20% Yamnaya (from the Steppe, not BIRDSHITland)

The other 20% was some other sand nigga shit.

Conclusion: ZERO percent relationship to northern Euro birdshits who are totally neolithic METHHEADS mixed with diff subset of yamnaya's who were probably LOSERS

The DNA of ancient Greeks was a complex mix of different ancestral components, reflecting the region's long history of migration and admixture. According to a 2017 study published in the journal Science, the majority of ancient Greek DNA came from two main sources:

Anatolian farmers: These were the first Neolithic farmers who arrived in Greece from Anatolia (modern-day Turkey) around 7,000 years ago. They brought with them agriculture and new technologies, and their DNA is thought to make up about 60% of the ancestry of ancient Greeks.

Yamnaya pastoralists: These were a Bronze Age people who migrated from the Eurasian steppe into Europe around 5,000 years ago. They brought with them horses and wheeled vehicles, and their DNA is thought to make up about 20% of the ancestry of ancient Greeks.

In addition to these two main sources, ancient Greek DNA also included smaller amounts of DNA from other populations, such as Minoans and Mycenaeans. The Minoans were a Bronze Age civilization that flourished on Crete from around 2700 to 1450 BCE. The Mycenaeans were a Bronze Age civilization that ruled mainland Greece from around 1600 to 1100 BCE.

The DNA of ancient Greeks shows that they were a diverse population with a rich genetic heritage. Their DNA reflects the region's long history of interaction with other cultures, and it provides valuable insights into the origins and development of Greek civilization.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5452117&forum_id=2#47111773)

Yes, there is some evidence to suggest that Greeks did adopt Buddhism and bring it back to Greece. This is most evident in the Greco-Buddhist art that was produced in the Gandhara region of present-day Afghanistan and Pakistan during the 1st and 2nd centuries CE. This art shows a fusion of Greek and Buddhist styles, and it is likely that it was produced by Greek artists who had converted to Buddhism.

There is also evidence that Greek merchants and scholars traveled to India during the Hellenistic period (323-146 BCE), and that they may have encountered Buddhism during their travels. For example, the Greek historian Megasthenes (c. 350-290 BCE) wrote extensively about India in his book Indica, and he mentioned the existence of "gymnosophists" or "naked philosophers" in the country. These gymnosophists were likely Buddhist ascetics, and Megasthenes' description of them suggests that he had some understanding of Buddhism.

It is therefore possible that some Greeks converted to Buddhism during the Hellenistic period, or that they were at least influenced by Buddhist ideas. This could have led to the spread of Buddhism to Greece, and to the production of Greco-Buddhist art. However, there is no definitive evidence to prove that Greeks ever practiced Buddhism on a large scale in Greece itself.

Nevertheless, the existence of Greco-Buddhist art and the possibility that some Greeks converted to Buddhism during the Hellenistic period are a testament to the cultural exchange that took place between Greece and India in the ancient world. This exchange of ideas and cultures helped to shape the development of both civilizations.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5452117&forum_id=2#47111774)

"Of modern populations surveyed in the study, Norwegians were found to have the largest amount of WSH ancestry, which among them exceeded 50%."

I suppose you think norweigians are at least 50% non white then?

also by this analysis all of europe has no birdshit DNA. Europe is literally all anatolian farmer and steppe dNA with some other shit mixed in. I'm literally like 50% anatolian farmer DNA, 50% steppe, what does that make me?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5452117&forum_id=2#47111775)

Hence why it's called Danish, Danube River etc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5452117&forum_id=2#47111780)

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/af/Wall_painting_of_cult_procession_from_Knossos_%28Corridor_of_Procession%29_-_Heraklion_AM_-_01.jpg/2560px-Wall_painting_of_cult_procession_from_Knossos_%28Corridor_of_Procession%29_-_Heraklion_AM_-_01.jpg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5452117&forum_id=2#47111826)

https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5451356&mc=5&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5452117&forum_id=2#47111877)

they also were greatly influenced by indian astronomy, and other science shit nigga

its actually LAUGHABLE northern birdshits wld pretend to be greek culturally, its just a JOKE!! i lol in ur BIRDSHIT ugly face!! u fell for a flying JEW GOD and that aint greek, birdshit, u aint grecian

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5452117&forum_id=2#47111939)

https://artfilemagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Greek-Artwork.jpg

https://www.alamy.com/fayum-portraits-ancient-greek-funeral-paintings-from-3rd-century-bc-to-3rd-century-ad-egypt-naturalistic-mummy-paintings-image335116222.html

https://sites.tufts.edu/digmilconference/about/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5452117&forum_id=2#47114943)

The skin tone of ancient Greeks likely varied depending on their social status and lifestyle. Men, who spent more time outdoors working or engaged in physical activities, were likely to have tanned skin. Women, who spent more time indoors, were likely to have paler skin. This is reflected in ancient Greek art, which often depicts men with darker skin than women.

The ancient Greeks also had a variety of terms for different skin tones. The most common term for light skin was leucochroia (λευκόχροια), which means "white-skinned." The most common term for dark skin was melanochroia (μελαγχροία), which means "black-skinned." There were also a number of terms for intermediate skin tones, such as xanthochroia (ξανθόχροια), which means "yellow-skinned," and erythraochroia (ερυθρόχροια), which means "red-skinned."

The ancient Greeks did not have the same concept of race as we do today. They did not believe that people were inherently different based on their skin color. However, they did associate darker skin with certain stereotypes, such as strength and virility. For example, the Spartan warrior class was known for its dark skin, which was seen as a sign of their toughness and discipline.

Ultimately, the skin tone of ancient Greeks was likely as diverse as the population itself.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5452117&forum_id=2#47115880)

it birdshitified the population to the point they are mostly just birdshit in the western part of that furked up country

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5452117&forum_id=2#47116000)

Europe is just steppe + anatolian + european farmer or whatever

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5452117&forum_id=2#47116002)