US Asians that is 🤣.

However US Wypipo are pretty good at #6, by far the smartest whites in the world

And surprisingly a lot of the world is dumber / less educated than US Blacks. Lmao at Greece, no wonder RSF likes it there so much

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783971&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49331377)

https://www.edwardconard.com/macro-roundup/breaking-down-the-2022-pisa-math-results-by-subpopulation-cremieuxrecueil-finds-that-us-asians-and-whites-topped-the-charts-scoring-on-par-with-top-international-performers/?view=detail

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783971&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49332178)

I checked OECD / U.S. data, and I **did not find credible evidence** that U.S. White students in PISA 2022 “scored on par with top international performers” in mathematics in the way the author claims. The claim seems overstated or inaccurate when compared with available data.

Here’s what I found + what the data suggests:

---

## 🔍 What the official PISA / U.S. data say

* The U.S. average score in PISA 2022 mathematics was **465**, compared to the OECD average ~ 472. ([gpseducation.oecd.org][1])

* The U.S. report does **not publish subgroup means** (e.g. by race/ethnicity) in the main country fact sheets in a way that shows White or Asian U.S. students matching top-performing nations. The U.S. technical notes do provide data on proportions by race / ethnicity and allow disaggregation, but I did **not find a table** in the OECD’s published documents that shows “White U.S. student average math score ≈ Singapore / East Asia top levels.” ([National Center for Education Statistics][2])

* The U.S. PISA 2022 technical report and the U.S. fact sheet emphasize that performance declined from 2018, and U.S. students are roughly near the OECD average in math (below many top East Asian systems). ([OECD][3])

* The U.S. PISA 2022 factsheet states that **7% of U.S. students** reached the “top performers” level (Level 5 or 6) in math. ([OECD][3])

---

## ⚠ Why the author’s claim is dubious

* To *match* “top international performers” (e.g. Singapore, China, South Korea) would require scores substantially above U.S. averages, likely surpassing 550–580 in math. U.S. averages (even for advantaged or racial subgroups) are far below that in published data.

* The author may be using **unpublished subgroup estimates**, extrapolations, or selection of **privileged subpopulations** (e.g. highest economic quartile, certain states) to inflate the claim.

* The claim ignores **statistical margins of error** and possible biases in sample weighting etc.

* The author uses broad language (“scored on par with top international performers”) without providing the exact data source for subgroup means, raising suspicion about cherry-picking.

---

## ✅ Verdict

* The claim that **U.S. White students in PISA 2022 “scored on par with top international performers”** is **not supported** by the available, published PISA / U.S. data.

* It’s possible certain subgroups (e.g. high-SES White students in specific states) might approach top-tier international system scores, but **no publicly verified national dataset** supports the broad claim.

* So, overall, the author seems to exaggerate or mislead regarding the White subgroup’s performance relative to international leaders.

If you want, I can try to dig into the raw PISA database (OECD microdata) to see subgroup means (e.g. White U.S. students) and present you those numbers. Do you want me to attempt that?

[1]: https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry=USA&topic=PI&treshold=10&utm_source=chatgpt.com "Education GPS - United States - Student performance (PISA 2022)"

[2]: https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/pisa2022/technical-notes/index.asp?utm_source=chatgpt.com "PISA 2022 U.S. Results - Mathematics Literacy"

[3]: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/11/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_2fca04b9/united-states_243107b0/a78ba65a-en.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com "[PDF] PISA 2022 Results - OECD"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783971&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49332193)

https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4878636&mc=23&forum_id=2

https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4792471&mc=13&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783971&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49332196)

https://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5779393&mc=24&forum_id=2

570 (mean GMAT for White U.S. citizens)

619 (mean GMAT for Asian American U.S. citizens)

586 (mean GMAT for Indian residents)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783971&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49332207)

Asian Americans: 155

Birdshit Americans: 151.1

India: 160

Before u say SMALL SAMPLE, saar! India had 62k test takers, the ENTIRE furking USA had not much more at 85k, actually Birdshits were only 41k so India had MOAR test takers ljl

https://www.ets.org/pdfs/gre/snapshot.pdf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783971&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49332208)

Get a fucking life you pathetic loser

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783971&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49332220)

and i provide stats here saar, u can rebut stats if u so upset but u cannot without importing an H1b from india to help u

EAT STALE PARATHA and die

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783971&forum_id=2\u0026show=my#49332226)