What is James Comey thinking right now?
| boyish iridescent coldplay fan immigrant | 11/09/16 | | Trip Selfie | 11/09/16 | | beta brethren native | 11/24/25 | | beta brethren native | 11/24/25 | | beta brethren native | 11/24/25 | | beta brethren native | 11/24/25 | | beta brethren native | 11/26/25 | | maize lascivious school knife | 11/26/25 | | beta brethren native | 11/26/25 | | beta brethren native | 11/27/25 | | beta brethren native | 11/27/25 | | beta brethren native | 12/01/25 | | beta brethren native | 12/02/25 | | beta brethren native | 12/03/25 | | beta brethren native | 12/04/25 | | nyuug | 12/05/25 | | nyuug | 12/07/25 | | nyuug | 12/08/25 | | nyuug | 12/10/25 | | Floppy jade stead gay wizard | 11/24/25 | | vibrant friendly grandma | 11/26/25 | | Charismatic Cuckold Plaza | 11/27/25 | | rambunctious clown dopamine | 11/24/25 | | maize lascivious school knife | 11/26/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: November 27th, 2025 10:35 PM Author: Charismatic Cuckold Plaza
No. The Judge addressed this in the order of dismissal:
Generally, “[t]he return of an indictment tolls the statute of limitations on the charges contained in the indictment.” United States v. Ojedokun, 16 F.4th 1091, 1109 (4th Cir. 2021). “An invalid indictment,” however, “cannot serve to block the door of limitations as it swings closed.” United States v. Crysopt Corp., 781 F. Supp. 375, 378 (D. Md. 1991) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Gillespie, 666 F. Supp. 1137, 1141 (N.D. Ill. 1987) (“[A] valid indictment insulates from statute-of-limitations problems any refiling of the same charges during the pendency of that valid indictment (that is, the superseding of a valid indictment). But if the earlier indictment is void, there is no legitimate peg on which to hang such a judicial limitations-tolling result.” (emphasis in original)).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3419727&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49466883) |
|
|