\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Opus 4.5 is disgustingly good

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to...
Chrome Digit Ratio Public Bath
  11/29/25
The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model ...
federal exciting kitty cat karate
  11/29/25
yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit...
Chrome Digit Ratio Public Bath
  11/29/25
...
Mischievous Macaca Trump Supporter
  11/29/25
My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP mode...
brass passionate indirect expression
  11/29/25
lol jfc
Chrome Digit Ratio Public Bath
  11/29/25
...
peach school cafeteria
  11/29/25
wow
fragrant territorial legal warrant spot
  12/07/25
lmao
Plum aphrodisiac bawdyhouse
  12/07/25
...
peach school cafeteria
  11/30/25
it truly is insane - what a gift
fragrant territorial legal warrant spot
  12/07/25
explain what cause you to reach this conclusion
Godawful dysfunction business firm
  12/07/25
Mental illness
pale odious field
  12/07/25
I need an AI agent to work with
umber disrespectful telephone
  12/07/25
Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time ho...
federal exciting kitty cat karate
  12/21/25
People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a ...
hairraiser magical crackhouse
  12/21/25
They are always claiming this for new model releases and no ...
Mischievous Macaca Trump Supporter
  12/21/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: Chrome Digit Ratio Public Bath

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to pilot AI systems

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49470203)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 1:37 PM
Author: federal exciting kitty cat karate

The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model that is a couple months old). LLM progress isn’t really slowing down in a meaningful way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49470302)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:10 PM
Author: Chrome Digit Ratio Public Bath

yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit good..like it was better than opus 4.1 for most things and competitive with gpt5. I still like gpt 5.1 and the 5 pro api best as a generalist but opus 4.5 is insane for coding and also its much better at critiquing something you give it. the other LLMs are still too nice, but it has no problem giving harsh criticism and arguing against you. GPT 5.1 is better than 5 for this but still a bit weak compared to claude

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49470392)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:12 PM
Author: Mischievous Macaca Trump Supporter



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49470405)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:13 PM
Author: brass passionate indirect expression

My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP models from gpt4o and I want to kill myself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49470410)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:49 PM
Author: Chrome Digit Ratio Public Bath

lol jfc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49470540)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:50 PM
Author: peach school cafeteria



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49470543)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:17 AM
Author: fragrant territorial legal warrant spot

wow

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49491040)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:32 AM
Author: Plum aphrodisiac bawdyhouse

lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49491074)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 30th, 2025 1:14 AM
Author: peach school cafeteria



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49471468)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:19 AM
Author: fragrant territorial legal warrant spot

it truly is insane - what a gift

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49491048)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:23 AM
Author: Godawful dysfunction business firm

explain what cause you to reach this conclusion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49491063)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:50 AM
Author: pale odious field

Mental illness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49491106)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:44 AM
Author: umber disrespectful telephone

I need an AI agent to work with

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49491097)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 12:59 PM
Author: federal exciting kitty cat karate

Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time horizon task. this benchmark measures the task length (in terms of human work time) that models can do with SWE/AI research type projects. big increase over 5.1 max, which was 2 hours 53 minutes and faster than the overall trend of doubling every 7 months. with any luck, models will be capable of substantially automating AI research before 2030 and set off an intelligence explosion.

https://metr.org/blog/2025-03-19-measuring-ai-ability-to-complete-long-tasks/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49527643)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:47 PM
Author: hairraiser magical crackhouse

People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a few days ago

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49527733)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:53 PM
Author: Mischievous Macaca Trump Supporter

They are always claiming this for new model releases and no objective evidence ever materializes for it. It’s almost certainly a psychological bias rather than reality. There is substantial variation in how models respond to a particular problem just based on how they are prompted. It’s hard for a user to reliably measure model capabilities over time based on intuition alone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026show=week",#49527743)