The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
 7 posters qualify.
You have 0 points. Copying this list does not send funds. Paste it on Disperse, then connect your wallet there. |
Computermos is this guy right that AI will break Bitcoin encryption soon
| Bateful Blue Forum Incel | 10/07/26 |
| Zombie-like appetizing chapel sandwich | 10/07/26 |
| Zombie-like appetizing chapel sandwich | 10/07/26 |
| Cyan splenetic regret stage | 10/07/26 |
| Amethyst bull headed reading party area | 10/07/26 |
| Bateful Blue Forum Incel | 10/07/26 |
| Amethyst bull headed reading party area | 10/07/26 |
| Sexy mediation theater stage | 10/07/26 |
| Amethyst bull headed reading party area | 10/07/26 |
| Bateful Blue Forum Incel | 10/08/26 |
| Mahogany laughsome theater pistol | 10/08/26 |
| Bateful Blue Forum Incel | 10/08/26 |
| aquamarine dashing indian lodge fortuitous meteor | 10/08/26 |
| Amethyst bull headed reading party area | 10/08/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 7th, 2026 2:33 PM Author: Bateful Blue Forum Incel https://x.com/drakefjustin/status/2107837081313505768?s=46
Today I call upon the blockchain industry to calmly begin planning for "bunker mode". My personal recommendation is to set in motion a controlled mass migration of assets to fresh addresses, i.e. addresses whose pubkeys remain hidden behind a hash.
Holders, starting with large and sophisticated ones, should consider moving the bulk of their funds to addresses that have never signed a transaction. And when they do sign one, they should also move remaining funds to a new address (possibly generated from the same seed phrase).
Don't rush. While I believe there is cause for action a rushed migration would do more harm than good. Don't panic either. Moving assets to protected addresses is a simple, preventative step which does not require new cryptography or new wallets.
IMO it is now reasonable to brace for the possibility that ECDSA breaks before qday, in the worst case in months not years. By "break" I mean fast private key recovery (e.g. in one week) on available hardware (e.g. a large GPU cluster).
Recent days have been humbling for human mathematical intuition. Long-held, unquestioned hypotheses have fallen. This includes the n log(n) bound for integer multiplication and the 3SUM conjecture. In hindsight, May's unexpected disproof of the ErdΕs unit distance conjecture was our warning shot.
Yesterday's OpenAI drop made it clear that mathematical superintelligence is upon us. They say there are weeks where decades happen. We are about to live through weeks where centuries of mathematical progress happen. Could our magic 64-byte ECDSA signatures be too good to be true? Was it just security through obscurity all this time?
Elliptic curves feel especially vulnerable to superintelligence. Curves carry rich structure, with room for fancy tricks like Schoof, Frobenius, pairings. (By contrast, hashes are designed to minimise algebraic structure.)
Separately, as Ewin Tang can attest, an efficient quantum algorithm sometimes foreshadows an efficient classical one. We should be open to the possibility of a classical counterpart to Shor that breaks elliptic curves and RSA at once.
Also noteworthy is the striking under-representation of cryptographic breakthroughs among the 722 mathematical results OpenAI published. I've witnessed first-hand the US government censoring academic quantum cryptanalysis results. Backroom interventionism is my base case.
I urge large, sophisticated actors to lead by example. Project11's "risq list" (bitcoin-risq-list.projecteleven[.]com) is a great tracker of exposed BTC pubkeys. Binance, Bitbank, Robinhood, Bitfinex, and Tether have an opportunity to harden their cold storage. Next month I'll address institutions in London in a live Q&A (forum.ethereuminstitutional[.]org/london-2026).
Again, please do not rush. Wallets holding under 50 BTC enjoy partial cover from "Satoshi's shield", i.e. his 20K exposed addresses that hold 50 BTC each. Load-bearing signers like oracles and L2 security councils should consider rotating ECDSA pubkeys with every signed message and/or multi-signing with a hash-based schemes like SPHINCS.
Exiting bunker mode safely will require post-AI cryptography. My inclination is to go all-in on hash-based cryptography and avoid structured mathematical assumptions entirely, whether from curves, lattices, or isogenies. A single battle-tested hash (e.g. from the SHA or BLAKE families) yields plausible post-AI security.
The Ethereum roadmap on strawmap[.]org fully embraces hash-based cryptography with end-to-end formal verification as a response to the quantum threat. Those timelines must now be revisited and accelerated in light of mathematical superintelligence. I'll be pushing for maximum defensive acceleration. |
 |
Date: October 7th, 2026 2:37 PM Author: Zombie-like appetizing chapel sandwich π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ |
Date: October 7th, 2026 2:37 PM Author: Zombie-like appetizing chapel sandwich π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ π¨ this is a WLMAS account π¨ |
|
Date: October 7th, 2026 2:50 PM Author: Cyan splenetic regret stage (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5910564&forum_id=2#50176644) |
|
Date: October 7th, 2026 3:02 PM Author: Amethyst bull headed reading party area It's possible. Wouldn't say secp256k1 is about to fail, but the reason it was more secure in the past was because the bar for new results in pure maths was so high, which it obviously is not anymore. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5910564&forum_id=2#50176665) |
|
Date: October 7th, 2026 3:03 PM Author: Bateful Blue Forum Incel well shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5910564&forum_id=2#50176666) |
|
Date: October 7th, 2026 3:06 PM Author: Amethyst bull headed reading party area Maybe a new type of calculus that works efficiently on the relevant elliptic curves? IDK, bar seems high because the structure of these curves has been studied intensely for a long time, but seems not that wild anymore consideriing all the new maths results open ai just released. Some of the stuff on that list is even in elliptical curves. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5910564&forum_id=2#50176672) |
|
Date: October 7th, 2026 3:10 PM Author: Sexy mediation theater stage lol damn son (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5910564&forum_id=2#50176678) |
|
Date: October 7th, 2026 3:14 PM Author: Amethyst bull headed reading party area (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5910564&forum_id=2#50176686) |
|
Date: October 8th, 2026 10:00 AM Author: Bateful Blue Forum Incel Top cryptography professor says we’re fucked
https://x.com/mattjay/status/2108129869301477776?s=46
Sell your bitcoins NOW |
|
Date: October 8th, 2026 10:14 AM Author: Mahogany laughsome theater pistol just sold everything (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5910564&forum_id=2#50178048) |
|
Date: October 8th, 2026 10:05 AM Author: Bateful Blue Forum Incel Coinbase head of cryptography says this guy is being hysterical
https://x.com/lindellyehuda/status/2107999859219587309?s=46 |
|
Date: October 8th, 2026 10:10 AM Author: aquamarine dashing indian lodge fortuitous meteor Yehuda seems trustworthy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5910564&forum_id=2#50178044) |
|
Date: October 8th, 2026 10:24 AM Author: Amethyst bull headed reading party area He isn't really being hysterical. Wouldn't be surprised if open ai's internal mathematical research has already crossed a threshold where substantial cryptanalytic progress is achievable, and they just haven't publicly released or demonstrated it yet. They have always admitted hardness assumptions were unproven and that algorithmic advances could make it unfeasible. When you have systems that can solve navier stokes, how far off can this really be? I think it's within the realm of possibility we could see we could see a serious AI discovered attack on a major public key scheme within the next year or two (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5910564&forum_id=2#50178058) |