https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/early-election-night-results-final-tallies/story?id=92762835

Early election night results might not indicate final tallies (and why that's OK)

A "red mirage," or an artificial GOP vote lead, will likely reoccur Tuesday.

As early Election Day results come in on Tuesday, it will likely appear that a Republican candidates vying for any number of the federal or statewide races appear to be leading their Democratic opponents, even by large margins.

Their leads will dwindle, or crumble completely, after perceived "dumps" of votes are recorded by state election officials who count mail-in and absentee ballots in the days -- or even weeks -- following Election Day.

This phenomenon was popularized as the "red mirage" or the "blue shift" after the 2020 presidential election, when former President Donald Trump took a deceptive lead in several competitive states on Election Day due to delays in counting of Democrats' mail-in ballots -- their preferred method of voting due to the COVID-19 pandemic -- only to eventually dissipate when the entire reserve of votes was totaled.

The illusion was a principal component of Trump and his allies' false claims that the contest was fraudulent upon his ultimate loss to Joe Biden.

Why and where might we see a 'red mirage'

This is likely to occur again on Tuesday, according to election experts, because of the same cocktail of factors that led to a "red mirage" in 2020: Democrats have continued to use mail-in voting more than their Republican counterparts, while some of the same decisive states will take a longer time to tally their mail-in, absentee and provisional ballots due to state laws that prohibit their count until late stages in the electoral process.

And it's likely to occur in some of the same states where the phenomenon presented itself last cycle -- in states like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin -- battleground states that also happen to feature some of the most hotly-contested races of the election season.

"All signs point to the fact that it's going to be extreme in certain critical states again, and Pennsylvania top among them," Lawrence Norden, senior director of the Brennan Center's Elections & Government Program said, noting that certain candidates may claim false victories or legally attempt to stop or slow vote counts.

"I am very worried. I'm very worried that election denial forces are much more organized than they were in 2020."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45455775)

i'm sure everyone will be 'OK' with it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45455782)

*unzips*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456802)

Oh kooky just these specific states again

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45455787)

2. Bring in harvested mail-in ballots

3. Dump said ballots from suitcases onto tables at 4am to count, 99% of them going to Democrats

—-

If this were a country in Africa everyone would be laughing at the corrupt voting system

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45455800)

Their leads will dwindle, or crumble completely, after perceived "dumps" of votes are recorded by state election officials who count mail-in and absentee ballots in the days -- or even weeks -- following Election Day.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45455814)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45455831)

Heh. *spins dreidel*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45455965)

it should

this is completely insane, when did it suddenly start taking days, "weeks" to count votes w late dumps of "mail in ballots" coming in the next day?

people are sick of this nonsense

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456108)

When Trump came around and then won and the powers that be realized that they couldn't control the masses anymore and that elections needed to be "fortified" against said threats to control

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456143)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45455981)

Bateman agreed: "Just as football games do not end at the first quarter, you play out the game and it ends when the game ends. And whoever's in the lead at the end of the game wins. It's the same with elections. An election does not end, and it has ever ended on Election Day."

Bateman agreed: "Just as football games do not end at the first quarter, you play out the game and it ends when the game ends. And whoever's in the lead at the end of the game wins. It's the same with elections. An election does not end, and it has ever ended on Election Day."

Bateman agreed: "Just as football games do not end at the first quarter, you play out the game and it ends when the game ends. And whoever's in the lead at the end of the game wins. It's the same with elections. An election does not end, and it has ever ended on Election Day."

Bateman agreed: "Just as football games do not end at the first quarter, you play out the game and it ends when the game ends. And whoever's in the lead at the end of the game wins. It's the same with elections. An election does not end, and it has ever ended on Election Day."

Bateman agreed: "Just as football games do not end at the first quarter, you play out the game and it ends when the game ends. And whoever's in the lead at the end of the game wins. It's the same with elections. An election does not end, and it has ever ended on Election Day."

Bateman agreed: "Just as football games do not end at the first quarter, you play out the game and it ends when the game ends. And whoever's in the lead at the end of the game wins. It's the same with elections. An election does not end, and it has ever ended on Election Day."

