The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Crappy Film CGI is worse than any “AI slop”
| Maroon indian lodge turdskin | 07/01/25 |
| floppy location weed whacker | 07/01/25 |
| Maroon indian lodge turdskin | 07/01/25 |
| high-end pozpig | 07/01/25 |
| Maroon indian lodge turdskin | 07/01/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 1st, 2025 8:13 AM Author: Maroon indian lodge turdskin (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2#49062617) |
Date: July 1st, 2025 8:37 AM Author: floppy location weed whacker trying to watch something from early 2000s with bad CGI is ruinous. This is why practical effects are necessary. While the FX from 80s monster movies have definitely aged they are at least still watchable and appreciable for the craft that went into them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2#49062648) |
 |
Date: July 1st, 2025 11:28 AM Author: Maroon indian lodge turdskin Even Star Wars prequels looked kind of dodgy in some spots. Good CGI isn’t even that expensive. Westerners just suck at making things efficiently. District 9 looked impressive iirc and it had a lowish budget iirc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2#49063141) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2025 8:44 AM Author: high-end pozpig James Bond surfing in die another day (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2#49062660) |
|
Date: July 1st, 2025 11:24 AM Author: Maroon indian lodge turdskin Not even as bad as you’d think (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2#49063133) |