What is James Comey thinking right now?
| Ungodly Snowy Locus Stain | 11/09/16 | | amber adulterous business firm | 11/09/16 | | Startling alpha home | 11/24/25 | | Startling alpha home | 11/24/25 | | Startling alpha home | 11/24/25 | | Startling alpha home | 11/24/25 | | Startling alpha home | 11/26/25 | | Mildly Autistic School Cafeteria Potus | 11/26/25 | | Startling alpha home | 11/26/25 | | Startling alpha home | 11/27/25 | | Startling alpha home | 11/27/25 | | Startling alpha home | 12/01/25 | | Startling alpha home | 12/02/25 | | nyuug | 12/03/25 | | nyuug | 12/04/25 | | nyuug | 12/05/25 | | nyuug | 12/07/25 | | nyuug | 12/08/25 | | vigorous headpube | 11/24/25 | | Hairraiser Deranged Chapel Boiling Water | 11/26/25 | | Charcoal hunting ground sound barrier | 11/27/25 | | scarlet sickened mediation sweet tailpipe | 11/24/25 | | Mildly Autistic School Cafeteria Potus | 11/26/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: November 27th, 2025 10:35 PM Author: Charcoal hunting ground sound barrier
No. The Judge addressed this in the order of dismissal:
Generally, “[t]he return of an indictment tolls the statute of limitations on the charges contained in the indictment.” United States v. Ojedokun, 16 F.4th 1091, 1109 (4th Cir. 2021). “An invalid indictment,” however, “cannot serve to block the door of limitations as it swings closed.” United States v. Crysopt Corp., 781 F. Supp. 375, 378 (D. Md. 1991) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Gillespie, 666 F. Supp. 1137, 1141 (N.D. Ill. 1987) (“[A] valid indictment insulates from statute-of-limitations problems any refiling of the same charges during the pendency of that valid indictment (that is, the superseding of a valid indictment). But if the earlier indictment is void, there is no legitimate peg on which to hang such a judicial limitations-tolling result.” (emphasis in original)).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3419727&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted#49466883) |
|
|