\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Wait, this is the holding of Wong Kim Ark??

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a lan...
insanely creepy digit ratio cumskin
  12/08/25
I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it ove...
beady-eyed mustard sanctuary pervert
  12/08/25
You know how
cerebral nursing home sex offender
  12/08/25
hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary...
insanely creepy digit ratio cumskin
  12/08/25
imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but r...
frozen amethyst business firm double fault
  12/08/25
I don't have to imagine.
insanely creepy digit ratio cumskin
  12/08/25
...
frozen amethyst business firm double fault
  12/08/25
180
pungent slimy abode
  12/09/25
...
provocative rose heaven halford
  12/09/25
correct
razzmatazz chestnut hell voyeur
  12/09/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:37 PM
Author: insanely creepy digit ratio cumskin

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a landmark decision[2] of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth.[3]

Seems like a salient factor that WKA's parents "have a permanent domicile and residence in the united states and are there carrying on business"?

How does this turn into "who, at the time of his birth, entered the country illegally and committed a crime in entering"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026show=6hr",#49495681)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: beady-eyed mustard sanctuary pervert

I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it overturned

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026show=6hr",#49495682)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: cerebral nursing home sex offender

You know how

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026show=6hr",#49495683)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: insanely creepy digit ratio cumskin

hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary of Hate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026show=6hr",#49495687)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:39 PM
Author: frozen amethyst business firm double fault

imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but reading just now for the first tkme a portion of the wikipedia entry

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026show=6hr",#49495686)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: insanely creepy digit ratio cumskin

I don't have to imagine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026show=6hr",#49495688)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:42 PM
Author: frozen amethyst business firm double fault



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026show=6hr",#49495693)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 1:00 AM
Author: pungent slimy abode

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026show=6hr",#49495787)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 2:08 AM
Author: provocative rose heaven halford



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026show=6hr",#49495839)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 12:52 AM
Author: razzmatazz chestnut hell voyeur

correct

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026show=6hr",#49495777)