Bateman agreed: "Just as football games do not end at the first quarter, you play out the game and it ends when the game ends. And whoever's in the lead at the end of the game wins. It's the same with elections. An election does not end, and it has ever ended on Election Day."

Bateman agreed: "Just as football games do not end at the first quarter, you play out the game and it ends when the game ends. And whoever's in the lead at the end of the game wins. It's the same with elections. An election does not end, and it has ever ended on Election Day."

Bateman agreed: "Just as football games do not end at the first quarter, you play out the game and it ends when the game ends. And whoever's in the lead at the end of the game wins. It's the same with elections. An election does not end, and it has ever ended on Election Day."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456352)

Dems use mail in ballots more than republicans. State laws - many passed by republicans - forbid counting until Election Day. Ergo mail in ballots counted starting on Election Day take longer to count and skew dem.

It’s not hard to understand……unless you’re a moronic republitard hellbent on feeling victimized like lil Drake

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456559)

Thoughts?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456652)

Also those ballots should not be counted until election day. We don't need early counts getting out and influencing the election. I'm already not happy with some states releasing the party affiliation of early voters prior to election day.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456658)

Hmmmmm lil Drake? Hmmmmm?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45457050)

Here you go

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45457796)

I award zero out of ten points.

Try again?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45459519)

In 8 states with 100% mail in, they are counted as they are received and release the final tally on election night.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456695)

Their faggotry knows no bounds

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456715)

Even when the problem (slow ballot counting) is entirely of their own making

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456750)

I love con tears. Delicious and rejuvenating.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456756)

REMINDER: To libs like Obeezy, the mere existence of "disparate outcomes" between different racial groups is not only overwhelming evidence of the existence of "structural white supremacy," but it justifies completely dismantling the structure of our country from the top down and spending hundreds of billions of dollars to solve that "problem" which, again, is definitely 100% real and exists, experts all agree just look at the evidence (which is all totally circumstantial but who cares shut the fuck up you sound racist)!

However, claims of widespread voter fraud have to be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt with ironclad photographic and/or DNA evidence or whatever and if you can't cite a CNN article discussing a specific criminal conviction for the crime of committing voter fraud (and each one of these has to be proven on an granular individual level of course hehe), then it's not a real issue it's just made-up cynical bullshit being forcememed to push a sinister political agenda.

Odd case, haha.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456842)

Why are you lying? Do you find it hard to be honest?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456850)

Link?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456855)

http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&mc=68&forum_id=2#45456842

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456889)

Link?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456895)

http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&mc=68&forum_id=2#45456842

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456902)

You seem bad at this. Link?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456908)

http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&mc=68&forum_id=2#45456842

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456912)

Swing, and a miss. Strange that you're so bad at this, I'm literally just using your line.

Link?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456917)

http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&mc=68&forum_id=2#45456842

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456925)

Still no link?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456977)

http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&mc=68&forum_id=2#45456842

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45456996)

Wow, so after all of these chances, still no link to you not pushing the former position?

Link?

Lol lil guy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45457010)

Still no link?

Link?

C'mon lil guy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45457045)

I asked for a link, and your response is "link"? This is very strange, Obeezy. I have a feeling you wouldn't be like "darn you got me" if that was my response to you next to you ask for a link, as you do in literally every thread, so I'm not sure why you think that's a brilliant retort to me here. Try harder, lil guy.

Here I'll tee it up again: Link?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45457245)

Hilarious and predictable.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45457163)

There are vastly more normal ballots than mail in ballots. Mail in ballots should not take days to count

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45457180)

Also while you’re here, cons had extensive audits of 2020 to uncover the fraud you’ve bleated about for years and continue to preemptively bleat about today. What was revealed by all these audits?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45457243)

Ok, so you are being a disingenuous kike

>>>Also while you’re here, cons had extensive audits of 2020 to uncover the fraud you’ve bleated about for years and continue to preemptively bleat about today. What was revealed by all these audits?

The beauty of the 2020 election steal and Democrat harvested mail-in ballots was that they were audit proof. It was a great strategy to fortify the election. Against the law, but unprovable

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45457281)

So to be clear you are 100% confident 2020 was fraudulent but you have no evidence to back this position up?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45459532)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5229348&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310915",#45457251)