Take immigration: We see third-world migrants (like some Somali communities) as often lacking alignment with American values. They might exploit welfare systems, resent our history and heroes, view Western culture as oppressive, and—statistically—bring higher rates of violence due to cultural or socioeconomic factors (including lower average IQ in some populations). It’s not about hate; it’s about preserving a cohesive, successful society.

Same with feminism: It sows division between the sexes, discourages productive people from having kids, and accelerates population decline. That vacuum gets filled by third-world demographics, leading to crumbling systems, less innovation, and a less prosperous nation.

But here’s the key: If we’re wrong? If flooding the country with third-world immigrants somehow boosts productivity and unity… if abolishing prisons reduces crime… if exploding transgender policies and feminism build stronger communities, fewer anxieties, more families, and greater overall success… conservatives would ultimately be fine with it. We’d admit defeat because what we value most is America’s thriving not “winning” debates.

FYI, libs: The only way you truly “win” is if these policies destroy the country. If your victories over the years actually make America stronger, we’d concede you were right all along. I bet laying it out like this though makes some of you realize you’re not actually rooting for America’s success at all, you just want conservatives to ‘lose,’ and if that means torching the country along the way, so be it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5826346&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49617315)

Ohh I'm a kike? Then I'd support immigration https://x.com/infolibnews/status/2012321889046196601

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5826346&forum_id=2\u0026show=week#49617331)