\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Trump admin filed reply brief in birthright citizenship case

https://x.com/bhweingarten/status/2034747530282438941?s=46
blackpiller
  03/21/26
The Trump admin has filed its reply brief in the birthright ...
blackpiller
  03/21/26
I like that argument
Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle
  03/23/26
rofl wtf is this shit did they have a DOJ MAGA intern write ...
AZNgirl not letting AZNmen enter Website
  03/23/26
It's called CON law for a reason, and it's not because it's ...
Fucking Fuckface
  03/23/26
speak for your self Rishi. nothing but sailing ships in my h...
peeface
  03/23/26
...
blackpiller
  03/21/26
...
blackpiller
  03/23/26
not even TTThomas will buy this BS. He’ll find some ot...
Forced Bi Cuckold of Hormuz
  03/23/26
...
AZNgirl not letting AZNmen enter Website
  03/23/26
I find briefs like this to be kind of pointless. It's not l...
Muscadine wine
  03/23/26
This but for literally all of "law"
community account (not racist)
  03/23/26
...
Fucking Fuckface
  03/23/26
stare decisis in those born before (not so long ago) fuck t...
sealclubber
  03/23/26
there is a strong case that Congress can regulate BRC, but i...
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
  03/23/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: March 21st, 2026 9:15 PM
Author: blackpiller

https://x.com/bhweingarten/status/2034747530282438941?s=46

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49760465)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 21st, 2026 9:37 PM
Author: blackpiller

The Trump admin has filed its reply brief in the birthright citizenship case before the Supreme Court. It opens:

The “main object” of the Citizenship Clause was to grant citizenship to freed slaves and their children, whose allegiance to the United States had generally been established through generations of parental domicile. By contrast, aliens who are just passing through the United States, and those who cross our borders illegally, lack ties of allegiance and do not obtain the “priceless and profound gift” of citizenship for their children.

To receive citizenship under the Clause, a person must be both born “in the United States” and “subject to the jurisdiction thereof…” That language grants citizenship to children “completely subject” to the United States’ “political jurisdiction.” Children of temporarily present or illegal aliens do not qualify because their parents are not domiciled in, and thus do not owe the requisite allegiance to, the United States. Temporarily present aliens are by definition not domiciled here, while illegal aliens lack the legal capacity to form such a domicile.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49760537)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2026 12:04 PM
Author: Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle (πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ πŸ‡΅πŸ‡±)

I like that argument

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49762328)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2026 12:07 PM
Author: AZNgirl not letting AZNmen enter Website

rofl wtf is this shit did they have a DOJ MAGA intern write this shit

"allegiance to the United States had generally been established through generations of parental domicile" --- rofl so by this rationale, is ANYONE a furking citizen? everyone at some point had an ancestor who HAD NOT been in the US for generations

and the "domicile" shit ljl if they arent domiciled in US can they be arrested for shoplifting or other crime?

rofl

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49762340)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2026 12:17 PM
Author: Fucking Fuckface

It's called CON law for a reason, and it's not because it's conservative

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49762407)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2026 1:01 PM
Author: peeface

speak for your self Rishi. nothing but sailing ships in my history.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49762577)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 21st, 2026 10:04 PM
Author: blackpiller



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49760619)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2026 12:03 PM
Author: blackpiller



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49762321)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2026 12:06 PM
Author: Forced Bi Cuckold of Hormuz

not even TTThomas will buy this BS. He’ll find some other way to rule in Trump’s favor but this isn’t it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49762339)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2026 12:07 PM
Author: AZNgirl not letting AZNmen enter Website



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49762343)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2026 12:08 PM
Author: Muscadine wine

I find briefs like this to be kind of pointless. It's not like the justices are going to be swayed by these things, they have their own ideas and clerks to research these questions. They're going to rule however they like and I can't see these briefs doing much.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49762348)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2026 12:22 PM
Author: community account (not racist)

This but for literally all of "law"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49762421)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2026 12:59 PM
Author: Fucking Fuckface



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49762563)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2026 12:15 PM
Author: sealclubber

stare decisis in those born before (not so long ago)

fuck the rest of them

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49762396)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 23rd, 2026 1:26 PM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


there is a strong case that Congress can regulate BRC, but i don't see how the POTUS can do it on his own.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5848419&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49762646)