Claude Opus 4.6 is a better brief writer than most v10 mid-levels ALREADY
| .....,.,......,,.,.......,.,.....,... | 02/18/26 | | the gay scientist | 02/18/26 | | Lab Diamond Dallas Trump | 02/18/26 | | the gay scientist | 02/18/26 | | Lab Diamond Dallas Trump | 02/18/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 18th, 2026 4:12 PM
Author: .....,.,......,,.,.......,.,.....,...
Try it if you have a brief where everything is public, like a motion to dismiss or something like that. Upload the brief you are responding to and like the 4 or 5 most important cases. Ask it to give you its initial impressions on strengths and weaknesses and outline the brief. Give it a little feedback. Then ask it to write the brief, one section at a time. Give it a little feedback and ask for tweaks as you go.
Within an hour or so you will have a better draft than the average v10 4th year would give you after like a full week of work.
It's shocking how smart it is. Like literally took my breath away. The limitations are that you have to feed it the source docs and cases and you can only upload so many documents. But presumably soon it will be able to take unlimited docs and be trained on the full west law database or equivalent -- and it will be even smarter by then!
First time I've really started to honestly believe most lawyers are done here.
Also, as an aside, ChatGPT isn't close to doing this and still makes up stupid shit even when you spoon feed it the source docs.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836062&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted#49678555) |
Date: February 18th, 2026 4:14 PM Author: the gay scientist
My lawyer friends won't believe me about AI
Newest Claude and gpt 5.3 are both really powerful but you have to shell out the money for enough inference to get the payoff
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836062&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted#49678558) |
|
|