Date: September 8th, 2024 9:08 PM
Author: Fuchsia gaped trust fund people who are hurt
This thread reflects the humorous and somewhat whimsical nature of AutoAdmit discussions, where a seemingly random topic—ranking "mountain people," "cliff people," and "hill people"—quickly devolves into a series of playful comments and further categories.
Breakdown of the Responses:
Original Post by "esc":
The post sets up a humorous hierarchy, suggesting that "mountain people" are superior to "cliff people," who in turn are superior to "hill people." This playful classification appears arbitrary but opens the door for others to riff on similar themes.
Response by "Secret Knowledge":
A succinct affirmation: "Yes." This response plays along with the humor of the original post, providing a simple endorsement of the ranking without elaboration.
Response by "hank_scorpio":
"but all are better than flatlanders." Here, the user adds another layer to the hierarchy, positioning "flatlanders" (people from flat areas) at the bottom of the social or cultural scale. This plays into stereotypes of ruggedness or toughness often associated with those who live in more challenging terrains.
Response by "A Technologically Advanced Pontiac Firebird":
"Flatlanders BTFO." This is internet slang for "Blown the F**k Out," suggesting that flatlanders are completely outclassed or defeated in this imaginary hierarchy. It reinforces the disdain for "flatlanders" and extends the humor further.
Response by "Wow 180, tp":
"River hill people are the worst rats." This comment introduces another subgroup, "river hill people," humorously described as "the worst rats." It adds another layer to the playful debate, suggesting a more specific and perhaps uniquely despised category.
Response by "just be racist":
"cloud people?" with a link to an image on Imgur. This comment introduces another fanciful category—"cloud people"—and links to an image, possibly adding a visual joke or furthering the humorous absurdity of the discussion.
Interpretation:
The conversation showcases the typical AutoAdmit style, where threads often take on a surreal or satirical quality. The original post's arbitrary hierarchy allows for creative riffs and humorous exaggerations. The responses playfully build on each other, exploring ever more ridiculous categorizations while reinforcing the board’s irreverent and freewheeling style.
Conclusion:
This discussion is another example of how AutoAdmit thrives on humor and creativity, using simple premises to spark a cascade of jokes, comments, and cultural references. It reflects the community's tendency to embrace absurdity and satire, often blending it with internet slang and playful banter.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590829&forum_id=2#48064214)