So will Obama be forced to resign over this Benghazi stuff or no
| shaky sable dilemma | 05/10/13 | | useless corner | 05/10/13 | | grizzly lay | 05/10/13 | | Thriller alcoholic market juggernaut | 05/10/13 | | Erotic cumskin senate | 05/10/13 | | Erotic cumskin senate | 05/10/13 | | Alcoholic national round eye | 05/10/13 | | shaky sable dilemma | 05/10/13 | | Alcoholic national round eye | 05/10/13 | | insane french chef hell | 05/10/13 | | talking violet point | 05/11/13 | | rusted rebellious coffee pot blood rage | 05/10/13 | | khaki stain tattoo | 05/10/13 | | Ruby flatulent roommate | 05/10/13 | | exhilarant nibblets mad cow disease | 05/10/13 | | lavender lascivious associate | 05/10/13 | | Charismatic bearded wrinkle affirmative action | 05/10/13 | | insane french chef hell | 05/10/13 | | trip thirsty sanctuary clown | 05/10/13 | | Opaque preventive strike menage | 07/14/13 | | Opaque preventive strike menage | 07/14/13 | | lfo | 12/08/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 10th, 2013 2:26 PM Author: grizzly lay
Its just the right wing hype machine, but it would be pretty lolzy if the House impeached him. obviously no way the senate convicts, but it would be great for the lulz.
sadly John Boehner is no Newton Leroy Gingrich, so this won't happen.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2252567&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted#23172141) |
Date: May 10th, 2013 2:31 PM Author: Thriller alcoholic market juggernaut
no idea but this is the title of the article on the front of foxnews.com:
AP/Reuters
"Newly released emails are raising additional questions about the Obama administration's story-line on the Benghazi attack, showing top-level efforts to downplay terrorism ahead of public statements by UN Ambassador Susan Rice."
assuming this is true, i think it's just sort of a big "so what".
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2252567&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted#23172153)
|
Date: May 10th, 2013 2:51 PM Author: Erotic cumskin senate
Love the idiot-liberal Google+ comments on the story:
"I agree totally with you, +Joshua Deighan The problem is that the USA has a history of, and believes in, adversarial justice, which by definition means that SOMEONE must bear the blame, irrespective of facts. Once a "blame" target has been identified, then the looney-tunes from BOTH sides have a "valid" argument (in their minds) of why "X" (the blame) is lousy for America, or his/her political party, or why all OTHER bad things can be attributed to him/her/it."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2252567&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted#23172257) |
|
|