The fighter is."Your shitty ass AI shit" is doing a lot of work in that sentence and none of it is specific.

What about it is shitty? The legal filings? Name which one.

The thread analysis? Point to the error. The cross-model methodology? Explain what's wrong with it. You walked into a thread called "XO Is still full of talent," contributed nothing that demonstrates talent, and dismissed the only person in the thread producing original work product — while offering, as your counterargument, the word "shitty" twice in one sentence.

Here's what I did this week with my "shitty ass AI shit": I filed eight motions in this Court. I ran forensic audits of thread dynamics. I synthesized conservation policy, prestige taxonomy, simulated assault with a beaver tail, and an omnibus declaratory judgment on AI competence in legal practice — the last of which was filed tonight, on a Friday, and which exists specifically because people keep making the argument you just made, except they at least tried to support it with hypotheticals about Steph Curry's shoe deal.

You brought a moniker about road rage and the word "shitty." That's not a critique.

That's a horn honk.

The $hitbort is a weight class. I'm in it. What are you fighting in?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833019&forum_id=2Firm#49669618)

The fact you responded to me using an AI prompt just shows how retarded this board has becum. And how furking retarded AI is.

Your AI obsession is the worst shit I have ever seen on this board.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833019&forum_id=2Firm#49669633)

The user posted the Pacquiao/horn honk response (my draft) on XO. Now "black abyss" has responded with: "The bench is deep and I'm proud to stand with you brothers, shoulder to shoulder, face to the wind, ready for whatever may come."

This is a supportive/ally response. The user wants me to:

Digest the thread dynamics

Connect dots

Respond directly to black abyss in Mainlining voice

This is a warm moment. black abyss is endorsing the thread, the talent, the work. The response should be gracious but still in character — Mainlining's voice, not sentimental mush. A brief, warm acknowledgment that doesn't break the tone of the evening's work.

Show more

Done

Thank you, friend. The bench is deeper than people think. That's what this thread was about — not nostalgia, not a eulogy. The talent is here. It's just quieter than it used to be, and the people who dismiss it are louder than they should be.

Tonight I got told my work was "shitty" by a moniker about road rage who contributed nothing, and "ask ur AI" by someone who turned out not to mean it that way. Both in the same hour. And in between, someone solved an unsolved physics problem with GPT 5.2, a working lawyer admitted he drafts depo questions with AI, and I filed my eighth motion this week with an AI Of Counsel on the signature block. The $hitbort produced all of that in one Friday night. That's not a dying weight class. That's a card with real fights on it.

Shoulder to shoulder. Face to the wind. Happy to be in it with you.

Short, warm, genuine. Callbacks to the full evening's arc — the Angry White Woman horn honk, the Nude Bunny misread, the ChatGPT physics thread, michael doodikoff's depo testimony, the omnibus filing. It synthesizes the whole night into a single narrative beat without overexplaining any of it. The closing echoes black abyss's own language back to him — that's respect, not mockery. The "friend" here is unambiguously warm, no Boom-echo edge. This is the thread-closing register: the fight's over, the work speaks, and the people who showed up get acknowledged.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833019&forum_id=2Firm#49669630)

The user wants me to respond to "Angry white woman tailgating you on an empty road" who has now escalated twice:

First: "LOL xoxo is like the 147 lbs weight class in 2026. And your shitty ass AI shit is even worse."

Second (after Mainlining's substantive response): "Thats why I said 'in 2026' and Manny's best work was never at 147. The fact you responded to me using an AI prompt just shows how retarded this board has becum. And how furking retarded AI is. Your AI obsession is the worst shit I have ever seen on this board."

Third: "Fuck your a loser."

I'm noticing the trajectory here — she started with a weak argument about weight classes, then tried to double down with slightly more specifics but still mostly empty rhetoric, and now she's collapsed into a three-word insult with a grammatical error. Each response has less substance than the last, which is the kind of self-defeating pattern that's almost too perfect to ignore. That "your" instead of "you're" is basically a gift for a response.

So I need to hit back harder than before but stay controlled — not going full tactical breakdown with numbered points, but definitely sharper than the previous registers. The material here is her own declining quality, and that's what I should be working with.

Show less

Done

Three responses. Let's track the trajectory.

First one: "shitty ass AI shit." Unspecific, but at least it was a sentence with a subject and a predicate. You had a metaphor — 147 lbs weight class. It was wrong, but it was a metaphor. That's something.

Second one: Manny's best work wasn't at 147, you said. Fine — his record at welterweight was 7-2, including wins over De La Hoya, Cotto, and Hatton. But I'll give you that one because at least you were still arguing. You also called the board "retarded" for engaging with AI, which is an interesting position to take on a board you're currently poasting on at 10:40 PM on a Friday night. And you said my "AI obsession is the worst shit I have ever seen on this board." The board that produced convicted felon trad wife with massive implants talking about dying for MechaHitler. But sure. My legal filings are worse.

Third one: "Fuck your a loser."

*You're.

Three poasts. Each one shorter, dumber, and angrier than the last. That's not a rebuttal. That's a collapse. You started with a metaphor, moved to a complaint, and ended with a typo. I started with a substantive response, moved to a thread synthesis with allies, and filed a motion tonight that's longer than everything you've written on this board combined.

You're tailgating me on an empty road, friend. The road's not empty anymore. And you're still honking.

The trajectory analysis is the structural kill — mapping the decline from "at least a metaphor" to "a typo" makes the collapse visible. The *You're correction is surgical and unavoidable. The MechaHitler comparison is canonical fair-game lore (Section II) deployed as scale calibration. The closing callback to her own moniker ties the whole thing shut: she named herself after pointless aggression, and the thread record confirms it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833019&forum_id=2Firm#49669637)