The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Bort olds is this what the Clinton sex scandal was like?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 12th, 2025 1:57 PM Author: light aphrodisiac double fault (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49423464) |
Date: November 12th, 2025 2:17 PM Author: lilac bisexual lodge reading party It was a combination of non-stop hilarious late night fodder that this Boomer was pounding teen cunnus, and a lot of sanctimonious outrage in DC because he was corrupting the morals of a generation. But the man basically was the early Trump, deny deny deny then get away with it by sheer charisma. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49423521) |
 |
Date: November 12th, 2025 2:30 PM Author: light aphrodisiac double fault I guess one difference is Clinton’s approval was in the 60s/70s when all that was going on while Trump’s is in the 30s (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49423563) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:21 PM Author: misunderstood brunch (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49443971) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:57 PM Author: Bespoke flickering garrison foreskin how come he never got 50% of the popular vote then? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49444055) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 2:00 PM Author: ivory crackhouse doctorate Are you saying the approval ratings were just made up? What's your actual point?
Almost like there was an third party candidate who got a fair number of votes in both of his elections |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:23 PM Author: Bespoke flickering garrison foreskin almost like 50% of voters voted against Bill Clinton. Why does it matter if it’s for ghwb or some nerd billionaire fag? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445176) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:35 PM Author: ivory crackhouse doctorate again, what is your actual point? do you think the approval ratings were made up? does having <50% of the popular vote change the fact that he was objectively a popular president by the end of his term? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445192) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:39 PM Author: Bespoke flickering garrison foreskin if he was so popular than more people should have voted for him. votes matter more than "approval ratings".
not sure wtf your point with the Perot comment is other than that Clinton, being as unpopular as he was, would probably not have won in 1992 if not for him. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:40 PM Author: ivory crackhouse doctorate you are fucking retarded and should go back to twitter where you came from
"if he's so popular why didnt more people vote for him" "because his popularity increased over time" "but then why didnt they vote for him" |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:43 PM Author: Bespoke flickering garrison foreskin it's a simple question. why did half of the US electorate vote against Bill Clinton if he's as "popular" as you say he was and so many people "approved" of him? he couldn't even crack 50% running against Bob fucking Dole. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445206) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:45 PM Author: ivory crackhouse doctorate repeating the same question over and over instead of addressing actual arguments is for twitterfags. go back to your circlejerk (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445211) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:50 PM Author: Bespoke flickering garrison foreskin responding in unison with the other shareblue cumfarters with the "achtually it's different bc Perot" npc line is what twitterfags do. maybe you should just answer why that's at all relevant?
I'm probably the only person here who doesn't have a twitter account. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:55 PM Author: ivory crackhouse doctorate "shareblue said it so that must mean it's wrong!" is the epitome of retarded thinking. that doesn't make it any less the actual reason why he did not, in fact, get above 50% of the popular vote. that is actually the singular reason why he didn't get above 50% of the popular vote
and it does nothing to take away your entire line of argument being braindead partisan retard bullshit. you are just looking for anything to point at to distract from clinton very obviously being a popular president by the end of his term. "but then why didn't more people vote for him!" is a red herring |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:58 PM Author: Bespoke flickering garrison foreskin the singular reason is that more than half the voters did not want to vote for him. Sorry this fact upsets you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445231) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:02 PM Author: ivory crackhouse doctorate Sorry that Clinton is the most popular living President! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445237) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:06 PM Author: Bespoke flickering garrison foreskin since you think irrelevant metrics are important. Trump has the lowest usga handicap of any president ever. That is more relevant imo. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445246) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:15 PM Author: ivory crackhouse doctorate Also sorry nobody fell for what you were pretty obviously trying to set up:
"But Trump never got above 50% either!" "That's because the count was fraudulent" |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 9:03 AM Author: Bespoke flickering garrison foreskin you are very stupid. ask shareblue for more better material (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445895) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 9:35 AM Author: ivory crackhouse doctorate lol the most retarded posters always trot out the "thareblue!" when they can't actually think of anything to say
