seems like "weight loss" should be Solved by now
| Thriller roommate piazza | 12/16/25 | | splenetic hateful school | 12/16/25 | | Silver floppy national coffee pot | 12/16/25 | | Thriller roommate piazza | 12/16/25 | | Silver floppy national coffee pot | 12/16/25 | | Big metal address | 12/16/25 | | Thriller roommate piazza | 12/16/25 | | Big metal address | 12/16/25 | | Azure filthy market pervert | 12/16/25 | | light rigor queen of the night | 12/16/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 16th, 2025 9:30 AM Author: Thriller roommate piazza
Even setting aside ozempic etc. with the amount of effort and money people dump into random weight loss strategies every year you would think they'd be able to come up with a specific objective list saying ok, people who do x y or z lose weight. People who do a b or c don't.
idk is this something like the theoretical 500 mpg carburator where Weight Watchers purchased the patent for weight loss strategies and is keeping them hidden to insure continued $ub$cription money from chubby desperate moms?
feel free to discuss itt
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5810884&forum_id=2\u0026show=today",#49513303) |
Date: December 16th, 2025 9:33 AM Author: splenetic hateful school
there are many effective weight loss strategies. The important parts are
- diagnosing the underlying issues which caused weight gain in the first place
- finding a plan that the individual person wants to stick to
"Calories In Calories Out" is an oversimplification but it is the Truth
also you're correct that the weight loss companies are incentivized to not provide permanent solutions
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5810884&forum_id=2\u0026show=today",#49513311) |
Date: December 16th, 2025 9:35 AM Author: Silver floppy national coffee pot
Solved for everyone except broke and lazy people.
Lazy + rich = Ozempic
Active + rich = Ozempic or fitness.
Lazy + poor = fat
Active + poor = Exercise, calorie restriction.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5810884&forum_id=2\u0026show=today",#49513316) |
Date: December 16th, 2025 9:41 AM Author: Big metal address
It has been solved lol
It just sucks to live at a caloric deficit so very few people do it
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5810884&forum_id=2\u0026show=today",#49513330) |
 |
Date: December 16th, 2025 9:48 AM Author: Thriller roommate piazza
this is slightly autistic no offense. obviously the *math* is solved, I'm not disputing that. it's the strategy I'm interested in.
good talk tho thanks for the contribution👍
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5810884&forum_id=2\u0026show=today",#49513353) |
 |
Date: December 16th, 2025 9:52 AM Author: Big metal address
It's calories in calories out
People successfully lose weight doing all kinds of random goofy gimmicks. All that matters is caloric deficit. That's what's actually making them lose weight. You just have to Eat Less
But living at a caloric deficit sucks. You feel shitty. That's why people don't do it. Also they like eating. There are lots of people who try Ozempic and then quit because they prefer to eat and be fat than not eat and become skinny even if the drug makes them not feel shitty for being at a caloric deficit
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5810884&forum_id=2\u0026show=today",#49513365) |
|
|