XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| ruddy base | 07/04/25 | | plum chapel | 07/04/25 | | primrose thriller macaca | 07/04/25 | | Puce French Tattoo Gas Station | 07/04/25 | | ruddy base | 07/04/25 | | yellow alcoholic dilemma cuckoldry | 07/04/25 | | plum chapel | 07/04/25 | | yellow alcoholic dilemma cuckoldry | 07/04/25 | | plum chapel | 07/04/25 | | yellow alcoholic dilemma cuckoldry | 07/04/25 | | plum chapel | 07/05/25 | | ruddy base | 07/05/25 | | Irate blathering sweet tailpipe | 07/05/25 | | ruddy base | 07/06/25 | | Irate blathering sweet tailpipe | 07/05/25 | | ruddy base | 07/05/25 | | Irate blathering sweet tailpipe | 07/06/25 | | Dun Digit Ratio | 07/06/25 | | Bateful outnumbered trump supporter filthpig | 07/05/25 | | Dashing Smoky Public Bath | 07/06/25 | | Bateful outnumbered trump supporter filthpig | 07/06/25 | | yellow alcoholic dilemma cuckoldry | 07/06/25 | | Bateful outnumbered trump supporter filthpig | 07/06/25 | | yellow alcoholic dilemma cuckoldry | 07/06/25 | | Stirring lilac station | 07/05/25 | | sickened zombie-like karate | 07/06/25 | | floppy nursing home feces | 07/05/25 | | violet sandwich | 07/06/25 | | yellow alcoholic dilemma cuckoldry | 07/06/25 | | Copper business firm antidepressant drug | 07/06/25 | | yellow alcoholic dilemma cuckoldry | 07/06/25 | | 180 obsidian haunted graveyard | 07/06/25 | | ruddy base | 07/06/25 | | ruddy base | 07/06/25 | | ruddy base | 07/06/25 | | Dun Digit Ratio | 07/06/25 | | ruddy base | 07/06/25 | | Dashing Smoky Public Bath | 07/06/25 | | ruddy base | 07/06/25 | | Copper business firm antidepressant drug | 07/06/25 | | sickened zombie-like karate | 07/06/25 | | yellow alcoholic dilemma cuckoldry | 07/06/25 | | out-of-control indian lodge famous landscape painting | 07/06/25 | | flushed voyeur | 07/06/25 | | jet kitty | 07/06/25 | | flushed voyeur | 07/06/25 | | Provocative cobalt senate | 07/06/25 | | Bateful outnumbered trump supporter filthpig | 07/06/25 | | chartreuse marketing idea | 07/06/25 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 02/21/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: yellow alcoholic dilemma cuckoldry
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: yellow alcoholic dilemma cuckoldry
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: yellow alcoholic dilemma cuckoldry
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: yellow alcoholic dilemma cuckoldry
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: violet sandwich
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: Dun Digit Ratio
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: sickened zombie-like karate
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026show=posted#49076800) |
|
|