Going to be cr.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4998936&forum_id=2#43716001)

--19th cent russian peasant, probably

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4998936&forum_id=2#43716035)

Potatoes are high in fiber and nearly nutritionally complete and very high on the satiety index. It has been observed that if you eat only potatoes, you will wind up eating very few calories and feeling great, quickly shedding pounds while maintaining health. My plan is to add some protein & the nutrients potatoes do not possess.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4998936&forum_id=2#43716065)

Just don't fry in a keg of oil and you'll be a machine

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4998936&forum_id=2#43716232)

https://youtu.be/lTB0Myga0J4

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4998936&forum_id=2#43718184)

Scientific refs

Potatoes contain a proteinase inhibitor (aka: PI2) that reduces appetite.

This protein appears to enhance the release of cholecystokinin (CCK), a hormone that promotes feelings of satiety.

See the article:

Health-beneficial properties of potato and compounds of interest

J Sci Food Agric. 2016 Dec;96(15):4850-4860. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7848. Epub 2016 Jul 7.

Greater satiety response with resistant starch and corn bran in human subjects

Nutr Res. 2009 Feb;29(2):100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2009.01.004.

Some studies suggest high-fiber foods are more satiating than foods with little or no fiber. However, we hypothesized that certain types of dietary fiber may enhance satiety more than others. Healthy men and women (N = 20) participated in this acute, randomized double-blind, crossover study comparing the effects of 4 fibers and a low-fiber (LF) treatment on satiety. On 5 separate visits, fasting subjects consumed either a LF muffin (1.6 g fiber) or 1 of 4 high-fiber muffins (8.0-9.6 g fiber) for breakfast. The subjects used 4 questions on 100 mm visual analogue scales to rate satiety at baseline and at regular intervals for 180 minutes after muffin consumption. Responses were analyzed as area under the curve and significant differences from baseline. Satiety differed among treatments. Resistant starch and corn bran had the most impact on satiety, whereas polydextrose had little effect and behaved like the LF treatment. Results from this study indicate that not all fibers influence satiety equally.

Insulin-sensitizing effects of dietary resistant starch and effects on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue metabolism

Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Sep;82(3):559-67. doi: 10.1093/ajcn.82.3.559.

Background: Resistant starch may modulate insulin sensitivity, although the precise mechanism of this action is unknown.

Objective: We studied the effects of resistant starch on insulin sensitivity and tissue metabolism.

Design: We used a 4-wk supplementation period with 30 g resistant starch/d, compared with placebo, in 10 healthy subjects and assessed the results by using arteriovenous difference methods.

Results: When assessed by euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp, insulin sensitivity was higher after resistant starch supplementation than after placebo treatment (9.7 and 8.5 x 10(-2) mg glucose x kg(-1) x min(-1) x (mU insulin/L)(-1), respectively; P = 0.03); insulin sensitivity during the meal tolerance test (MTT) was 33% higher (P = 0.05). Forearm muscle glucose clearance during the MTT was also higher after resistant starch supplementation (P = 0.03) despite lower insulin concentrations (P = 0.02); glucose clearance adjusted for insulin was 44% higher. Subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA; P = 0.02) and glycerol (P = 0.05) release were lower with resistant starch supplementation, although systemic NEFA concentrations were not significantly altered. Short-chain fatty acid concentrations (acetate and propionate) were higher during the MTT (P = 0.05 and 0.01, respectively), as was acetate uptake by adipose tissue (P = 0.03). Fasting plasma ghrelin concentrations were higher with resistant starch supplementation (2769 compared with 2062 pg/mL; P = 0.03), although postprandial suppression (40-44%) did not differ significantly. Measurements of gene expression in adipose tissue and muscle were uninformative, which suggests effects at a metabolic level. The resistant starch supplement was well tolerated.

Conclusion: These results suggest that dietary supplementation with resistant starch has the potential to improve insulin sensitivity. Further studies in insulin-resistant persons are needed.

Resistant starch lowers postprandial glucose and leptin in overweight adults consuming a moderate-to-high-fat diet: a randomized-controlled trial

Nutr J. 2017; 16: 14.

Published online 2017 Feb 21. doi: 10.1186/s12937-017-0235-8

Background: High-amylose maize resistant starch type 2 (HAM-RS2) stimulates gut-derived satiety peptides and reduces adiposity in animals. Human studies have not supported these findings despite improvements in glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity after HAM-RS2 intake which can lower adiposity-related disease risk. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of HAM-RS2 consumption on blood glucose homeostasis in overweight, healthy adults. We also examined changes in biomarkers of satiety (glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1], peptide YY [PYY], and leptin) and body composition determined by anthropometrics and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, dietary intake, and subjective satiety measured by a visual analogue scale following HAM-RS2 consumption.

Methods: Using a randomized-controlled, parallel-arm, double-blind design, 18 overweight, healthy adults consumed either muffins enriched with 30 g HAM-RS2 (n = 11) or 0 g HAM-RS2 (control; n = 7) daily for 6 weeks. The HAM-RS2 and control muffins were similar in total calories and available carbohydrate.

