The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
1970s-era girls - sfw
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 29th, 2025 3:33 PM Author: exciting slate locus https://x.com/Eddie_1412/status/1949955718762643475 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756039&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49140785) |
Date: July 29th, 2025 3:35 PM Author: crimson vivacious messiness Yes to every one (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756039&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49140787) |
 |
Date: July 29th, 2025 3:39 PM Author: Electric dysfunction crackhouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756039&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49140801) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2025 3:37 PM Author: Buff heaven these old boomer lawyers I work with always talk about how awesome girls in the 70s were. All were skinny, horny as fuck, liked to drink, laid back, etc (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756039&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49140793) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2025 3:40 PM Author: Trip godawful sex offender same as when we grew up except for being skinny, horny as fuck, liking to drink, and laid back (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756039&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49140802) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2025 3:41 PM Author: Razzle Blathering Voyeur Nursing Home lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756039&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49140807) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2025 3:57 PM Author: crimson vivacious messiness (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756039&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49140878) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2025 3:40 PM Author: beta office This is AI, the 4th one's forearm is missing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756039&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49140804) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2025 3:42 PM Author: Bonkers cobalt base idea he suggested Good catch. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756039&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49140813) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2025 3:53 PM Author: exciting slate locus Weird how the pic seems so realistic in all other ways but still makes that mistake. Normally when AI shows a group of womens' faces you can tell they used the same basic facial template- not the case here. But it still makes that mistake. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756039&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49140858) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2025 3:57 PM Author: Bonkers cobalt base idea he suggested No, modern AI image generation has made some improvements so unless they're using an outdated model it won't generate the same faces anymore. But for whatever reason they still generate the wrong number of toes and forget arms and stuff. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756039&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49140882) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2025 4:09 PM Author: beta office It looks like a painting, and their legs are all way too perfect. A real candid photo from the 1970s would be much shittier looking. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756039&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49140909) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2025 3:58 PM Author: crimson vivacious messiness I STILL would, even if they're not real. Every. Single. One. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756039&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49140884) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2025 4:12 PM Author: Electric dysfunction crackhouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756039&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49140922) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2025 3:41 PM Author: Bonkers cobalt base idea he suggested In general, this is an era without stupid styles. By the 80s you got the stupid big hair trend. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756039&forum_id=2\u0026show=today#49140810) |