The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Lawyers who disregard order of addressees in email
| jet cerebral shrine | 11/29/18 |
| Rebellious Gunner Area | 07/08/25 |
| arousing alcoholic indirect expression | 07/08/25 |
| trip burgundy black woman stag film | 07/08/25 |
| arousing alcoholic indirect expression | 07/08/25 |
| Pungent puce stead | 07/08/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 29th, 2018 4:58 PM Author: jet cerebral shrine (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4145369&forum_id=2#37322384) |
Date: July 8th, 2025 10:49 PM Author: Rebellious Gunner Area (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4145369&forum_id=2#49084769) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2025 10:52 PM Author: arousing alcoholic indirect expression i’ve seen *former* lawyers who did this, but never any that were able to remain barred. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4145369&forum_id=2#49084782) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2025 10:56 PM Author: trip burgundy black woman stag film You mean alphabetical (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4145369&forum_id=2#49084803) |
 |
Date: July 8th, 2025 10:57 PM Author: arousing alcoholic indirect expression ljl. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4145369&forum_id=2#49084806) |
|
Date: July 8th, 2025 11:02 PM Author: Pungent puce stead i was adjacent to a situation where a low level associate was sending out an email to the client, two partners, and two other non-partners.
the associate got reamed, in a screaming way, by the senior partner for not listing the client first in the "to" line, then the partners by seniority in the "to" line, and then the non-partners by seniority in the "cc" line. |