The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
"Counsel, you're saying vehicular manslaughter doesn't apply to 'Chads'"?
| Vexatious pro se prole | 12/25/25 |
| Vexatious pro se prole | 12/25/25 |
| A Husserlian Transcendental Ego If You Can Keep It | 12/25/25 |
| Vexatious pro se prole | 12/25/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 25th, 2025 8:29 PM Author: Vexatious pro se prole "Your honor, the legislature must clearly state when they intend the law to apply to Chads. And they haven't done so here" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5814157&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted#49539797) |
Date: December 25th, 2025 8:30 PM Author: Vexatious pro se prole Prosecutor: "Your honor, he hasn't even established his client is a Chad. The jury must decide this. We need discovery" Def: "No your honor, once we make a prima facie case that he--that he has either abs or hunter eyes, it's their--it's the state's burden to rebut it beyond a reasonable doubt."
|
 |
Date: December 25th, 2025 8:32 PM Author: A Husserlian Transcendental Ego If You Can Keep It Prosecutor: "Your honor the standard is preponderance of the evidence, and precedent clearly states that any Norwood level greater than II is dispositive in these cases." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5814157&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted#49539804) |
|
Date: December 25th, 2025 8:44 PM Author: Vexatious pro se prole The Court: "But don't all murderers become Chads? How do I resolve the hybristophilia issue?" Pros: "Only serial killers your honor." Def: "Actually a recent Fifth Circuit case interpreting a nearly identical statute held there's a presumption of hybristophilia if the vehicle was worth over $65K" |