\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Int'l Law hypo: Iran closes Strait of Hormuz..

U.S. responds w/ military force. OK under intl law?
excitant pozpig
  02/25/12
What is an international law bro? Sounds like flame to me br...
Sadistic Boltzmann Nowag
  02/25/12
def. flame. pretend article 38 of ICJ means something for a ...
excitant pozpig
  02/25/12
Article 2 of the UN Charter: All members shall refrain in...
Idiotic whorehouse
  02/25/12
Carter Doctrine says fuck off to the applicability of this a...
excitant pozpig
  02/25/12
Also violates Kellog-Briand Pact <-- although this is sof...
out-of-control field mediation
  02/25/12
couldn't you argue the 2-mile wide shipping lane is internat...
out-of-control field mediation
  02/25/12
explosive warheads generally cannot be argued against.
laughsome lake mother jewess
  02/25/12
is the underlying principle here that a territory is interna...
Multi-colored plaza
  02/25/12
the strait is actually iranian territorial waters (21 miles ...
laughsome lake mother jewess
  02/25/12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_seas
Idiotic whorehouse
  02/25/12
freedom to hold naval exercises (like randomly firing a few ...
laughsome lake mother jewess
  02/25/12
...
out-of-control field mediation
  02/25/12
It's treated like the high seas because it's a strait necess...
balding principal's office love of her life
  02/25/12
wtf. territorial waters go out 12 miles, not 200
turquoise casino
  02/25/12
are you guys this dumb? blockading a country is an act of w...
Peach house
  02/25/12
not to mention the fact that ~20 billion barrels of oil flow...
excitant pozpig
  02/25/12
land based cruise missiles with passive IR seekers trump you...
laughsome lake mother jewess
  02/25/12
bro, this is a discussion about intl law. Everyone here know...
excitant pozpig
  02/25/12
tbf, *masturbates furiously*
Multi-colored plaza
  02/25/12
Wait for Iran to inevitably mine the strait or launch a miss...
ruddy windowlicker stage
  02/25/12
hence the iranian push to get nuclear warheads built. yo...
laughsome lake mother jewess
  02/25/12
lol iran can't crater shit noICBMpwnd
cyan garrison
  02/25/12
lol. even if iran developed nukes, or even if they developed...
Peach house
  02/25/12
THis is why ron paul's foreign policy makes sense ... and wh...
glassy skinny woman
  02/25/12
...
mewling brass liquid oxygen office
  03/10/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 7:00 PM
Author: excitant pozpig

U.S. responds w/ military force. OK under intl law?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20052778)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 7:01 PM
Author: Sadistic Boltzmann Nowag

What is an international law bro? Sounds like flame to me brother.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20052784)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 7:06 PM
Author: excitant pozpig

def. flame. pretend article 38 of ICJ means something for a moment.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20052832)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 7:02 PM
Author: Idiotic whorehouse

Article 2 of the UN Charter:

All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20052797)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 7:07 PM
Author: excitant pozpig

Carter Doctrine says fuck off to the applicability of this article.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20052845)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 7:11 PM
Author: out-of-control field mediation

Also violates Kellog-Briand Pact <-- although this is soft law. (not that all intl. law can't be regarded as soft law)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20052875)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 9:33 PM
Author: out-of-control field mediation

couldn't you argue the 2-mile wide shipping lane is international territory given the fact that so much of the world's oil flows through it each day?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20054040)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 9:41 PM
Author: laughsome lake mother jewess

explosive warheads generally cannot be argued against.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20054119)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 10:09 PM
Author: Multi-colored plaza

is the underlying principle here that a territory is international if a substantial proportion of the world's supply of an important commodity passes through the territory?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20054312)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 7:12 PM
Author: laughsome lake mother jewess

the strait is actually iranian territorial waters (21 miles across, well within the 200 mile water limits) shared jointly with UAE etc as it falls under all the countries territorial waters.

they dont have to close it. all they have to do is say they will randomly fire a few hundred rounds from an artillery cannon with a 15 mile range across the strait every day.

good luck getting insurance for your ships after that.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20052883)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 7:13 PM
Author: Idiotic whorehouse

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_seas

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20052895)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 7:15 PM
Author: laughsome lake mother jewess

freedom to hold naval exercises (like randomly firing a few hundred shells...) is not prohibited by that article mang.

also the high seas are not territorial waters.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20052909)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 7:16 PM
Author: out-of-control field mediation



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20052914)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 7:20 PM
Author: balding principal's office love of her life

It's treated like the high seas because it's a strait necessary for international commercial intercourse.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20052947)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 7:51 PM
Author: turquoise casino

wtf. territorial waters go out 12 miles, not 200

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20053111)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 7:56 PM
Author: Peach house

are you guys this dumb?

blockading a country is an act of war

closing the straights of hormuz is a naval blockade of Kuwait and Iraq, two of our allies.

act of war against our allies may be treated as an act of war against the United States.

the U.S. navy crushes the Iranian Navy and military withing 200 miles of the straits in about 12 hours.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20053161)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 8:30 PM
Author: excitant pozpig

not to mention the fact that ~20 billion barrels of oil flow out of it each day. Wouldn't criticality of global commerce trump some vague territorial claims?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20053504)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 9:36 PM
Author: laughsome lake mother jewess

land based cruise missiles with passive IR seekers trump your vague "criticality of global commerce" claims.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20054072)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 10:09 PM
Author: excitant pozpig

bro, this is a discussion about intl law. Everyone here knows that intl law lacks an enforcement mechanism and is worthless, not to mention the fact that it has been rendered historically moot by numerous armed conflicts without any reprisal from international bodies. I am simply wondering about which intl. laws would apply in this scenario, not whether or not anyone would give a fuck.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20054318)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 10:10 PM
Author: Multi-colored plaza

tbf, *masturbates furiously*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20054326)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 9:49 PM
Author: ruddy windowlicker stage

Wait for Iran to inevitably mine the strait or launch a missile or send out a speedboat-----Article 51 self-defense justification for use of force, bam. Tehran turns into a crater.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20054160)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 9:56 PM
Author: laughsome lake mother jewess

hence the iranian push to get nuclear warheads built.

you crater us, we crater you.

its how MAD works.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20054210)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 10:02 PM
Author: cyan garrison

lol iran can't crater shit

noICBMpwnd

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20054264)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 10:05 PM
Author: Peach house

lol. even if iran developed nukes, or even if they developed ICBMs, we could utterly wipe them off the face of the map before they knew what hit them.

1. if we launched nukes from subs right off their coasts, there is no way they would detect them soon enough to launch a counterstrike

2. alternatively, we could have black ops smuggle some nukes into the country and detonate them at iran's nuclear silos.

3. or, of course, the united states could just drop some nukes from a B2 bomber

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20054287)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 25th, 2012 10:16 PM
Author: glassy skinny woman

THis is why ron paul's foreign policy makes sense ... and why the fear mongering re iranian nuclear capability is retarded. Largely about isreal's discomfort with a nuclear armed iran really

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#20054371)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 10th, 2026 3:30 AM
Author: mewling brass liquid oxygen office



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1883233&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310911#49731211)