And showed that two subjects humans thought weren’t re...	swollen menage	05/26/26
yes	Frisky Mildly Autistic Lodge	05/26/26
It’s Pure Coincidence. See from the outside it just LO...	swollen menage	05/26/26
this is like showing a caveman a working tv and it thinking ...	Frisky Mildly Autistic Lodge	05/26/26
The caveman clutching the club thinks just because they can&...	swollen menage	05/26/26
...	Opaque nibblets whorehouse	05/26/26
Not even people who make LLMs use the whole "it just pr...	multi-colored ivory heaven faggotry	05/26/26
People at the big labs and top researchers might not, but to...	swollen menage	05/26/26
...	multi-colored ivory heaven faggotry	05/26/26
...	Opaque nibblets whorehouse	05/26/26

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:09 AM Author: swollen menage And showed that two subjects humans thought weren’t related are actually just different languages for describing the same thing. See actually what happened was the machine jusf statistically predicted the next token in a way that happened to be correct. It totally has no “understanding” of the math. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901513)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:13 AM Author: Frisky Mildly Autistic Lodge yes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901516)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:19 AM Author: swollen menage It’s Pure Coincidence. See from the outside it just LOOKS like the machine converged on a genius answer but actually it was just a freak statistical accident. If you multiply probabilities across infinite time monkeys on a typewriter could probably do the same. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901522)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:22 AM Author: Frisky Mildly Autistic Lodge this is like showing a caveman a working tv and it thinking the tv is a real person or time traveller or some shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901523)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:32 AM Author: swollen menage The caveman clutching the club thinks just because they can’t see the “person” inside the machine that it had to have come from statistical magic. The reality is that if “predicting the next token" results in a counterexample to an 80 year old conjecture that contradicts the intuition of Paul Erdos, then "token prediction" is functionally indistinguishable from "reasoning." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901537)

Date: May 26th, 2026 2:09 AM Author: Opaque nibblets whorehouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901569)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:31 AM Author: multi-colored ivory heaven faggotry Not even people who make LLMs use the whole "it just predicts the next word" thing anymore (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901535)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:33 AM Author: swollen menage People at the big labs and top researchers might not, but tons of software engineers and Reddit midwits still do. It isn’t even totally wrong at a certain level of description anyway just reductive in a way that strips away almost everything actually important (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901541)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:35 AM Author: multi-colored ivory heaven faggotry (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901545)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:16 AM Author: Opaque nibblets whorehouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2#49901521)