I'm just now learning about finance for the first time
| A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | adrian dittman | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | adrian dittman | 03/24/26 | | ...,....,,........ | 03/24/26 | | AI cat video connoisseur | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | AI cat video connoisseur | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | ,;;, | 03/24/26 | | the indian justin bieber | 03/24/26 | | Scientists now believe | 03/24/26 | | AI cat video connoisseur | 03/24/26 | | MASE | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | MASE | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | AI cat video connoisseur | 03/24/26 | | Talk to Alvor of Riverwood | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | Send dollar to zero | 03/24/26 | | AI cat video connoisseur | 03/24/26 | | pf's stinky (and sticky!) holds | 03/24/26 | | Send dollar to zero | 03/24/26 | | pf's stinky (and sticky!) holds | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | Joe Kent is a rabid antisemite | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | pf's stinky (and sticky!) holds | 03/24/26 | | Joe Kent is a rabid antisemite | 03/24/26 | | Nazca Redlines | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | Joe Kent is a rabid antisemite | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | Diamond Dallas Chad | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | sealclubber | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | sealclubber | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | sealclubber | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | Joe Kent is a rabid antisemite | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | Waingro | 03/24/26 | | lex | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | sealclubber | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | sealclubber | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | pf's stinky (and sticky!) holds | 03/24/26 | | sealclubber | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | sealclubber | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | sealclubber | 03/24/26 | | Diamond Dallas Chad | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | :-P | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | cucumbers | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | Kenneth Play | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | Kenneth Play | 03/24/26 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 03/24/26 | | A Stripper Named Hegemony | 03/24/26 | | retarded stupid faggot | 03/24/26 | | cowgod | 03/24/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 24th, 2026 12:11 PM Author: AI cat video connoisseur
it's so jewish and tedious and off-putting
the financial system is literally just a scam and it's super lame and depressing
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5849224&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49765113) |
 |
Date: March 24th, 2026 1:18 PM Author: A Stripper Named Hegemony
I recently learned that there are assets that appreciate long term at much higher rates than the market. This really blew my mind. I thought value investing was a relic of the past but apparently you really can find growth stocks in the long run.
I also learned that there are still people who fuck with bonds and dividends. Get paid for someone to hold your cash and then get the principle back. I thought this didn't exist anymore either.
Really blows your mind when you realize there are people who go beyond just parking their money in the S&P. So many juicer asset classes. It's also really crazy how bad an investment real estate is. People complain about home prices, if you invest aggressively you will make way more money than any real estate inflation. Crazy people even complain about high values when they could be aggressively making money instead. Like oh my home went up 7%. OK but some asset somewhere went up like 10x. But muh home! You have to have a home!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5849224&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49765259) |
 |
Date: March 24th, 2026 2:10 PM Author: A Stripper Named Hegemony
Yeah what you're doing can't even really be described as investing. Of course the S&P is the mortal lock guarantee that's best for the average person. But think of the average person. It's like saying this is the best plan for people who don't know anything and have no plan. It's good that you diversify your assets and spread the risk around. But it's still not value investing. Investing is having a well thought out concrete idea that you truly believe in and going after it hard. For example in 5 years the S&P went up 65%. Pretty good right. And the risk was low, it rarely dips greater than 10% before rallying.
But Nvidia is up 1250% during that same time. And you didn't think to do it. I didn't either. But somebody did. And anyone could have. Somebody could have had the idea and been reading business journals all the time and actually know something concrete and actionable about the industry before it was on the front page of the Wall Street Journal.
I'm just saying that while yes you're right that it's a good idea for most people at the same time if you had done a fuckload of research and made a tough call and been right, you could have 10x'd your entire net worth and your whole life would be different. And you can't say oh well it's all unknowable and it's all luck and no one knows and how could anyone... Yeah, people do. People have an idea sometimes and they're right. They're actually spot on and they can make life changing against when they're right and it pays off. Yes it could go the other way and that's why it's risky. You take on a risk and you get the reward.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5849224&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49765465) |
 |
Date: March 24th, 2026 8:15 PM Author: A Stripper Named Hegemony
Yeah in fact by dollar value it's heavily skewed towards the top performers. It's not 50/50 at all lol. It's a few elite stonks carrying.
Also the market read as the index ie S&P (seems to be a lot of slow people around here) is itself comprised of top performers — it's the 500 top companies in America. If your company sucks they drop you from the index. So to beat the market you have to beat the top 500 which has an average annual return of 11% lifetime. So the odds of picking a major mover are way less than 50/50. The market is not an average of all stocks. It's the average of 500 winners. And that nets you 11%.
To beat 500 winners you really have to have something special. That's why a lot of people buy Mag7, the tech stocks that are driving the economy. That's a much better basket because they're all high performers at the top end of the winners.
