\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Justice Jackson: aren't blatantly racist laws good precedent?

https://x.com/JCNSeverino/status/2013656844649009373
Provocative Flatulent Senate
  01/20/26
Gorsuch uses the Black Codes as rhetorical foils. Jackson wa...
Provocative Flatulent Senate
  01/20/26
No, it's clear that she was just trying to get the attorney ...
Slippery Gas Station Mother
  01/20/26
read the oral argument starting at page 97. Katyal, on behal...
Provocative Flatulent Senate
  01/20/26
Help me to understand. They did have breakfast in the coloni...
cerise vigorous reading party travel guidebook
  01/20/26
...
Provocative Flatulent Senate
  01/20/26
...
saffron mildly autistic ape jew
  01/20/26
Alito had to state the obvious too. I'm trying to find Katya...
Provocative Flatulent Senate
  01/20/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: January 20th, 2026 8:12 PM
Author: Provocative Flatulent Senate

https://x.com/JCNSeverino/status/2013656844649009373

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824454&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310917#49605031)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 20th, 2026 10:00 PM
Author: Provocative Flatulent Senate

Gorsuch uses the Black Codes as rhetorical foils. Jackson wanted to use them and apply them.

https://x.com/JCNSeverino/status/2013676099251675619

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824454&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310917#49605213)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 20th, 2026 10:49 PM
Author: Slippery Gas Station Mother

No, it's clear that she was just trying to get the attorney to admit that the "history and tradition" inquiry is flawed but picked a stupid way to go about it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824454&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310917#49605278)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 20th, 2026 10:54 PM
Author: Provocative Flatulent Senate

read the oral argument starting at page 97. Katyal, on behalf of Hawaii, really was relying on them. Jackson was supporting Katyal.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-1046_7l48.pdf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824454&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310917#49605283)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 20th, 2026 10:35 PM
Author: cerise vigorous reading party travel guidebook

Help me to understand. They did have breakfast in the colonial times.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824454&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310917#49605264)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 20th, 2026 10:45 PM
Author: Provocative Flatulent Senate



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824454&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310917#49605275)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 20th, 2026 10:44 PM
Author: saffron mildly autistic ape jew



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824454&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310917#49605274)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 20th, 2026 10:47 PM
Author: Provocative Flatulent Senate

Alito had to state the obvious too. I'm trying to find Katyal's response.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824454&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310917#49605277)