you may want to update your script btw, I don't think there's a "shareblue" anymore |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 2:03 PM Author: arousing theater stage faggot firefighter Please state your awareness of Ross Perot’s campaigns for POTUS in 92 and 96 before I engage you further. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49444068) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:22 PM Author: Bespoke flickering garrison foreskin How does that change the fact that 50%+ of the voters voted against Bill Clinton. If he was so popular then you would think they would vote for him (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445171) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 2:15 PM Author: light aphrodisiac double fault because he ran against legit 3rd party candidate both times who got a double digit percentage of the vote. Trump never had to run against a Perot, and still never won a majority of the vote (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49444093) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:20 PM Author: Bespoke flickering garrison foreskin that doesn’t change the fact that >50% of the voters voted against Clinton (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445169) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:05 PM Author: bistre stead Ross Perot? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445244) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 9:27 AM Author: Bespoke flickering garrison foreskin if bill clinton was so popular then why did people vote for ross perot instead of him? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445938) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:13 PM Author: Hairraiser macaca chapel (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49443937) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:14 PM Author: Razzmatazz church building the late night jokes were 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49443940) |
|
Date: November 12th, 2025 2:18 PM Author: charismatic property jew i remember when the starr report came out, i looked through it for the most salacious bits. searched pdf for cigar (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49423525) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:04 AM Author: light aphrodisiac double fault (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49443505) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:11 PM Author: Razzmatazz church building no, other than the move on freaks, the democrats didn't try and make excuses for Clinton's sleaziness and openly acknowledged he was an inveterate pussy hound. They in fact leaned into his scumbag nature. I still remember listening to Rush, broadcasting live from the impeachment proceedings. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:18 PM Author: ivory crackhouse doctorate I still remember seeing this as a kid https://i.etsystatic.com/26238862/r/il/e28720/7041226981/il_794xN.7041226981_o62c.jpg (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49443961) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:06 PM Author: bistre stead Always forget that move on was named after the Clinton impeachment (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445245) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:32 PM Author: khaki resort skinny woman what was awful about this period was how relentless this was. non stop media stories about this, every newspaper, broadcast, magazine. no XO! something like 85% of america reported major fatigue on this shit but it was salacious enough to keep selling. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:45 PM Author: Bespoke flickering garrison foreskin lol he was literally getting blown by 21 year old interns in the oval office and jamming cigars up their twats (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445212) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 6:41 AM Author: Curious unhinged library filthpig it was a 180 carnival (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445643) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:07 PM Author: bistre stead What was amazing about this period is that it was the 90s (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445247) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 1:51 PM Author: pontificating awkward set It felt like it received more sustained coverage and was a treated as a bigger deal and bigger scandal. That's in large part because there was still a lot of faith and pride in the office of the presidency, so a scandalous affair in the oval office was particularly saliacious and disorienting. Could this even be real? How could he? Now, society is divided, people no longer respect our institutions, and a sex trafficking scandal involving at lest two presidents is not only unsurprising, it's expected. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49444046) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 6:42 AM Author: Curious unhinged library filthpig Remember Bush Jr and Gore both running on "restoring dignity to the White House"?
hahahahaha. that really worked out well |
|
Date: November 24th, 2025 1:30 PM Author: arrogant house wagecucks Well, Bush Jr fucked it up with his bullshit War in Iraq. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49456410) |
|
Date: December 1st, 2025 6:12 AM Author: Razzmatazz church building in hindsight, B and C list neocons did NOT do a good job running the govt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49473633) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:36 PM Author: Trip nudist casino trump supporter if you need to, read the definitive account:
https://www.amazon.com/Death-American-Virtue-Clinton-Starr/dp/0307409457
Starr was a decent man but when the details of the Arkansas land deals got confusing Starr kept expanding the inquiry into all sorts of nonsense. yes, Bill committed perjury and yes Bill sexually assaulted women in ways that Trump never did, but the utter lack of judgment by Starr and his team lead to the death of the Special Prosecutor. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 9:38 PM Author: Trip nudist casino trump supporter also, Bill lied under oath. no one doubts that. ask yourself what would happen if Trump lied under oath that way. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445198) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 6:43 AM Author: Curious unhinged library filthpig Trump never lies. Ever (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445645) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 8:59 AM Author: Trip nudist casino trump supporter Trump lies constantly of course. but he lies like a high pressure salesman. which he is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445883) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:07 PM Author: bistre stead Toobin’s book is great too (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445248) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:03 PM Author: fighting incel It was actually much worse than anything Trump did but the media insisted it was no big deal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445240) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2025 1:28 PM Author: Curious unhinged library filthpig yes, Clinton ran a rape factory on a South Florida island with a child prostitute pimp (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49456399) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:05 PM Author: bistre stead lol, not even close. Half the country has no idea who Epstein even is or what people are talking about.