It's amazing how I ran circles around all these chuds about finance. Really thought there would be some more MFEs on here.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5849224&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49766536) |
 |
Date: March 24th, 2026 5:05 PM Author: Joe Kent is a rabid antisemite ((zurich is stained))
his point was that you pointing out that someone can beat the stock market in a particular year means absolutely nothing. the question is whether you can do it consistently such that your annualized return is, say, 20% or 25% (or even higher). if you can do that, then color me impressed.
something like 97% of active investors (including highly paid mutual fund doods) can't beat the market over 20-30 years. however, everyone will have a year here and there where they beat the market. but that is meaningless.
everything you're saying reminds me of my own outlook when i started learning about investing when i was in college. i quickly lost my ass and learned.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5849224&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49765987) |
 |
Date: March 24th, 2026 5:33 PM Author: A Stripper Named Hegemony
I've lost my ass several times before. I'm not as brand new as alluded to in the clever headline. Obviously it's remarkable if you're in the few who beat the market consistently over time. We call them 'rich people.' Nvidia did in 5 years what the S&P did in 35. And by the way we're not talking about day trading and "having a good year" in the market. We're talking about long term value investing. Look at how bad Tommy's record is at investing. He's a day trader who gambles and he's only up because the market went up overall, but he would have made WAY more money just investing in the S&P and holding. All of his trading and gimmickry was a wildly entertaining haircut on his NW. It didn't have to happen.
But my whole point is that *somebody* somewhere figured out the long term potential of Nvidia years before it blew up and held onto it long enough to make a life altering amount of money. If you have Tommy's investment strategy you're obviously not that guy. Most people aren't that guy. But somebody had an actual concrete idea, ran with it, and long term he was proven right. Anyone could be that guy if you do enough research and have enough experience.
I'm not talking about Freshman Econ 101 shit. I'm not talking about timing the market and day trading and puts and options. I'm talking about value investing which is a time honored tradition for the gigabrained. And yeah obviously most people don't do it, can't, or won't, for whatever reason. But that opportunity is always out there.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5849224&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49766032) |
 |
Date: March 24th, 2026 1:53 PM Author: sealclubber
lol, you idiot
"Date: March 24th, 2026 1:35 PM
Author: :-P (gunneratttt)
half of publicly traded stocks outperform the market, because "the market" refers to the average performance of the entire market."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5849224&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49765389) |
 |
Date: March 24th, 2026 2:37 PM Author: sealclubber
lol, you idiot.
you've gone from being wrong one way to being wrong in another
what was that effect you were talking about?
Date: March 24th, 2026 2:02 PM
Author: :-P(gunneratttt)
yes? do you understand what an average means?
of course because different stocks have different market caps it's not going to be 1/2 the ticker symbols, or big cap companies having an outsized effect on the market average, etc. but half of "the market" will outperform the market average.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5849224&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49765567) |
 |
Date: March 24th, 2026 3:42 PM Author: sealclubber
strike three. you're out, you stupid fuck
the only one challenging you for king retard in this thread is the op and your painfully idiotic discussion branches above
Approximately 40% to 50% of individual stocks outperform the broader market in any given year, making it roughly a coin-flip on an annual basis. However, over long-term periods (10–20 years), only about 10% to 20% of individual stocks or active funds consistently beat the market, as a few top performers drive most of the gains.
Dimensional Fund Advisors
Dimensional Fund Advisors
+2
Key findings on stock market outperformance:
Long-Term Odds: Over 20-year periods, only about a fifth of stocks survive and outperform the market.
Active Manager Performance: Roughly 92% of active fund managers fail to outperform the S&P 500 over 20-year periods.
Concentrated Returns: A small number of top performers drive the market; for instance, excluding the top 25% of stocks can result in negative overall market returns.
Concentration Risk: In some years, a tiny fraction of stocks (e.g., top 10) can generate a massive portion of the total market return, as seen in 2023.
Dimensional Fund Advisors
Dimensional Fund Advisors
+3
Why Most Stocks Underperform
The stock market index return is typically skewed by a few massive winners. While the index might show a strong positive return, the "average" individual stock often performs worse than the index itself because a few stellar performers pull the index upward.
Morningstar
Morningstar
+1
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5849224&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49765786) |
 |
Date: March 24th, 2026 3:52 PM Author: :-P (gunneratttt)
"Approximately 40% to 50% of individual stocks outperform the broader market"
wow, you mean exactly what im saying?
i didnt say that half the market *CONSISTENTLY* outperforms the market forever. i said, clearly, that approximately half a population outperforms the *average*. obviously that means during whatever time period it's the average of. not in perpetuity you moron.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5849224&forum_id=2\u0026show=month#49765817) |
|
|