\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Is it too rude to call the opposing side's argument "silly" in a brief?

It is silly. I would say it is retarded or brain dead but th...
big messiness twinkling uncleanness
  12/06/25
I wouldn't.
swashbuckling police squad
  12/06/25
great idea, but also quanitfy it with maybe "really&quo...
Mind-boggling Nursing Home
  12/06/25
Maybe go so far as to call it "gay"
swashbuckling police squad
  12/06/25
...
Ebony Keepsake Machete
  12/06/25
pejoratives only make your own arguments appear weaker and y...
Appetizing Alcoholic Office
  12/06/25
People say ridiculous all the time. How is silly a bridge to...
big messiness twinkling uncleanness
  12/06/25
bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including ...
Appetizing Alcoholic Office
  12/06/25
...
claret flirting abode
  12/06/25
...
claret flirting abode
  12/06/25
use "unserious" instead
Jade rough-skinned hairy legs
  12/06/25
could also use 'baseless'. This is one of my favs
Mind-boggling Nursing Home
  12/06/25
Nonsensical
swashbuckling police squad
  12/06/25
"meritless, baseless, and nonsensical"
iridescent nowag
  12/06/25
"X argument is not supported by the law" (see, e.g...
Appetizing Alcoholic Office
  12/06/25
"not supported by the law" is dumb. always laugh w...
iridescent nowag
  12/06/25
that's fair, it is a catch-all that isnt very descriptive. b...
Appetizing Alcoholic Office
  12/07/25
Because it’s a meaningless catch all, it’s no be...
iridescent nowag
  12/07/25
Seems cheap
cordovan vibrant circlehead
  12/06/25
wacky
Histrionic azure liquid oxygen plaza
  12/06/25
finna make shiz up
swashbuckling police squad
  12/06/25
“trooned out”
lake soul-stirring immigrant sandwich
  12/06/25
frankly, opposing counsel’s argument is deadass specio...
Light Abusive Wagecucks National Security Agency
  12/06/25
the court should low key consider sanctions no cap frfr
Appetizing Alcoholic Office
  12/06/25
Did I cross the line when I said Plaintiff was "flat ou...
big messiness twinkling uncleanness
  12/06/25
Drop a few "Not so."s.
Avocado senate
  12/06/25
"Opponent's argument is like Tim Walz."
chrome vivacious toilet seat
  12/06/25
...
big messiness twinkling uncleanness
  12/06/25
"nigger"
Cheese-eating excitant toaster gas station
  12/07/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:29 PM
Author: big messiness twinkling uncleanness

It is silly. I would say it is retarded or brain dead but that seems clearly over the line.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488467)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:32 PM
Author: swashbuckling police squad

I wouldn't.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488479)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:34 PM
Author: Mind-boggling Nursing Home

great idea, but also quanitfy it with maybe "really" silly, or perhaps "super" silly so they dont get confused.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488493)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:37 PM
Author: swashbuckling police squad

Maybe go so far as to call it "gay"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488503)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:46 PM
Author: Ebony Keepsake Machete



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488525)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:37 PM
Author: Appetizing Alcoholic Office

pejoratives only make your own arguments appear weaker and you look worse to the court.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488501)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:47 PM
Author: big messiness twinkling uncleanness

People say ridiculous all the time. How is silly a bridge too far.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488531)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:56 PM
Author: Appetizing Alcoholic Office

bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including "ridiculous."

there is no advantage to doing this. if the argument is ridiculous the court won't have to be told that. if they agree with you your use will either have a neutral or negative impression. so there's no advantage.

tcr instead of just saying "it's silly" is to highlight its silliness instead of just saying it outright. there are plenty of ways you can shit on OC's arguments without just saying "they're silly." if it truly is silly this shouldn't be difficult.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488562)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:20 PM
Author: claret flirting abode



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488652)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:19 PM
Author: claret flirting abode



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488646)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:48 PM
Author: Jade rough-skinned hairy legs

use "unserious" instead

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488536)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: Mind-boggling Nursing Home

could also use 'baseless'. This is one of my favs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488556)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:58 PM
Author: swashbuckling police squad

Nonsensical

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488565)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 8:02 PM
Author: iridescent nowag

"meritless, baseless, and nonsensical"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49489724)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:00 PM
Author: Appetizing Alcoholic Office

"X argument is not supported by the law" (see, e.g. fundamental case that every idiot knows).

recently ACB cited marbury when addressing a KTJ dissent that was absolutely ruthless. that's far more effective and devasting than saying "KTJ's dissent is silly." don't say it's silly, show why it's silly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488570)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 8:03 PM
Author: iridescent nowag

"not supported by the law" is dumb. always laugh when people say that. it could mean a million things. u saying they got the law wrong? applied the facts to the law wrong? etc.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49489727)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:00 AM
Author: Appetizing Alcoholic Office

that's fair, it is a catch-all that isnt very descriptive. but itt we don't know why candy ride thinks OCs argument is silly so a catch-all is appropriate.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49491128)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:10 AM
Author: iridescent nowag

Because it’s a meaningless catch all, it’s no better than silly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49491145)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:01 PM
Author: cordovan vibrant circlehead

Seems cheap

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488572)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:17 PM
Author: Histrionic azure liquid oxygen plaza

wacky

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488636)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:18 PM
Author: swashbuckling police squad

finna make shiz up

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488642)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:19 PM
Author: lake soul-stirring immigrant sandwich

“trooned out”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488651)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:25 PM
Author: Light Abusive Wagecucks National Security Agency

frankly, opposing counsel’s argument is deadass specious, unsupported by precedent or statute, and should be afforded no weight by the court

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488669)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:25 PM
Author: Appetizing Alcoholic Office

the court should low key consider sanctions no cap frfr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49488673)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:23 PM
Author: big messiness twinkling uncleanness

Did I cross the line when I said Plaintiff was "flat out wrong"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49489067)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:27 PM
Author: Avocado senate

Drop a few "Not so."s.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49489083)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:28 PM
Author: chrome vivacious toilet seat

"Opponent's argument is like Tim Walz."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49489090)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:33 PM
Author: big messiness twinkling uncleanness



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49489103)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:26 AM
Author: Cheese-eating excitant toaster gas station

"nigger"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted",#49491178)