But come on, would it really shock you to read some article in 30 years that some random fuck up in your immune or cardiovascular system had lowered life expectancy for vaxmos by a few years?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42881914)

Is it fair to assume that you think the 2020 potus election was “fraudulent”?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42881957)

Why would Moderna ever publish a paper on a failed trial? They're not a public institution and there is a well known bias in academia to not publish papers on failed experiments - thus why none of the data mentioned in the article has ever gone public if there were any universities involved.

I'm not surprised you don't know about this as you are clearly too stupid for STEM. As a former research scientist, you should trust my expert opinion on the field.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42884084)

Great rebuttal.... if the mRNA technology used in the Modern and Pfizer experimental treatments (authorized only for emergency use, we disclaim any and all liability if anything happens, etc etc etf) was actually the sort of "vaccine" that has been used throughout the last two centuries or so, that is.

But hey -- it's not like we're been fucking around with mRNA technology for decades now, and nothing anyone has ever done before in that realm has ever been deemed safe enough (before these experimental treatments which were rushed to the general population in record time, that is) to actually inject average people with on a widespread scale. I'll bet we nailed it this time around though, talk about perfect timing!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42882102)

Oh no, this sounds terrible. Can you elaborate on the dangers were identified?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42884017)

Was this supposed to be sarcasm? The problems that have plagued mRNA vaccination efforts have been widely reported for years in the literal actual relevant peer-reviewed medical literature written about this topic ... you know, the official written reports that document the actual "science" (aka the fancy stuff in the labs done by really smart people in white coats) that you guys constantly fetishize. I thought you were familiar with the substance of this issue? Or are you suggesting that I am just making this up entirely? I encourage you to Google around and pull up and read some of those peer reviewed published papers if you're actually interested. I have, and I'm a literal retard. Surprising that a guy who clearly knows a ton about this topic and is very intelligent and well educated like you isn't also already familiar with this stuff.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42884306)

EPAH, trillions of your unfortunate children's cells agree: u r dumb

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42884136)

Wow that's amazing. Which ones do you have in mind?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42884034)

Sounds like we're in the clear! Why hasn't the FDA given full and final approval yet, then? They must just be dragging their feet, not like they would absolutely love to do that ASAP for political reasons.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42882114)

I thought it provides long-term immunity?

Is it only capable of doing bad things in the short-term, and good in the long-term?

Please advise.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42882135)

Yes, vaccines are only capable of doing bad things in the short-term, and good in the long-term.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42884043)

lmao

Brilliant libs: "Side effects are totally different from intended effects!"

In reality, "side effects" are just what we call things we deem negative that happen after you ingest a drug due to ingesting the drug, and "intended effects" are just what we call things we deem positive that happen after you ingest a drug due to ingesting the drug. There is literally no other distinction or difference whatsoever between those two sets of "effects", as a technical matter. But THIEHTH!!!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42884320)

To be clear, I am not claiming that I know that the safety profile of the vaccines is poor or that they don't make sense from a risk-benefit perspective. I don't know that, but neither do you.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42882026)

Con: "Yeah, same with Covid -- I had that a few months and but I only knew because I took a test, no symptoms and I'm fine now."

Libs: "NO THAT'S TOTALLY DIFFERENT, WHO KNOWS WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS FOR YOU GOOD GOD MAN"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42882160)

it's a relief that the anti-anti-vax people are this bad

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42883006)

i also got the pfizer vaccine four months ago. virtually no side effects after either shot

i feel like im surrounded by lots of mentally ill people on every side of the retard shrieking disguised as a debate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42883977)

you’re the guy mutilating your own children with hormonal castration, yes? i hate that someone with your reasoning ability (or lack thereof) gets to make such decisions on behalf of innocent kids

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42884113)

Wait two weeks!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4891039&forum_id=2#42885460)