/25 | | exciting space | 12/12/25 | | Red degenerate philosopher-king | 12/12/25 | | Red degenerate philosopher-king | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 | | Red degenerate philosopher-king | 12/12/25 | | exciting space | 12/12/25 | | glittery umber stain | 12/12/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:48 AM Author: aromatic saffron spot codepig
in 2025 BMI is more a metric for how responsible and diligent a woman is. white people mitigate their primal instincts with rationality. a dindu going off pure instinct would find #1 the most attractive, but a highly selective male in 2025 would see that this person is going to balloon to 250 after kids, be lazy, and cook a lot of meals with kraft cheese and heavy cream.
all that being said if you're not "attracted" to any of these women (except #2, which is pixar) you're a homosexual.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911",#49504316) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 5:56 PM Author: irate lilac principal's office macaca
theres no soybean oil(or even canola) in kraft singles. its not in their regular mac and cheese either.
maybe youre thinking about velveeta or some less common kraft product.
kraft singles are far from an ideal food and obviously processed as hell but very unfairly shit on by people who dont know what theyre talking about
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911",#49505399)
|
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:51 AM Author: glittery umber stain
no no no, see i know what you're trying to do here. this is what "men" who claim to "prefer" skinny "women" always try to do. they attempt to rationalize and abstract their preferences with ridiculous nonsense like "erm, but what i'm thinking is that a decade from now, this woman will be fatter or less attractive, therefore my brain is less/more attracted to her right now in this moment"
no. attraction is an animalistic, primal phenomenon. you either want to have sex with her, right now, or you don't. it's not an intellectual or abstract thing. we do not incorporate Reason into our sexual instincts
you can't fool me, buster
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911",#49504326) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:03 PM Author: aromatic saffron spot codepig
girl #1 is gonna smell like sweat and does not have the physical fitness to fuck good. girl #2 is going to be diligently manicured and have the energy and fitness of a cokehead because she is.
there's a certainly a primal, unthinking component to it as well. and most men with both options on the table are gonna choose #3. sorry buster.
i do agree #3 is too skinny and should eat a sandwich. but #1s thighs are touching all the way down to her knees.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911",#49504362) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:11 PM Author: glittery umber stain
you're still coming up with these goofy abstract rationalizations that have nothing to do with your actual biological attraction/non-attraction to these women. you're totally full of shit!
it's fascinating to me that men so often try to pretend like they rationalize their sexual attraction. it's such a womanly thing. women do this way more, of course, and it's just as bogus when they do it, and we men all recognize that it's bogus when they do it. but then for some reason, a lot of men do it too. i think it's just over-socialization: they want their stated preferences to meet the social consensus
men's revealed preference is for generally thicker women. you don't ever see skinny porn stars. they always have implants or naturally big tits and curvaceous thighs and asses. nobody is jerking off to twiggy chicks. because men who claim they're attracted to skinny women are full of shit
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911",#49504380) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:20 PM Author: aromatic saffron spot codepig
"there's a certainly a primal, unthinking component to it as well. and most men with both options on the table are gonna choose #3. sorry buster."
you conveniently skip over this part.
for as much as you lisp about my rationalizations i'm simply speculating on why most people would choose #3. but MOST PEOPLE WILL CHOOSE #3!
also, its a fucking preference, some will choose #1 of course. why can't you just accept that people have different primal preferences rather than insisting your POV is the correct one and everyone that says differently must be lying?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911",#49504404) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:30 PM Author: aromatic saffron spot codepig
i know i'm rolling with it.
i think you got it backwards, son. most people would fuck #3 and wife #1. #3 looks like a model whore, vapid, etc whereas #1 looks like she's already a mom.
this might have to do more with things outside their body type though. if #1 was gothed out and #3 was in a sundress maybe this would be reversed.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911",#49504460) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:53 AM Author: cordovan cuck
cr. OP is trying to mask his homosexuality with aggression and ideology.
just come out GaySuperstar
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911",#49504330)
|
Date: December 12th, 2025 1:32 PM Author: aggressive brindle business firm pozpig
Brother... don't get me wrong, if 1 and 2 were both laying in my bed nude with their legs behind their heads i would plow away and cum inside with reckless abandon. But LJL at marrying or settling down with a landbeast like that. They look halfway decent because they're mid 20s.
If they were mid 30s or worse still, over 40, they would like absolutely horrific esp if they're eating and health (or lack thereof) habits continue. They are at their prime metabolisms and that shit certainly doesn't improve for women over time.
#3 I would settle down with all day and pop out 4 kids no problem.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911",#49504685) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 2:19 PM Author: aromatic saffron spot codepig
"you're not self aware!"
"physical attraction is primal, not about rationalizations!"
-- goysuperstar, apparently suffering no cognitive dissonance from these contradictory positions
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911",#49504792) |
|
|