The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| bull headed hairless house | 01/06/26 | | Drab Home | 01/06/26 | | cracking parlour | 01/06/26 | | Drab Home | 01/06/26 | | cracking parlour | 01/06/26 | | Drab Home | 01/06/26 | | bull headed hairless house | 01/06/26 | | Drab Home | 01/06/26 | | bull headed hairless house | 01/06/26 | | Cruel-hearted stock car | 01/07/26 | | razzle-dazzle cruise ship pocket flask | 01/06/26 | | Alcoholic school tank | 01/06/26 | | cracking parlour | 01/06/26 | | amethyst fragrant athletic conference | 01/06/26 | | cracking parlour | 01/06/26 | | primrose abusive indian lodge dysfunction | 01/06/26 | | multi-colored bat-shit-crazy puppy | 01/06/26 | | carmine pit indirect expression | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Drab Home
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49568134) |
|
|