Date: October 7th, 2026 10:21 AM Author: exciting lemon bawdyhouse legend
"I would not sign it as is," said chatGPT about the 9th completely innocuous and unremarkable settlement instrument in a row, making the Eager Beaver female CLS grad who used to perform this task look chill by comparison.
Date: October 7th, 2026 10:28 AM Author: Laughsome old irish cottage
It's a pretty big buzzkill about authorities you cite in your brief, always pointing out ways in which it's distinguishable. Usually I'm like "no shit, it's not exactly on point, but still provides a good arguing point in my brief."
This quibble aside, the ChatGPT pay version is amazing for federal litigation stuff. I just ignore the buzzkill stuff if I satisfy myself the case is still worth citing.
Date: October 7th, 2026 10:41 AM Author: exciting lemon bawdyhouse legend
Yeah it's gotten fantastic. It's still a shitty writer, oddly enough (I'll only use it to write stuff I truly dgaf about), but the research capability has basically replaced the need for WL search terms. I openly said the opposite was true a year ago.