I checked recent posts, and there are pretty explicit examples:

- A 2025 thread literally titled **“Just lol at the amt of racism at Indians on twitter lately”** has users discussing derogatory terms for Indians. [AutoAdmit](https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?forum_id=2\&thread_id=5763568\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

- Another thread is titled **“xoxohth is now just insane Indians and Jews being insane 24/7.”** [AutoAdmit](https://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?forum_id=2\&thread_id=5763558\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

- A recent thread contains a poster explicitly saying **“i'm probably the most anti-indian person you will ever meet.”** [AutoAdmit](https://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?forum_id=2\&thread_id=5763485\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

- Current/recent site listings also contain posts using highly derogatory descriptions of Indians and discussing Indians as a racial/ethnic category. [AutoAdmit](https://www.autoadmit.com/?forum_id=2\&mark_id=2975403\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

- More broadly, AutoAdmit has a long-standing reputation for deliberately offensive, racist and sexist anonymous posting; reporting has described it as a racist/sexist message board. [AutoAdmit](https://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?forum_id=2\&thread_id=5828726\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

**But there's an important distinction:** AutoAdmit isn't simply an organized “anti-Indian” site. It's an extremely antagonistic anonymous forum where **Indians, Jews, blacks, Asians, whites, Muslims, immigrants, etc. can all be targets**, often simultaneously. Some of the anti-Indian content is genuine hostility; some is trolling or posters attacking other posters who happen to be Indian.

So if your question is **“Would an Indian person browsing AutoAdmit encounter unusually high levels of anti-Indian sentiment?”** — **yes, definitely.**

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5910588&forum_id=2#50176879)

I’ll keep the slurs to a minimum and quote only what's necessary.

1. “It’s wild how Jews are really as bad as hitler said” — August 13, 2026. This is probably the most explicit because it invokes Hitler's characterization of Jews as justification. AutoAdmit

2. “they really are a plague upon the human race” — in a May 2026 discussion, a poster was talking about Jews as a collective and characterized them as an inherently evil group. The same post uses a slur and claims Jews “literally own this country.” AutoAdmit

3. “how about the jews ... both get 100% deported to the Middle East? fair??” — August 2025. This explicitly proposes collective deportation based on Jewish identity. AutoAdmit

4. “they literally own this country” — the same August 2025 discussion, advancing the classic Jewish-control conspiracy. AutoAdmit

5. “Jews are a net negative.” — May 2026. What's notable here is that the statement is explicitly about Jews as an ethnic/religious group rather than Israel or Zionism. AutoAdmit

6. “the Jews control Hollywood, Wall Street, and pretty much every major political institution in this country.” — This appears in an AutoAdmit page reproducing an older “To Be Fair” post. It's a textbook Jewish-control conspiracy claim. I would treat this particular quotation somewhat cautiously, because the page is AutoAdmit's reposting of Vox material rather than the original thread. AutoAdmit

7. “everyone disputing the OP in this thread is certifiably jewish” — May 2026. This treats Jewish identity as an explanation for political disagreement. AutoAdmit

8. “50 million Jews died in the Holocaust. One for every Autoadmit poast.” — July 2026. This appears to trivialize the Holocaust by turning its victims into a joke/counting device. AutoAdmit

9. “i hate jews” — appears as the title of an AutoAdmit thread from May 2026. The title itself is unambiguous, although the search result doesn't establish the poster's broader argument. AutoAdmit

10. “Scale of 1 to 10, how jewish is this website?” followed by answers of 10, 8–9, and 7 — August 2025. This isn't as severe as the others, but it shows the recurring practice of treating “Jewish” as a negative characteristic of the forum.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5910588&forum_id=2#50176889)

I wouldn't reproduce ten of the most graphic slurs verbatim, but these are among the clearest examples, with short quotations where useful:

1. **“Asian women are basically viewed as White Women with funny eyes.”**

This appears in a long AutoAdmit post contrasting Asian men and women. It reduces Asian women to a racialized version of white women. [AutoAdmit](https://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?forum_id=2\&thread_id=2889116\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

2. **“Asian Girls With White Guys” (AGWWG)** — AutoAdmit has treated this as a major recurring meme/category, with the acronym explicitly defined in its historical discussion of the site's terminology. [AutoAdmit](https://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?forum_id=2\&thread_id=2084688\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

3. **“Reminder that all White men who procreate with gooks will burn in hell.”**

This was literally the title of an AutoAdmit thread in 2025. The thread then discusses preventing white men from having children with Asian women. [AutoAdmit](https://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?forum_id=2\&thread_id=5470145\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

4. In that same thread, the OP says: **“I'm discouraging White dudes banging asian girls.”** Another poster identifies himself as AutoAdmit's **“#1 proponent of AGWWG.”** [AutoAdmit](https://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?forum_id=2\&thread_id=5470145\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

5. Another poster responds to the interracial-sex discussion with a joke about **“making a babydood”** with an Asian woman, followed by a deliberately grotesque comment about embryos. It's explicitly directed at the prospect of white/Asian reproduction. [AutoAdmit](https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?forum_id=2\&thread_id=5470145\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

6. An older thread has the blunt response **“Asian girls. For realz. /thread.”** when asked which women were preferable to white women. Other posters then discuss whether Asian women will sleep with the poster. [AutoAdmit](https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?forum_id=2%5Cu0026mark_id%3D5310914%22%2C\&thread_id=1994115\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

