\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Opus 4.5 is disgustingly good

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to...
Bearded Fighting Codepig
  11/29/25
The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model ...
cocky histrionic toaster institution
  11/29/25
yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit...
Bearded Fighting Codepig
  11/29/25
...
yapping doctorate sanctuary
  11/29/25
My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP mode...
primrose pocket flask
  11/29/25
lol jfc
Bearded Fighting Codepig
  11/29/25
...
spectacular principal's office jap
  11/29/25
wow
Deranged Duck-like Kitty
  12/07/25
lmao
Stimulating Slap-happy Genital Piercing Philosopher-king
  12/07/25
...
spectacular principal's office jap
  11/30/25
it truly is insane - what a gift
Deranged Duck-like Kitty
  12/07/25
explain what cause you to reach this conclusion
Walnut Theatre Gaming Laptop
  12/07/25
Mental illness
crawly jet-lagged menage
  12/07/25
I need an AI agent to work with
violet spot
  12/07/25
Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time ho...
cocky histrionic toaster institution
  12/21/25
People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a ...
cheese-eating psychic casino
  12/21/25
They are always claiming this for new model releases and no ...
yapping doctorate sanctuary
  12/21/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: Bearded Fighting Codepig

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to pilot AI systems

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49470203)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 1:37 PM
Author: cocky histrionic toaster institution

The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model that is a couple months old). LLM progress isn’t really slowing down in a meaningful way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49470302)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:10 PM
Author: Bearded Fighting Codepig

yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit good..like it was better than opus 4.1 for most things and competitive with gpt5. I still like gpt 5.1 and the 5 pro api best as a generalist but opus 4.5 is insane for coding and also its much better at critiquing something you give it. the other LLMs are still too nice, but it has no problem giving harsh criticism and arguing against you. GPT 5.1 is better than 5 for this but still a bit weak compared to claude

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49470392)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:12 PM
Author: yapping doctorate sanctuary



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49470405)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:13 PM
Author: primrose pocket flask

My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP models from gpt4o and I want to kill myself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49470410)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:49 PM
Author: Bearded Fighting Codepig

lol jfc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49470540)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:50 PM
Author: spectacular principal's office jap



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49470543)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:17 AM
Author: Deranged Duck-like Kitty

wow

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49491040)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:32 AM
Author: Stimulating Slap-happy Genital Piercing Philosopher-king

lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49491074)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 30th, 2025 1:14 AM
Author: spectacular principal's office jap



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49471468)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:19 AM
Author: Deranged Duck-like Kitty

it truly is insane - what a gift

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49491048)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:23 AM
Author: Walnut Theatre Gaming Laptop

explain what cause you to reach this conclusion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49491063)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:50 AM
Author: crawly jet-lagged menage

Mental illness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49491106)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:44 AM
Author: violet spot

I need an AI agent to work with

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49491097)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 12:59 PM
Author: cocky histrionic toaster institution

Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time horizon task. this benchmark measures the task length (in terms of human work time) that models can do with SWE/AI research type projects. big increase over 5.1 max, which was 2 hours 53 minutes and faster than the overall trend of doubling every 7 months. with any luck, models will be capable of substantially automating AI research before 2030 and set off an intelligence explosion.

https://metr.org/blog/2025-03-19-measuring-ai-ability-to-complete-long-tasks/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49527643)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:47 PM
Author: cheese-eating psychic casino

People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a few days ago

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49527733)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:53 PM
Author: yapping doctorate sanctuary

They are always claiming this for new model releases and no objective evidence ever materializes for it. It’s almost certainly a psychological bias rather than reality. There is substantial variation in how models respond to a particular problem just based on how they are prompted. It’s hard for a user to reliably measure model capabilities over time based on intuition alone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49527743)