Are they going to give up on having families of their own? Settle down with someone much older who’s willing to give it a shot? There probably aren’t that many guys our own age who want kids and want to be on a 38 year old woman’s timeline.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5789422&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49371608)

God will punish you

Good flame though

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5789422&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49371734)

How’s your pair bonding sprint with a chick that’s taken 80+ dicks going

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5789422&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49371827)

This is real

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5789422&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49372296)

Tbf there are some foreign ones that are fun for a few weeks to months but they know the drill

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5789422&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49371924)

Was this written by a faggot?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5789422&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49372089)

Sure, it's possible he didn't really like her or was in the early stages of something or... But, it would have taken next to nothing to ask him for a drink, and she wouldn't even do that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5789422&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49372031)

Any relationship with the chick not more heavily into the guy is 10000% doomed

If by pursue you mean she has total agreeableness then yes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5789422&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49373077)

"For the table, ma'am?"

"No, just for me."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5789422&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49372650)

expect all ads to be aimed at women driving aggressively alone in their car on the road to nowhere, pulling a man behind them to explore exotic locations

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5789422&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49371902)

Radical feminist Kate Mulvey is alone and childless at age 63

10/24/2025 Wintery Knight 1 Comment

In 2018, I wrote about a 54-year-old feminist who spent her entire life savings on a dating agency to find a rich husband. Kate spent her entire life writing columns to tell young women to live feminist lifestyles: get easy degrees, work easy jobs, spend money on fun and travel, get cosmetic surgeries, disrespect male leadership, and have lots of casual sex. How is she doing at age 63? Let’s find out.

Let’s first review my post from 2018, in part, and see what this woman was all about.

A couple of years ago, I too joined an expensive matchmaking agency. I had just come out of a seven year relationship, and was on the wrong side of 50.

I soon tired of online dating and receiving messages from over weight baldies who peppered their emails with childish emojis. I hankered to find Mr Right-for-me, a man who was suitably educated and a successful professional.

And so this is how I found myself, throwing money (my entire savings to be precise) to an upmarket matchmaking agency in central London. The agency claimed to filter out the undesirables, the mediocre and give clients the personal touch, so I handed over the hefty sum of £6,000.

So, just a few things about this lady Kate Mulvey. She has made some decisions that I find very unwise.

I documented my findings in my previous post:

she has no useful degrees – she paid for useless degrees in Italian and French, instead of studying something useful, like computer science or nursing or petroleum engineering. Her “writing” is all about fashion, dating and “lifestyles”

her opinion on children: “uppity children take your time, emotions and energy” – she sees children as a detriment to her highest priority (her career). She says “I, however, have lived a life of unfettered freedom to take on projects, write books and travel”

she had loads of entertaining men “beating a path to [her] door” when she was younger

she spend thousands of pounds on plastic surgery

she blames her lack of marriage success on her being “brainier” than men

she turned down men who wanted to marry her, as late as age 33

her book is called “Accidental Singleton” because her approach to life – anti-marriage hedonism – has accidentally left her single and penniless at age 54

So, this woman, who scorns the leadership of men, made very bad decisions. Her columns are filled with constant bragging about how much smarter she is than men – men who have made far better decisions and achieved much greater prosperity than she has.

Here is the latest article, in which she explains what feminism told her to do with her life, and what that got her.

She writes:

I’m convinced that the reason I’m still booking a table for one at the age of 63 instead of having settled with a significant other is because, like so many women of my generation, feminism has ruined my love life. Instead of empowering us, those ideals of the second-wave feminists made us believe marriage and domesticity were to be avoided like the plague and that men were competition rather than partners.

[…]I had always imagined I would end up married with two wonderful children and living in a house in the countryside. I have paid a hefty price for my so-called liberation.

Act like men – demonize housework and family:

I was 17, and a pupil at Godolphin and Latymer – one of Britain’s most academic institutions – when I was introduced to the Women’s Liberation movement. It offered such hope and excitement, and we spent our lunch breaks soaking up the feminist mantras of Germaine Greer and Betty Friedan: “Act like men,” they cried as they burnt their bras and demonised housework and the family.

Recreational sex with hot pro-abortion bad boys who don’t judge:

Another thing I regret deeply is my tally of one-night stands when I was younger.

[..]My generation of women were encouraged to “have sex like a man” – in other words have casual sex…

The number of partners that a person (man or woman) has had before marriage is related to their likelihood of initiating divorce. So, someone like Kate Mulvey would be a high risk of divorce. Also, smart men don’t sign up for marriage to women who tell them that “my money is my money, and your money is our money“.

So, she spent her life telling young women to follow feminism, like she did. But are Christian leaders telling young women anything different? Many socially conservative Christian leaders believe in “servant leadership”, which means that men serve, and women lead. Instead of confronting lies and evil, men have to take out the trash, and dispense cash on demand for his wife’s handbags and travel.

Many social conservative Christians define masculinity as “men using their strength to benefit women”. In contrast, my wise advisor Dina taught me that masculinity is demonstrated when a man opposes lies and evil, and doesn’t let a woman distract him from those goals with her sex appeal. Dina would say that Christian men should only protect and provide for Christian women who are helpful to men, and led men take the lead to product results for the Boss. So, men should judge women. They should measure them, and choose good ones. And the job of Christian leaders is to produce women that good men want.

As I’ve blogged about before, there are many reasons why good men will be cautious about marrying feminists. Men are realizing that women today are not the same as their mothers and grandmothers. They don’t offer the same value to a marriage-minded man. They don’t respect men as much, and they don’t want to help a man who leads as much. Not only is there the problem of young women being extremely leftist, but there is also the problems of feminized laws, policies and courts being hostile to men. We need Christian leaders who fight against young women’s feminism while they are still young enough to have 4+ children. And we need leaders who fight against laws, policies and courts that are hostile to men.

===

at least Kate Mulvey was a dependable feminist!

https://www.msn.com/en-ie/lifestyle/relationships/i-m-a-single-woman-of-63-and-i-feel-friendless-and-lonely/ss-AA1DnAFF

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5789422&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49372067)

EDIT: My mistake, you said "men"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5789422&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49374409)

“they’ll HAVE to marry us then, right?”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5789422&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49374015)