When he talks about Women or the pussification of Germany/The West, it could've been written yesterday.

Much of the rest of it is just rambling that you would probably need to be a 19th-century German or an actual scholar to really know wtf he's talking about.

I majored in liberal arts btw.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4268988&forum_id=2#38287828)

His entire normative program is a failed attempt to rebuild Christian values on a secular foundation, which needless to say fails and creates an over-emphasis on will exertion.

His disdain for women is a result of his own atheism-produced failures with women, which while symptomatic in the broader culture, is really about getting cucked by his best friend

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4268988&forum_id=2#38287833)

https://twitter.com/existentialcoms/status/1122649893443489792

https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=default&q=from%3Aexistentialcoms%20Nietzsche&src=typd

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4268988&forum_id=2#38287835)

birdbrainds just cant think deeply for themselves, and thats what niezchtes stands for the most, so it hurts them the most to see that. they can understand things just fine, as they can understand past philosophers, but they never have an original thought in their birdbrain minds, and it probably hurts to know that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4268988&forum_id=2#38289022)

He seemed really big on overcoming condition.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4268988&forum_id=2#38289049)

what are blacks, womyn, jews, gays, et al, if not the historical 'losers' in life who made a whole 'critical studies' religion out of their experience of loserdom?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4268988&forum_id=2#38287844)

read the Birth of Tragedy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4268988&forum_id=2#38288855)

People usually reccommend Twilight of the Idols for a short summary of everything then Genealogy of Morality. Don't touch Zarathustra until the end

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4268988&forum_id=2#38287839)

--------------------------

"When the Jew comes forth as virtue itself, then the Danger is great", That is a quote from Nietzsche's 'Will to Power', and I'm referring to Mr. Kaufmann because that is what he does; his reputation is built on sanitized, literalized, 'honest' Nietzsche. And because of Liberalism, people can no longer pose the proper questions. They can't even recognize his temperament and wonder about why he has such an axe to grind, and why it is ground in such a peculiar way. They can't ask about what exactly Kaufmann is doing to Nietzsche, given this scholar's most profitable historical circumstance, as a Jew in post-war American triumphalism. They can't ask if Kaufmann is Jewing Nietzsche.

The fact is that he indeed did such a thing. What does 'Jewing' mean? Allow me to explain myself, I have to if I'm not to be crucified by the NSA, SPLC and similar bastions of persecution. I'm not antagonizing Kaufmann, because he's really blameless. America had just destroyed Germany, the backbone of Europe. End of story, no questions asked:

"who controls the past controls the future, and who controls the present controls the past"

Europe died in the Second World War, and with it the Old World as such. Russia and much of Asia were trapped in the time capsules of Communism and Islam, so virtually nothing happened over there. If anything, they themselves were backwards, according to Liberalism, and not just economically. There was only America left on the planet, the consummation of Liberalism. The war stood for the victory of tolerance, humanitarianism, peace and 'goodwill' over the forces of darkness, discrimination, violence, judgment, extremism, that had all plagued the world hitherto and which were supposedly epitomized by National Socialism.

Jews had always been victims of those forces, indeed their very essence is determined by it. The very character of their history is a great counterattack against human nature. This is what Nietzsche calls 'the slave revolt in morality'. Kaufmann is amongst the last great Jewish participants in this narrative, which is now meaningless for us. He rode that tidal wave of American, Liberal post-war exuberance, writing about the stupidity of Heidegger's teachings, of Ludovici and Pound's Nietzscheanism. and generally any and all reception Nietzsche received before the war, which according to Kaufmann is mainly 'Nazi'. All of Nietzsche's politically incorrect comments about Jews and Race, which greatly outnumber the accepted ones by liberals, were explained away in the glibbest manner by Kaufmann, as part of that stupid truism amongst Nietzsche scholars, mainly created by Kaufmann, that Nietzsche was merely appropriating Jewish 'spiritualism' for his own devices of liberation, whatever what means for the liberals. Where Kaufmann could not explain away, he said nothing, as in the case of women, liberalism, America, letting the smothering post-war moralism that everyone scurried back under work its magic.

People who paid attention to Kaufmann were very eager to hear such things, especially from a Jewish man, since Jews had suffered so much and we beat the bad guys. Our Christianism served its final purpose in this case; we finally saved the Jews and proved our Christianity. That period was one of a great liberal whitewashing of European history, of de-contextualization, which served as the primer for the liberal 'post-modernist' condemnation of the same history. Harold Bloom and his 'aestheticism' is the most obvious example of this period. Under the spell of the legions of Kaufmann, and Bloom too, which continue into this day,

It is with Kaufmann that Nietzsche acquires the bogus reputation of 'Individualist'. After him Nietzsche 'self-creation' is what you heard and hear. I was once stupid enough to take a 'class' on Nietzsche and some husky gothic slut in the front of the class said on the first day 'I love Nietzsche'. No doubt the narrative of Nietzschean 'Individualism' served her as a destroyer of her parent's hold on their daughter's activities, of her former Christianity, the usefulness of the platitudinization of Nietzsche's comments about Race by academia in racist southern Louisiana, a terrible place for enlightened white females, and she was certainly flattered by the gossip surrounding Nietzsche's comments about 'Art', since in America 'Art' has long since been relegated to the custody of women That is what all the false scholarship of Nietzsche sanitization amounts to. It is amongst the purest examples of Liberalization.

So Kaufmann achieved his objective; to use the blindness of American liberalism in its hour of victory to hide one of the most powerful origins of its opposition. Kaufmann then is just an extension of the war, part of an intellectual Nuremberg. He really did all this to destroy Nietzsche by diffusing him, placing him outside of context as a mere wisdom writer and intellectual curiosity. That is this Jew's personal revenge against Germany and Europe, half disguised as part of the war effort, and to the stupid and oblivious, or equally insidious, as 'scholarship'.

The fact of the matter is that the great Nietzscheans were all born and died at about the same time, from the 1880's till about mid-century or a little after. Ludovici was a better translator than Kaufmann but no one remembers him because he despised liberalism. Same for Wyndham Lewis and Ezra Pound, and Ernst Junger. Same for Othmar Spann. The same would happen to Heidegger if it wasn't for the singular power of his thinking and the deification of Derrida by the academy. There is a host of lesser scholars from pre-war Europe who took Nietzsche equally seriously, all of whom have vanished with the triumph of liberalism. All that remains to Nietzschean 'scholarship' is fraud and self-flattery. The statuses of Derrida, Foucault, Deleuze, Babich and Judith Butleras real understandings of Nietzsche is only the biggest piece of evidence. Kaufmann, Harold Bloom, Robert Solomon, Charles E. Scott and all those who speak of Nietzsche the individualist only prepared the way for this scum.

If you want to understand Nietzsche, don't read Kaufmann's propaganda piece or the 5-star banter about it. Don't even research on the internet, you'll just get lost and ensnared by the garbage. Distrust all scholarship on Nietzsche because every spec of it is liberal revisionism. Read Nietzsche's books properly, that is in the context of the great tradition that preceded him and to which he reacted. Kauffmann's translations themselves are serviceable but only so. Anthony M. Ludovici is an infinitely better translator, go for him first. When you have finally learned all you can from Nietzsche, then go to Heidegger, and the same rules apply there.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4268988&forum_id=2#38287846)

a bunch of certified dumbs casually dismissing NIETZSCHE.

this is just embarrassing. if Nietzsche isn't a genius, who is.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4268988&forum_id=2#38292093)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4268988&forum_id=2#39390598)