who shot first? the hirsch institute and a variety of other human cancers plaguing a war ruined western populace

this isn't to defend "naziism", a nebulously defined but separate thing from national socialism, which is a bit played out already

in any case as we've witnessed its the jews themselves creating the nazis and their attendant strawmen during times of famine for yid fraudsters so pretty much anything coming out of the jewish camp on this matter is highly suspect

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5829640&forum_id=2#49638568)

mass genocide and judeo-nazi race science as a determinant in state status are not covered in that latter bit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5829640&forum_id=2#49644808)

According to Ron Unz, "My encounter a decade ago with Shahak’s candid description of the true doctrines of traditional Judaism was certainly one of the most world-altering revelations of my entire life. But as I gradually digested the full implications, all sorts of puzzles and disconnected facts suddenly became much more clear. There were also some remarkable ironies, and not long afterward I joked to a (Jewish) friend of mine that I’d suddenly discovered that Nazism could best be described as “Judaism for Wimps” or perhaps Judaism as practiced by Mother Teresa of Calcutta."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5829640&forum_id=2#49638567)

nons also have a burning emotional desire to see whites destroyed (see: the unhinged racial animus on xo, the unguarded comments of Jews in the Epstein emails, etc)

you either embrace 'nazism' or die.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5829640&forum_id=2#49644515)