https://www.newsweek.com/audrey-hale-manifesto-release-raises-major-concerns-among-lgbtq-groups-1790938?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1680027396

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5314636&forum_id=2#46110509)

What is an assault pistol? Is this the new Shareblue script?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5314636&forum_id=2#46110528)

Imagine “News”week saying we shouldn’t release a right wing terrorist’s manifesto because it could drive hatred of right wingers. LJL!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5314636&forum_id=2#46110529)

“Don’t release the right winger’s manifesto because it will inspire people to join his cause”

“Don’t release the troon’s manifesto because it will inspire people to hate trannies”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5314636&forum_id=2#46112978)

But why is that? These ideas are not original to me, I'm like everyone else and my opinions are informed about what I read and what I see. Why is it that these trans people, who for all practical matters were not a part of civic life a half-decade ago, these things don't happen in isolation. Who decided that trans people - who appear to be sympathetic and sad people on their own - who decided that trans people are going to be a point of civic conflict. Who decided we're going to encourage trans stuff, who decided to encourage these people to act in the most disgusting way possible?

How can you interpret what is going on without concluding that someone, somewhere decided that this is going to be an issue that the powers that be will encourage normal people to fight over.

It's not just normal Americans, for some reason trans ideology now appears to be a major driver of American foreign policy, that corporations seem to push this stuff, and obviously the federal government is all in on pushing trans ideology.

I feel like it's not a bad idea to take a step back and pay attention to what is going on here. If you're angry, you're angry because someone wants you to be angry.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5314636&forum_id=2#46110547)

Bioleninism is a lot better framework for understanding this imo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5314636&forum_id=2#46111010)

yeah.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5314636&forum_id=2#46111828)

“220. Suppose you asked leftists to make a list of ALL the things that were wrong with society, and then suppose you instituted EVERY social change that they demanded. It is safe to say that within a couple of years the majority of leftists would find something new to complain about, some new social “evil” to correct because, once again, the leftist is motivated less by distress at society’s ills than by the need to satisfy his drive for power by imposing his solutions on society.

221. Because of the restrictions placed on their thoughts and behavior by their high level of socialization, many leftists of the over-socialized type cannot pursue power in the ways that other people do. For them the drive for power has only one morally acceptable outlet, and that is in the struggle to impose their morality on everyone.“

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5314636&forum_id=2#46110882)