how could someone be stupid enough to want a supercar but rich enough to afford
| Marvelous Lay | 07/04/25 | | Hyperactive cerise meetinghouse | 07/04/25 | | dashing stag film mother | 07/04/25 | | Hyperactive cerise meetinghouse | 07/04/25 | | dashing stag film mother | 07/04/25 | | Hyperactive cerise meetinghouse | 07/04/25 | | dashing stag film mother | 07/04/25 | | Hyperactive cerise meetinghouse | 07/04/25 | | thirsty charismatic potus | 07/04/25 | | Hyperactive cerise meetinghouse | 07/04/25 | | painfully honest lavender box office | 07/04/25 | | supple yapping macaca | 07/04/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 2:10 PM Author: Hyperactive cerise meetinghouse
P1, F1, F40, F50, 288 GTO, Enzo 918, CGT, the very limited lambos, koenigzegg, Murray etc.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745997&forum_id=2#49071997) |
Date: July 4th, 2025 10:15 AM Author: thirsty charismatic potus
not worth buying a supercar even if you're "rich" enough to afford one because, except for rare collectibles, they depreciate and are expensive as fuck to own and maintain. moreover, buying a supercar is usually a sign of poor money management and a good indicator you'll go broke eventually.
in my industry i know tons of people who could technically afford multiple supercars, but they instead buy appreciating assets like houses and other investments. mid-to-high-end Mercedes or Porsche is about as far as they go, car-wise.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745997&forum_id=2#49071557) |
|
|