*****There was also no control group after Pfizer offered the product to placebo participants before the trials were completed.*****

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4915417&forum_id=2#43070031)

that's game over for me, there's nothing else to see here

this is total fraudlies from top to bottom

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4915417&forum_id=2#43070078)

these people are fucking GONE, man

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4915417&forum_id=2#43070102)

http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=4914318&mc=7&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4915417&forum_id=2#43070214)

Oh, and your thoughts on these vaccines being "safe and effective" based on 6 months of data?

Thank!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4915417&forum_id=2#43077419)

ty

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4915417&forum_id=2#43077460)

it's been a hard day, needed the laugh

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4915417&forum_id=2#43077436)

i'm not even a lawyer

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4915417&forum_id=2#43151720)

I have small network of people I'm working with. Everyone I'm talking to is a researcher, doctor or lawyer. Most of these researchers are scientists, but at least one is a non-scientist using AI to scan scientific journals to find associations, and another non-scientist is an established author who is helping me network. I could use another lawyer who can understand and communicate fluently with scientists and who can help me organize and assemble my filings. I have a Discord server set up.

Send expressions of interest to nsam57@aol.com.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4915417&forum_id=2#43151797)

This is a lot like that. I think it will be fairly straightforward to challenge EUAs issued to date and force the FDA to redo the science, but there are other things you can do, many of them unrelated to COVID per se. I had originally planned to pursue direct litigation, but that's not really practical for me under current circumstances, and dockets are already being poisoned with shitty hair-brained "lawsuits" brought by crackpot shitlawyers.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4915417&forum_id=2#43151888)

Then, when the FEC attempted to ban a Citizens United documentary from being broadcast 60 days before the election, CU made them eat their own words in front of SCOTUS. OSG couldn't do SHIT because the FEC had already gone on the record. OSG was effectively unable to raise arguments that ran contrary to the FEC's reasoning in the administrative record, and was forced instead to defend FEC's shitty reasoning.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4915417&forum_id=2#43151921)

The complainant alleged that the release and distribution of FAHRENHEIT 9/11 constituted an independent expenditure because the film expressly advocated the defeat of President George W. Bush and that by being fully or partially responsible for the film's release, Michael Moore and other entities associated with the film (made by Nuss & co.) excessive and/or prohibited contributions to unidentified candidates. The Commission found no reason to believe the respondents violated the Act because the film, associated trailers and website represented bona fide commercial activity, not "contributions" or "expenditures" as defined by the Federal Election Campaign Act.[12]

In response, Citizens United produced the documentary Celsius 41.11, which is highly critical of both Fahrenheit 9/11 and 2004 Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry. The FEC, however, held that showing the movie and advertisements for it would violate the Federal Election Campaign Act, because Citizens United was not a bona fide commercial film maker.[13]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4915417&forum_id=2#43151956)