Rewatched Clockwork Orange (1971)
| cock of michael obama | 10/10/24 | | .- .-. . .-. . .--. - .. .-.. . | 10/10/24 | | cock of michael obama | 10/10/24 | | .- .-. . .-. . .--. - .. .-.. . | 10/10/24 | | cock of michael obama | 10/10/24 | | ceci n'est pas un avocat | 10/10/24 | | Kenneth Play | 10/10/24 | | cock of michael obama | 10/10/24 | | Masterminding Prison Assault | 10/10/24 | | 180 Missiles | 10/10/24 | | true in a Talmudic sense | 10/10/24 | | Masterminding Prison Assault | 10/10/24 | | cock of michael obama | 10/10/24 | | Kenneth Play | 10/10/24 | | Masterminding Prison Assault | 10/10/24 | | ceci n'est pas un avocat | 10/10/24 | | Long Doobsian Flying J RedWang Hehe-ing | 10/10/24 | | cock of michael obama | 10/10/24 | | true in a Talmudic sense | 10/10/24 | | ceci n'est pas un avocat | 10/10/24 | | ceci n'est pas un avocat | 10/10/24 | | Live Free or Die. | 10/10/24 | | cock of michael obama | 10/10/24 | | Live Free or Die. | 10/10/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 10th, 2024 1:56 AM Author: cock of michael obama
I rewatched A Clockwork Orange (1971). It's been many years since I've seen it; my memory of it was neutral. This time around what struck me was how muddled the message of the film was. The main character commits crime, is sentenced to prison, gets "rehabilitated" via predictive programming/brainwashing that makes him want to vomit if he's going to commit crime, he is released and attempts suicide when triggered, then the suicide attempt overcomes the programming. I guess there was kind of a message: that man may do everything it can to control it's environment -- here taking away free will by "rehabilitating" prisoners, then trying to corrupt McDowell’s character at the end by showing his embrace of the government that approved the brainwashing (even as he restarts his violent fantasies) -- but that free will finds a way to overcome it regardless. But the way the message is conveyed is quite messy. I understand the movie was based on a book by Anthony Burgess which I have not read and the book may be quite different.
Malcolm McDowell does a good job as the main character, especially the particular look of his smile makes him look quite deviant, kind of like the Joker. Everyone else is more or less forgettable, although the Hitler-looking prison warden did a decent job. The score was quite good. The film somewhat held my attention but not fully; the best parts were the early criminal scenes and the scenes with McDowell being brainwashed.
I would give it...I don't know, I guess a 5.5/10.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5609479&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310919#48183101) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2024 2:04 AM Author: cock of michael obama
how is it an indictment of socialism?
he overcomes the predictive programming (is that the socialism, the destruction of free will?) by the political opposition torturing him into trying to kill himself (is that good or bad? it seemed like they wanted him to try to kill himself even before the wheelchair guy realized mcdowell killed his wife) and at the end he goes back to a life of crime and goes on the government dole for helping a corrupt government stay in power (is that the socialism?)
the message is really muddled
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5609479&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310919#48183105) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2024 9:57 AM Author: Kenneth Play
ebert may be a sniveling lib but he is nonethless 180.
"all it really does is celebrate the nastiness of its hero, Alex"
per the catholic note below, the book makes it much more clear that the possibility of redemption is motivating the overall message. but in the film they nailed the deviant look so exactly and didn't give the viewer any inkling that the character is someone who can possibly be expected to achieve redemption. as a result, it's a flawed film despite technical mastery
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5609479&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310919#48183518) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2024 10:10 AM Author: Masterminding Prison Assault (No Future)
I often disagree with Ebert about stuff but he is just entertaining as hell. Also an unapologetic breast man, and forthright about being horny.
I like Pauline Kael, too, but she's sometimes just a bit too arch or misses the point.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5609479&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310919#48183554) |
Date: October 10th, 2024 7:27 AM Author: Masterminding Prison Assault (No Future)
Book is worth a read especially given the epilogue that’s not in the movie.
Author was very Catholic, and the fact that he was an atheist for most of his life (maybe all? I forget) doesn’t really get in the way of his enunciation of the Catholic ethos of the need for free will and the dignity of the human person, even when it throws up hard problems like the evil of Alex.
The movie gets some of this across but there the point seems more to be that the Ludovico Technique and associated apparatus is evil because it’s the same sort of reveling in cruelty that Alex does, except under the aegis of the state and morality. The movie just gives you the sort of grim choice between cruelty dispersed to the level of the individual and then meted out upon society at large (droog violence) or concentrated at the level of the collective and meted out upon individuals (Ludovico etc).
The book doesn’t escape this problem but leans into the idea that ultimately the latter is more evil because it takes away the ability of the individual to make a moral change (I know they do say this pretty explicitly in the movie but the book is more didactic on this point). This is why it’s impermissible to rewire Alex—it denies the possibility of his own salvation. Much of Catholic opposition to the death penalty comes from the same place.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5609479&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310919#48183275) |
Date: October 10th, 2024 9:47 AM Author: ceci n'est pas un avocat
never seen the movie as I don't watch 'films' per se. the book was inspired, such as it is, by Burgess's wife being gangraped irl. in COtb the book's main character beats the fuck out of an author inside his home and then gangrapes the author's wife in front of him (which later, unbeknownst to the pro(?)tagonist leads to her death).
the book the fictional author is writing at the time is called clockwork orange fwiw
also fwiw btw Burgess was known to be a pathological liar so who knows how many of these details are actually true
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5609479&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310919#48183484) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2024 9:54 AM Author: ceci n'est pas un avocat
the linguistics of the book are its most interesting part
a genuinely unique and creative attempt to show youth slang and how its simultaneously (1) internally coherent and comprehensible and (2) total nonsense to adults
using russian style words was brilliant and prevents (imo) it from sounding dated. imagine if the characters in the book were saying things like "say, mac daddy, that's a foxy chick" - which would more accurately reflect the actual slang of the time
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5609479&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310919#48183507)
|
|
|