|
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 6:43 AM Author: Curious unhinged library filthpig Best part: Ken Starr was Epstein's lawyer (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445646) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 9:25 AM Author: Burgundy Sweet Tailpipe Clinton was much more light hearted and entertaining. There we had a President who not only sounded like an Arkansas goober, but who also had a taste for slutty trailer park pussy - Paula Jones was the best. Getting a blowjob from a jewish intern who kept her cum stained blue dress as a souvenir on the advice of her scheming friend was 180. His shrew wife just increased the melodrama. I believe he reportedly said to Monica after jizzing, "I haven't had that in a long time." Every guy in America secretly identified with Bill and wished him well. He managed to keep it going for 18 months. Then he lied about it, saying, "I did not have sex with that woman," which led to accusations that kids were giving and getting more blow jobs because it wasn't "sex." He even got his law license suspended. How can you not love a telenovela like that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445936) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 9:34 AM Author: comical carmine dilemma Yeah I was young and didn't realize how much it resonated with all the still relatively young/middle age boomer guys in sexless marriages at the time. Slick Willy was 180. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49445957) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2025 1:45 PM Author: canary marvelous selfie (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49456469) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2025 2:47 PM Author: Razzmatazz church building it was hilarious. Do you remember the cigar? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49456725) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2025 2:50 PM Author: Burgundy Sweet Tailpipe Yes. That was big news, LOL! For the bort youngsters the story was that Monica stuck it up her pussy then Clinton put it into his mouth and made some comment. I don't know that the comment was ever reported. Seems like it would would be uncomfortable in her cunt. Anyone have experience with that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49456733) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2025 2:54 PM Author: Razzmatazz church building I was in UG at the time and joked about trying it with my GF. She was not amused (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49456749) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 9:38 AM Author: ruby adventurous native What I remember of Clinton was that a sizable number of people, a minority but still sizable, did not like him because they saw in him the epitome of the charismatic two faced high school senior who'd cleverly make everyone look the other way while he got up to no good behind the gym, or if found with his pants down, would charmingly convince people it was actually a good thing and evade punishment (strikingly similar to Gavin Newsom in a sense). That's why he was called Slick Willy. The Republican base in those days were goody two shoes conformists who resented Clinton because he clearly had the fun with his life they never did. That was the origin of the intensity of their hatred for him and it bounced back badly on them when they tried to prosecute him.
Clinton's antics would have had him me-tooed badly 20 years later, but even in the 1990s it still made deep hypocrites out of the feminists of the era. |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 9:41 AM Author: Trip nudist casino trump supporter Nina Burleigh, who covered the Clinton White House for Time and who once said of President Clinton, “I’d be happy to give him [oral sex] just to thank him for keeping abortion legal.”
===
Gloria Steinem would not mount the same vigorous defence of Bill Clinton today that she offered in a controversial 1998 article that downplayed accusations of harassment against the then president, the feminist icon has told the Guardian.
https://www.nytimes.com/1998/03/22/opinion/feminists-and-the-clinton-question.html
|
|
Date: November 24th, 2025 1:38 PM Author: light aphrodisiac double fault Ok but he left office with high approval which peaked at the height of the scandal
https://news.gallup.com/poll/116584/presidential-approval-ratings-bill-clinton.aspx |
|
Date: November 24th, 2025 2:50 PM Author: Razzmatazz church building This. The impeachment was the "Revenge of the Nerds" - here was this Yale/Rhodes Scholar guy who rose through an education meritocracy (not breeding). To make it 10X worse, he was a pot-smoking, draft-dodging pussy hound who banged anything that moved. And he got away with it by just smirking and making some quip. Boiled their fucking blood as dipped his wick in every woman around. The shrew wife made it even more 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49456735) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2025 2:57 PM Author: Burgundy Sweet Tailpipe I liked Slick Willy. I met him in Hot Springs when he was first term governor. I thought he had promise. I had an AR lawlyer friend (now deceased) who told me lots of Clinton stories related to him by the state highway patrol. They would drop Bill off so he could fuck some chick, then when Hillary started looking for him they would page him and come pick him up (pre cell days). Bill and Hillary's fights were legendary even then. I heard from DC friends that when in the White House she used to scream "Motherfucker" at him a lot, and I bet he did some of that, too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49456773) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2025 1:46 PM Author: chestnut shaky legal warrant Did Clinton get caught with any other interns besides Monica Lewinsky (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49456476) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2025 2:45 PM Author: bistre stead You can tell it’s not because 13 days later I have NO IDEA what OP is referring to (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49456713) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2025 2:52 PM Author: pale rigor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5796759&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49456744) |