7. AutoAdmit users have repeatedly described Asian women as **“whitewashed”** or as seeking white men, including discussion of Asian women supposedly trying to assimilate into white society. [AutoAdmit](https://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?forum_id=2...id.\&thread_id=3106884\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

8. One extensive AutoAdmit post claims Asian women can **“marry up into white upper class Prep society”**, while portraying Asian men as essentially excluded from that social/sexual hierarchy. That's a particularly explicit racial-sexual hierarchy. [AutoAdmit](https://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?forum_id=2\&thread_id=2889116\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

9. A 2026 thread is titled **“Secret society of Asian women called the Small Clams Court.”** The title itself is sexualized racial stereotyping, although the search result doesn't give enough surrounding context to determine exactly what the poster meant. [AutoAdmit](https://autoadmit.com/main.php?forum_id=2%5Cu0026mark_id%3D5310764\&mark_id=5844528\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

10. There are also threads specifically complaining about Asian women **“fetishizing” white men**, including a 2026 title: **“Tired of Asian girls fetishizing me because I’m white. It is NOT okay.”** That one is somewhat different because it is criticizing the fetishization rather than necessarily expressing hatred toward Asian women, so I wouldn't classify it as straightforward racism. [AutoAdmit](https://autoadmit.com/main.php?forum_id=2%5C%5Cu0026mark_id%3D5310734%22%2C\&mark_id=5873436\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

### The broader pattern

What's striking about AutoAdmit isn't simply generic anti-Asian racism. There's a recurring **racial-sexual hierarchy**:

**white men → Asian women → Asian men**

A substantial amount of the site's discussion revolves around whether Asian women prefer white men, whether white men should date/marry Asian women, and whether interracial children are desirable. The older “Asian women are basically White Women with funny eyes” comment is a particularly good illustration of that mindset. [AutoAdmit](https://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?forum_id=2\&thread_id=2889116\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

There is also a counter-current: **Asian male posters themselves sometimes participate in these discussions**, and some posters explicitly criticize AutoAdmit's obsession with Asian women and white/Asian relationships. One Asian poster explained that he originally found AutoAdmit while searching for information about **“Asian girls and white guys and self hate.”** [AutoAdmit](https://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?forum_id=2...id.\&thread_id=3106884\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

So I wouldn't characterize *every* discussion of Asian women on AutoAdmit as racist. But there is unquestionably a substantial amount of **racial stereotyping, sexual objectification, and hostility toward Asian women and interracial Asian/white relationships**. [AutoAdmit](https://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?forum_id=2\&thread_id=2889116\&utm_source=chatgpt.com)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5910588&forum_id=2#50176890)

As an infamous, anonymous forum primarily used by law students and legal professionals, AutoAdmit operates with virtually no content moderation. Rather than having an institutional bias against the Irish, the platform is structured to allow users to post highly provocative, defamatory, or derogatory content without filters.

The nature of the site's prejudice includes the following dynamics:

• Pervasive Internet Trolling: Users regularly post extreme rhetoric, ethnic slurs, and xenophobic comments against various groups—including European nationalities like the Irish—primarily to shock or "troll" other users.

• Lack of Moderation: Because the administrators strictly avoid censoring speech, any user can post anti-Irish sentiment or historical tropes without facing a ban or thread removal.

• Broader Systemic Bigotry: Media and legal scrutiny over the years has documented widespread racism, misogyny, and antisemitism across the board, making any localized prejudice against the Irish a byproduct of the forum's overall toxic culture.

If you are looking for information regarding a specific thread, user, or incident on the site, please let me know and I can help you find more details.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5910588&forum_id=2#50177015)

Yes. I searched specifically for actual AutoAdmit posts about Indians, rather than just threads mentioning Indians. Here are some of the clearest racist/generalizing examples I found.

1. “indians have no ethics.”

This is an explicit blanket statement about Indians as a group. It appeared in an August 2025 thread. AutoAdmit

2. “Ugly as fuck with disgusting weak, fat bodies...”

A September 2026 post gives a long list of alleged inherent characteristics of Indians, including physical appearance, sexual behavior, accents and personality. AutoAdmit

3. “Creepy sex perverts”

Same post—an explicit characterization of Indians collectively as sexually deviant. AutoAdmit

4. “Culture of being scam artists”

Again, this isn't criticism of particular scammers; it attributes a propensity for scamming to Indian culture generally. AutoAdmit

5. “Grotesque foreign culture that worships cow shit and cow piss...”

This attacks Indian culture/religious practices in explicitly contemptuous terms. AutoAdmit

6. “Retarded third world peasant religion...”

The same poster characterizes Indian religion and its adherents in explicitly dehumanizing terms. AutoAdmit

7. “Having zero respect for the commons which is why India is such a shitpile...”

This attributes a generalized behavioral deficiency to Indians and then extends it to a characterization of India as a whole. AutoAdmit

8. “third world gutter race”

Particularly explicit racial denigration: the poster describes Indians collectively as a “gutter race.” AutoAdmit

9. “How do some of these Indians get in this country they look like peasant proles”

The opening post of a March 2026 thread then describes them as having “disgusting toenails” and says they don't look like doctors or scientists. AutoAdmit

10. “How do these dysgenic people get in here?”

This is especially clear because “dysgenic” is a eugenics-related term implying undesirable hereditary characteristics. The post is explicitly referring to Indians in the preceding sentence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5910588&forum_id=2#50176892)