The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Explain the argument Trump’s lawyer is making here
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 20th, 2025 9:01 AM Author: Exhilarant indian lodge nowag https://x.com/gtconway3d/status/1946754763745349797?s=46 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49115976) |
 |
Date: July 20th, 2025 9:03 AM Author: Salmon concupiscible senate maybe its just confusing phrasing? they dont mean it in the tabloid exclusive interview but its actually off record exclusive to ears-only? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49115981) |
Date: July 20th, 2025 9:07 AM Author: scarlet plaza legal warrant Lmao. Trump still hiring shitlawyers I see. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49115995) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 9:09 AM Author: Indecent Burgundy Sandwich Kitty s my bs on i69 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49115999) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2025 11:54 AM Author: scarlet plaza legal warrant cr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49118735) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 9:09 AM Author: Indecent Burgundy Sandwich Kitty poast the whole document. i assume this is from a libel complaint and it is just arguing the material was disseminated, that the "exclusice" language is just awkward and unnecessary, and that youre a TDS retard getting MAF about shit you don't understand (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49115998) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 9:11 AM Author: harsh reading party juggernaut (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116006) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 9:15 AM Author: self-centered laughsome partner (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116017) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 9:39 AM Author: emerald hissy fit Gunner (who doesn’t even like Trump - honestly!) still vigorously defending absolutely anything even remotely connected to Donald dealmaker, I see. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116071) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 9:42 AM Author: Indecent Burgundy Sandwich Kitty i just said it was unncesssry and awkward obeezy. that doesn't change the fact that it appears to just be establishing an element of the case in a complaint despite the superfluous language. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116074) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 10:17 AM Author: emerald hissy fit Totally dude it’s a pure coincidence you rabidly defend everything tangentially related to Trump ;-) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116143) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 10:20 AM Author: Indecent Burgundy Sandwich Kitty this complaint has little merit and is poorly drafted. its embarassing potus trump would litigate something like this in the first place.
nevertheless, youre retarded and although this case is shit youve managed to develop tds from an angle that shows just how stupid you are. |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 4:48 PM Author: Light supple sanctuary Do you think a lawyer with a 110+ IQ would write this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116935) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 5:00 PM Author: Indecent Burgundy Sandwich Kitty ive written dumber things when ive been paid to advocate a losing issue for a meglomaniac (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116959) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 10:25 AM Author: Exhilarant indian lodge nowag did you not read the lawyer’s tweet? you know you don’t have to defend every retarded thing Trump and he’s people do, right? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116158) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 10:26 AM Author: Indecent Burgundy Sandwich Kitty poast the tweet and the document this is from (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116161) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 10:20 AM Author: Beady-eyed Parlor "However..." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116145) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 10:26 AM Author: bossy multi-billionaire ladyboy Every few months i give a ‘gunneratt’ post another try and immediately regret it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116162) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 10:31 AM Author: Indecent Burgundy Sandwich Kitty every time i see one of your poasts its skme mpc catty adhom without an argument on why you disagree/are maf (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116170) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 11:05 AM Author: Beady-eyed Parlor It's like watching TDNW defend Ukraine. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116239) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 1:04 PM Author: Exhilarant indian lodge nowag (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116444) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 1:00 PM Author: Geriatric stage This is a dumb Tweet and a dumb thread.
They're trying to show that the libel was spread not just among the WSJ subscribers, but to hundreds of millions of people. |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 1:05 PM Author: Exhilarant indian lodge nowag cr! NOT EXCLUSIVE! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116446) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 4:49 PM Author: Light supple sanctuary Cr. The Journal LIED by saying it was "exclusive"! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116939) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 1:23 PM Author: shimmering friendly grandma kitty cat Just take out "however" and it makes sense. It was exclusive and it was disseminated to hundreds of millions of people. Edit: here's the full complaint https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.693830/gov.uscourts.flsd.693830.1.0.pdf (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116467) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 1:44 PM Author: Exhilarant indian lodge nowag How old are you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116523) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 4:34 PM Author: Indecent Burgundy Sandwich Kitty crazy how all the actual lawyers here identified your tds for what it is (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116886) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2025 11:24 AM Author: shimmering friendly grandma kitty cat I'm 78 and interested in why you asked. ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49118655) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2025 11:26 AM Author: Exhilarant indian lodge nowag sit this one out boomer (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49118659) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2025 11:26 AM Author: shimmering friendly grandma kitty cat Explain (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49118662) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2025 11:33 AM Author: Exhilarant indian lodge nowag Just take out “explain” (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49118674) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 4:47 PM Author: Beady-eyed Parlor If you interpret "exclusive" to mean subscribers-only, then the fact that it was widely disseminated might reflect to intent to make it more broadly known. However I've always interpreted it to mean "only we have this info," which a media org often does with articles it runs paywall-free. They serve as advertising for the publication sometimes.
I also think a lot of stuff gets published paywall-free when it's just really important. Like when the NY times was reporting about Trump bombing Iran, I believe all of it was paywall-free. The WSJ would presumably do that if it had something exclusive and with that level of significance. They made a lot of shit paywall-free when Flynn went down in 2017. Their ukraineshit is sometimes paywall-free |
|
Date: July 21st, 2025 11:24 AM Author: shimmering friendly grandma kitty cat My understanding is that in journalism "exclusive" means that you're the only news outlet who has access to the information and the right to publish it. I don't know if they paywalled this or not. I have WSJ and NYT subscriptions, so everything just opens up automatically.
Exclusivity is possibly a piece of the argument establishing actual malice. If no other news sources carried the information it erases the possibility of an "everybody is saying it" defense and any potential reliance the fact checking by other entities. I just skimmed the complaint.
I am forced to admire Trump's pugilistic spirit. I had an alpha dog like that once. He never took shit from any other dog and was a great inspiration. |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 5:01 PM Author: Beady-eyed Parlor What's the point of this litigation if Trump thinks there's any chance the WSJ has something authentic? But also why would WSJ make this up? One or the other side is retarded (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49116964) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2025 11:30 AM Author: Exhilarant indian lodge nowag It doesn’t matter if it’s authentic (i.e., whether Trump actually wrote it). What matters is that it purports to be from Trump and was included in a binder Maxwell prepared for Epstein which was then seized by the FBI when they executed the search warrant at Epstein’s property. That fact alone makes it newsworthy, and that’s all WSJ ever said it was. They never said “we hereby declare that Donald Trump authored this letter.” We all know he did, but the point is that part doesn’t even have to be true for WSJ to prevail in this lawsuit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49118669) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2025 11:42 AM Author: Indecent Burgundy Sandwich Kitty when you sue people a lot people are more careful when dealing with you. also some people are more likely to believe something is untrue if you sue over it even if you wind up losing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49118704) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2025 11:49 AM Author: Beady-eyed Parlor What were you trying to say? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2#49118724) |