Trump believes your heart is a battery and the more you work it out the sooner you’ll drop dead, so golf for limited exercise without sweating and eat McDonald’s and shit

Imo the battery view is correct which is why most high performing athletes drop dead very young , sustained exercise is unhealthy as fuck

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5347547&forum_id=2#46367958)

but you already knew that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5347547&forum_id=2#46368143)

working out to stay in shape and feel good is great. more people should do it. but LMAO at grown men 'programming' their routines and gazing at themselves in the mirror day after day like some retarded teenager. or miserably force feeding 180 grams of protein every day for GAINTHS. it all flows from insecurity and obsessive behavior. i don't think i have a ever met an impressively jacked gym rat dude who was truly socially capable and was fun to be around. it's a stunted mentality.

trump lifestyle, on the other hand, will kill most people prematurely and was 2X as lethal prior to statins.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5347547&forum_id=2#46368091)

"vain like a woman" no

"lack engagement with society" unfortunately no

"aspie" yes

"gymcel" no

"mudvayne" idk what is but I talk all the time at the gym

At the end of the day, it's fun, feels great, and it's a tremendous waste not to maximize your performance. You don't have to do the 2h thing though, you can get by with one and a quarter including cardio.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5347547&forum_id=2#46368115)

I can't speak for why other people workout, but the reason I workout and tell others to is because it makes you feel 180 and you can do so much more stuff when you're in shape. I'm sure there are plenty who do it as a coping mechanism to avoid fixing their personal problems, but that's pretty tangential to the OP.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5347547&forum_id=2#46368321)

Not a ton of physical fights at my law firm these days and I am in fine shape for all my physical hobbies. I do the minimum to make sure I can keep up with my lifestyle.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5347547&forum_id=2#46368410)

Sure thing bro dude you are definitely not like that, ha ha, for sure, people without deeply insecure masculinity or other mental issues routinely brag about screaming slurs and physically intimidating people who annoy them, 180!

And your posting is known for being so funny and self-aware, definitely shows the haters that you're a fun-loving guy not some dour spectrum-afflicted gym rat!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5347547&forum_id=2#46368450)

Your poasting is that of a bitter, resentful, insecure asian bugboy (hapa?), being a dour gym rat would be an improvement for you

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5347547&forum_id=2#46368614)

No offense because you are an XO brother but you really seek validation on XO and that is also in line with the type of approval seeking from strangers that working out for huge mass and strength speaks to. If you can't sustain your physique with a 4-6 hours a week of total activity then it's because that's not really you but you need the world to see something else.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5347547&forum_id=2#46368676)

"SURE THING BRO HAHA YOU SOUND UNHINGED AND PATHETIC AND MAYBE EVEN AUTISTIC YOU CLEARLY HAVE SEVERE MENTAL ISSUES AND ARE AN INCREDIBLY WEIRD OBSESSED FREAK, LOOKS LIKE I WON ANOTHER ONLINE EXCHANGE LOL!"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5347547&forum_id=2#46370775)

I had my own phase with this when I was 19-21 and can't imagine an adult with a real life being engrossed in body building culture.

And yes that's all it is. Any arguments as to the value of performance or whatever are all thin rationale for the sheer vanity of wanting to see a ripped monsters staring back at you. Having 21" pythons is not useful in life except for the guy to feel a small rush when he poses down in the bathroom.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5347547&forum_id=2#46368233)

lol. How fat are you?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5347547&forum_id=2#46368347)

That being said you sound MAF for some reason. Meatheads exist everywhere, it's just a childish urge to want to look scary to other dudes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5347547&forum_id=2#46368385)

Gym is good, but sport is best. They're both "leisure" but require time and effort. If you can't "sport" then you gym, and therefore, you're a loser. Simple as

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5347547&forum_id=2#46368566)

That doesn't mean what you think it means. Studying entire populations yields different conclusions than measuring individuals' physiological processes.

What that data actually indicates is that the hunter/gatherers referenced have significantly higher metabolic efficiency than populations in developed countries. (Incidentally, this is exactly what you would expect to see in a group of high activity people who are operating on limited calories.)

Other unmentioned (but very salient) factors:

- intensity of activity. The study measures minutes of activity per day. Putting aside the fact that it doesn't say how that is measured (self-reported? What counts as activity?), this does not factor for intensity of activity. 30 minutes of walking and 30 minutes of running are not calorically equivalent, although they might both be categorized as "30 active minutes." I suspect that the intensity of the hunter-gatherers' activity is lower than the study is trying to imply.

- caloric intake. Caloric intake conditions your metabolism over the course of time, and if these hunter-gatherers have been operating on limited calories since birth, they probably have extraordinarily efficient metabolism. This means that they are able to engage in much more activity than westerners on the same caloric intake.

- stress levels. Without adequately comparing stress levels in the aggregate populations, it's impossible to adequately attribute caloric expenditure exclusively to activity. In comparing Western populations, this doesn't matter very much because stress levels across the modern world are very comparable. However, members of a primitive hunter-gatherer society likely have extremely different endocrine systems than those in developed countries. First, their cortisol levels are probably much lower. Second, they don't experience endocrine disruption from microplastics, PFOAs, etc. Without adequately comparing these things, it's very imprecise to attribute caloric expenditure solely to activity. (e.g. professional chess players in a high profile tournament have been measured to burn up to 6,000 calories a day despite minimal physical activity; stress and focused thinking both can expend significant energy.)

It's a very interesting study in comparing collectives, but trying to extrapolate it to say that increased activity does not result in increased caloric expenditure on an individual level is pretty fucking stupid.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5347547&forum_id=2#46380116)