Results: At baseline, total PYY concentrations were significantly higher 120 min following the consumption of study muffins in the HAM-RS2 group than control group (P = 0.043). Within the HAM-RS2 group, the area under the curve (AUC) glucose (P = 0.028), AUC leptin (P = 0.022), and postprandial 120-min leptin (P = 0.028) decreased independent of changes in body composition or overall energy intake at the end of 6 weeks. Fasting total PYY increased (P = 0.033) in the HAM-RS2 group, but changes in insulin or total GLP-1 were not observed. Mean overall change in subjective satiety score did not correlate with mean AUC biomarker changes suggesting the satiety peptides did not elicit a satiation response or change in overall total caloric intake. The metabolic response from HAM-RS2 occurred despite the habitual intake of a moderate-to-high-fat diet (mean range 34.5% to 39.4% of total calories).

Conclusion: Consuming 30 g HAM-RS2 daily for 6 weeks can improve glucose homeostasis, lower leptin concentrations, and increase fasting PYY in healthy overweight adults without impacting body composition and may aid in the prevention of chronic disease. However, between-group differences in biomarkers were not observed and future research is warranted before specific recommendations can be made.

Resistant starch in food: a review

J Sci Food Agric. 2015 Aug 15;95(10):1968-78. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6966. Epub 2014 Nov 21.

The nutritional property of starch is related to its rate and extent of digestion and absorption in the small intestine. For nutritional purposes, starch is classified as rapidly available, slowly available and resistant starch (RS). The exact underlying mechanism of relative resistance of starch granules is complicated because those factors are often interconnected. The content of RS in food is highly influenced by food preparation manner and processing techniques. Physical or chemical treatments also alter the level of RS in a food. Commercial preparations of RS are now available and can be added to foods as an ingredient for lowering the calorific value and improving textural and organoleptic characteristics along with increasing the amount of dietary fiber. RS has assumed great importance owing to its unique functional properties and health benefits. The beneficial effects of RS include glycemic control and control of fasting plasma triglyceride and cholesterol levels and absorption of minerals. This review attempts to analyze the information published, especially in the recent past, on classification, structure, properties, applications and health benefits of RS.

The impact of starchy food structure on postprandial glycemic response and appetite: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized crossover trials

Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Aug 2;114(2):472-487. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab098.

Background: Starchy foods can have a profound effect on metabolism. The structural properties of starchy foods can affect their digestibility and postprandial metabolic responses, which in the long term may be associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes and obesity.

Objectives: This systematic review sought to evaluate the clinical evidence regarding the impact of the microstructures within starchy foods on postprandial glucose and insulin responses alongside appetite regulation.

Methods: A systematic search was performed in the PUBMED, Ovid Medicine, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases for data published up to 18 January 2021. Data were extracted by 3 independent reviewers from randomized crossover trials (RCTs) that investigated the effect of microstructural factors on postprandial glucose, insulin, appetite-regulating hormone responses, and subjective satiety scores in healthy participants.

Results: We identified 745 potential articles, and 25 RCTs (n = 369 participants) met our inclusion criteria: 6 evaluated the amylose-to-amylopectin ratio, 6 evaluated the degree of starch gelatinization, 2 evaluated the degree of starch retrogradation, 1 studied starch-protein interactions, and 12 investigated cell and tissue structures. Meta-analyses showed that significant reductions in postprandial glucose and insulin levels was caused by starch with a high amylose content [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.64 mmol/L*min (95% CI: -0.83 to -0.46) and SMD = -0.81 pmol/L*min (95% CI: -1.07 to -0.55), respectively], less-gelatinized starch [SMD = -0.54 mmol/L*min (95% CI: -0.75 to -0.34) and SMD = -0.48 pmol/L*min (95% CI: -0.75 to -0.21), respectively], retrograded starch (for glucose incremental AUC; SMD = -0.46 pmol/L*min; 95% CI: -0.80 to -0.12), and intact and large particles [SMD = -0.43 mmol/L*min (95% CI: -0.58 to -0.28) and SMD = -0.63 pmol/L*min (95% CI: -0.86 to -0.40), respectively]. All analyses showed minor or moderate heterogeneity (I2 < 50%). Sufficient evidence was not found to suggest how these structural factors influence appetite.

Conclusions: The manipulation of microstructures in starchy food may be an effective way to improve postprandial glycemia and insulinemia in the healthy population

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4998936&forum_id=2#43732009)

Looks like the only people who have done this are a bunch of weird obese fucks who still look like shit?

Just do keto

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4998936&forum_id=2#43732030)

http://fatlossaccelerators.com/site/i-tried-the-potato-diet-for-3-days-heres-what-happened/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4998936&forum_id=2#43732042)

I need to lose about 40 lbs in short order while sparing muscle. Potato diet plus protein with molydbendum is the way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4998936&forum_id=2#43732064)

Anyway, looking at your other subthread, your normal diet is fine, so you're not a complete idiot. But this plan is still stupid. Ultra high carb with a splash of tien to lose fat while preserving muscle? Gl

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4998936&forum_id=2#43732198)

Says I, ‘My lovely darling I’m tired of single life

And if you’ve no objections I will make you my sweet wife’.

Says she, ‘I’ll ask my parents and tomorrow you shall know

If you’ll meet me in the garden where the praties grow’.

Her parents they consented and we’re blessed with children three

Two girls just like their mother and a boy the image of me.

We’ll train them up in decency the way they ought to go

And I’ll ne’er forget the garden where the praties grow.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4998936&forum_id=2#43732081)

But I put on some weight while wife was pregnant and over the Holidays.

So now I turn my eyes to the potato.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4998936&forum_id=2#43732112)

Also, if that's all you're really eating I'm not sure how you'd gain weight.

Have fun and good luck with the potatoes. I've heard it can be really helpful for people.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4998936&forum_id=2#43732135)