Here is an example of how the process occurs in the public realm. The question I have is if this is an intentional process or a natural race to the bottom effect when it comes to lowest common denominator behavior.

Sports Illustrated was once part of TimeWarner, until it was spun off into a publishing company called Time. Time eventually got bought by another company called Meredith. Meredith turned around and sold the Sports Illustrated title to a company called Authentic Brands Group which buys a bunch of consumer brands and re-brands/markets them.

Authentic Brands Group was founded by Jamie Salter, a Canadian Jewish businessman. Outside of him, shareholders in the company are Leonard Green & Partners which is owned by Leonard Green who is a American Jew from Philadelphia, Lion Capital which is run by Ed Forst, a American Jewish banker who was once part of Goldman Sachs and Blackrock which is run by Larry Fink, another American Jew who is very liberal.

Fink is known to use his company's position in finance as a major shareholder in many companies in the world due to their control of iShares which mass markets passive investing vehicles worldwide to investors to agitate boards for liberal causes). Regular investors do not vote in company affairs due to their ownership of a passive index and are less informed, while the people running these passive investment vehicles wield enormously disproportionate power to influence companies to adopt and perpetuate particular ideologies.

If you look at these data-points, one could infer that it is possible that there is an effort to homogenize and direct all forms of media and corporations to adopt specific topics and viewpoints. It is no coincidence that Sports Illustrated has recently started putting Trans models in their famous Swimsuit issue - which is a major popular culture institution.

One might also be able to infer that the monetary losses incurred by the drop in business that occurs when these companies push these highly unpopular viewpoints onto people are in fact also subsidized by segments of high finance with a deeper and more sinister agenda. Or it is simply evidence of race to the bottom behavior inherent to Globalism.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4591628&forum_id=2#40659133)

globohomo dogma increases big business profits-->so the media is forced by its advertisers to push globohomo dogma...a business is starting to fail, and so it needs media publicity in order to survive...management knows that the media reward businesses with free publicity if they do and say things that are in accord with globohomo dogma...so the management of that failing enterprises does and says things that are in accord with globohomo dogma...and the media in turn rewards them with free publicity...

this dynamic is playing out all over america...in varying ways.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4591628&forum_id=2#40659220)

--

TLDR = ETFs lead to globohomo?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4591628&forum_id=2#40771598)

This, so much this *snaps fingers*

If anything it shines a UV light on a nefarious practice of "loss leaders" that high financiers can incur to subsidize sinister schemes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4591628&forum_id=2#41195200)