https://x.com/ericldaugh/status/1846674365901164721

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205265)

https://x.com/breaking911/status/1846675741871649272

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205270)

Bret: Why haven't you done anything for 3.5 years while you were in power?

KWAN: Trump has been running for office!

Bret: You HOLD the office

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205297)

https://x.com/ericldaugh/status/1846678491296944484

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205298)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205320)

CR these stupid conturds just don’t recognize JOY when they see it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205494)

kamala, quaffing merlot directly from a botabox bag: "haha yeah!"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205299)

i thought they'd at least be able to get her to memorize rubio-esqe canned answers.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205313)

https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1846678754464354470

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205306)

i wasn't impressed with how baier began. he didn't make her answer the question. he begged it when she diverted and then he stated a number and again let her off the hook

it got better the next 5 minutes.

but you still cannot let the interviewee divert with 'i'll follow the law' when you are asking for her personal opinion. 'understanding that you will follow the law, what is your personal opinion about..?' 'of course you will follow the law, no one would expect any less (even though you haven't been), but the american public is going to have to accept that your personal opinion hasn't changed unless you provide some clarification. otherwise, let's move on.'

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205323)

https://x.com/ericldaugh/status/1846679966617940426

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205324)

Unpopular hot take: the clip where she literally gets pissed and starts shrilly screaming is bad because that’s a very bad look and nobody of either gender actually likes it when women act like that and it plays directly into low key concerns that many people who might otherwise vote Dem have about electing a woman to be POTUS. That could move the needle somewhat.

But the rest of these “one devastating she’s so dun here now” clips are kind of meh. They’re not gonna help her, but idk how much they will hurt her, either. Typical 5/10 performance for Kamala IMO, black women and Tommy will say she slayed, hardcore right wing partisans will say this is worse than the Biden debate, and mostly all of the normies just won’t give a fuck or won’t even know those clips exist in the first place.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205342)

In’shallah and I wish you the best of luck my brother, bury this dumb evil brown bitch in the center of the Earth. I’m just sharing my 100% honest hot takes with my fellow based bros.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205354)

Ok now I’m hard, this one is pretty goddamn bad.

Lmao Tommy where you at lil buddy? Is this a high IQ #BadBitchProsecutor response IYO?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205370)

Brother I literally defended Kween a little bit upthread but LJL if you truly think she is “coherent” and “doesn’t ramble.”

In before more nonsresponsive “b-b-but Trump!” nuclear shitlib cope. (Oh wow Trump says dumb shit and rambles?! Holy shit wow that changes everything and it totally means Kamala can’t also do that as well, this is how politics works it’s always an “either/or” situation trust me I know these things.)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205407)

LOL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205491)

https://x.com/electionwiz/status/1846690840598794286

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205480)

https://x.com/GrahamAllen_1/status/1846690729264861296

libs is that a good sign?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205487)

Multiply Harris by tens of millions. I am a little worried. Maybe a bit more than I was this morning.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205544)

We could have laughed at this 10 years ago, but just watching young women today plus all the institutional leaders, you realize how much more fragile the progressives are and their inability to cope when not in power. How they will lash out is to be seen but they will lash out in some form.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205582)

You’re dumb. Nothing will compare to the mental health break down of cons after Donald lost so badly in 2020

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205775)

This is the larger tragedy of Kamala Harris. She embodies the insidious erosion of what was once demanded of statesmen and leaders—the expectation of coherence, conviction, and competence. Instead, we are left with a political class dominated by figures like her, scheming opportunists who thrive in the murky waters of ambiguity but crumble when asked to articulate a clear stance. It is no wonder that clarity is her nemesis; it exposes her lack of principle, her inability to navigate complex issues without reverting to platitudes. She is fraudulent not merely in the sense of being dishonest, but because her entire political persona is a sham, an edifice constructed out of ambition but devoid of foundation.

In Harris, we witness the culmination of a political age where presentation supersedes substance. She does not fail because she is underqualified—though that is also true—but because she is an artifact of a system that rewards those who can feign conviction without ever having to prove it. Her ambition is boundless, yet it is never tethered to an actual ideology or set of beliefs. It is not that she lacks the capacity to handle pressure in and of itself; rather, it is that the pressure demands a sincerity and depth she simply does not possess.

She symbolizes a cynical transition in leadership where the true statesman has been supplanted by the political operator—insipid in intellect, scheming in practice, and fraudulent in character. She flounders in interviews, not because of tough questioning, but because the very nature of being asked to clarify her thoughts unravels the carefully woven deceit that is her public persona. And therein lies the fundamental problem: when you are built entirely on artifice, the only response to genuine scrutiny is collapse.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5612730&forum_id=2#48205778)